Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[NaviSpider]

More LOTR bullshit from Robert.

View attachment 3605741
For context, here is the new clip from the Amazon LOTR that had people bitching:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1559210197431754753

Basically it is warrior princess Galadriel announcing herself with all her pompuous titles and shit, and then the editing dry cuts (even the musics stops) to a new human only saying his name, as his bluntness juxtaposes Galadriel regal pomp.

I don't even think I have to explain that, but yes Robert is right, it is a beat, a humorous one, the type of a humurous beat that relies on a build up of a statement of seriousness and importance, only to be undercut by the trivial or the ridiculous, AKA A JOKE!!!!!!

It is the bathos shit that the MCU relies like a crutch, overused to be the point it became assinine, but not as obnoxious as Robert pretending that it isn't the case, and it is clear as day that this Amazon LOTR will be very much "current year" in its presentation, failing to capture the timelessness of the original work due not having the same talent behind it's words, but instead using modern storytelling conventions to claim audiences.

Also Robert doesn't know how "canon" work. Canon when used in the context of what the fanbase considers "true to the orignal story" isn't just about adaptation, but also to sequels or prequels to a original work. Usually "canon" relates to anything made by the original author, while anex work made by others are either seen "alternative takes" and not to be taken part of the main story, but there are exceptions, and those are usually made when said work strongly resembles the sytle of the original author.

There are cases when the author dies mid-work, and said work is completed by another, such recent case is the manga "Berserker", the author recently passed away but his team and best friend are carrying on with the work, and the fanbase seems to be taking the new chapters as canon because it seems the story has been already been delineated by the original author.

In terms of adaptation, what is considered canon is a work that retains the events and characteristics of the story as close as possible to be recognizable from the original work for authenticity, and it may vary depending of the proprety.

Sam Reimi's Spider-man doen't read like any previous Spider-man comic, but it does have just enough similiarities with the original work, mainly the names of the characters, powers, similiar origin story, that with just take people will take the movie as a genuine "Spider-man", and that maybe be dues the fact that Spider-man already has numerous adaptations in other forms and medias that as long as it retains the basics, that will be enough.

Not so with Lord of the Rings, this work has one very specific source. And yet, the Peter Jackson flicks are considered "canon", even if the story doesn't go over the spam of decades to finish, even if there is no Tom Bombadil and no Scouring of the Shire, and yet the movies are taken as a accepted adaptaion because it remains faithful to the original work in key points to be seen as "genuine".

What ticks me off is that Robert knows that, at least to a point. The notion that "canon" is a 100% adaptation is ludicrous, if that were the case, then there would be no way for stories to transverse medias, this is some bad faith bullshit Robert does and he keeps doing it because he thinks everybody is an idiot.

It would be better if Robert was honest in his stupidity, instead of this malicious bullshit he tries to squirm his way around to dunk on them chuds.

Ok Bob, let's see how you like it. I've just acquired the rights to make a Mario movie. Now, I would argue that Mario is unfilmable, depending on your definition; either A) it literally cannot be made into a film, B) it is not interesting enough on its own to be a film and will need bits added, ir C) is too dense a work to be filmed completely faithfully and will need editorialising. LOTR was considered unfilmable so Peter Jackson went with C, and I think that's what Bob's using.

Let's be charitable and use Bob's definition. There are too many Mario games for me to make a faithful film for them all. How would I include Sunshine, Galaxy, RPG and Mario Kart all at once? Let's cut bits.

If we're cutting bits, that also means I get to change bits. We need to fit the modern day after all. Mario wears a red hat with an M on it, so he must be a MAGA supporter. The plot will revolve around Magario fighting Joe Biden (Bowser in disguise) and Kamala Harris (Birdo) in order to reinstate Donald Trump, as Magario has evidence that the election was rigged.

What do you mean this is nothing like the source material and offensive to the fans? Mario is unfilmable! That means we get to do whatever we want. And I'm sure Bob wpuld just love the stylistic changes we've made to his beloved franchise.

Point being: having a lot to established canon doesn't mean you get to just make shit up or fuck around with what already exists. It doesn't mean "canon doesn't real bro". It means you have to put some actual work into making something that's both faithful and narratively satisfying.

In summary, Bob's an idiot, his argument doesn't work and his point would backfire horribly as soon as it was directed at something he loved instead.

Fuck you Bob. You call yourself a thinker, why don't you fucking try it sometime.

 

[Koby_Fish]

Ok Bob, let's see how you like it. I've just acquired the rights to make a Mario movie. Now, I would argue that Mario is unfilmable, depending on your definition; either A) it literally cannot be made into a film, B) it is not interesting enough on its own to be a film and will need bits added, ir C) is too dense a work to be filmed completely faithfully and will need editorialising. LOTR was considered unfilmable so Peter Jackson went with C, and I think that's what Bob's using.

Let's be charitable and use Bob's definition. There are too many Mario games for me to make a faithful film for them all. How would I include Sunshine, Galaxy, RPG and Mario Kart all at once? Let's cut bits.

If we're cutting bits, that also means I get to change bits. We need to fit the modern day after all. Mario wears a red hat with an M on it, so he must be a MAGA supporter. The plot will revolve around Magario fighting Joe Biden (Bowser in disguise) and Kamala Harris (Birdo) in order to reinstate Donald Trump, as Magario has evidence that the election was rigged.

What do you mean this is nothing like the source material and offensive to the fans? Mario is unfilmable! That means we get to do whatever we want.

Bob would retort that since they managed to make a Mario cartoon (Super Mario Bros Super show), they most certainly CAN make a a Mario film, Friendo!

LOL at Bob saying he made a movie with samurai swords when it was a shitty backyard film. When the person who was talking to him CLEARLY meant actual hollywood movies (or arthouse shit films even lol)

 

[King Dead]

It's bad enough that he doesn't actually comprehend jokes or humor, as evidenced by that bullshit exchange about 'beats vs quips', it's clear FilmBob doesn't understand Canon properly if he thinks that since the exact story of the books is "unfilmable", thus something something canon doesn't matter. Either that, or he's just being a disingenous asshole for the sake of 'winning' an argument on fucking twitter. You know, the website that Bob admits doesn't matter.

Just what is Bob thinking? That because the books are too long and plodding in places (Y Halo Thar, Tom Bombadil), that by excluding any of it, means 'canon' doesn't matter? Uh, no, Bob, that's not how canon works. That's not how non-canon works. You can leave stuff out, and still have it be canon, or faithful to canon. For something to be non-canon, would mean it's specifically going against established canon. And yeah, it's absofrickingloutely outrageously galaxy-smoothbrained of Bob to try to palm off "canon" as meaning 100% inclusive-of-everygoddamnthing-mentioned-in-the-book, and anything less means that canon doesn't matter. Only the paste-eaters in his timeline will accept that ridiculous premise.

I believe in this context, since Amazon's series is a prequel to LotR, Bob's referring to The Silmarillion instead of The Hobbit/LotR. Having actually read The Silmarillion and not just skimmed a Wikipedia article, I would not say it's entirely unfilmable, but it would be a major challenge.

First and foremost, the language is very poetic, and it can be somewhat difficult to parse what exactly is happening. There are also a lot of names to keep track of, and many characters will have two or three used to refer to them, which adds to the challenge of getting through it all. Also, much of the book takes place over thousands of years with little that a more casual LotR fan would recognize. Creation myths, elvish conflicts, Morgoth's schemes and machinations, finally leading to the rise and fall of Numenor...there's a lot to unpack in just a single volume.

I'd still say it would be doable to film it, but there would be some hurdles to overcome. One of the big ones is that whatever you film would almost certainly not live up to Tolkien's own imagination, simply because much of it is supposed to be entirely otherworldly. How do you film things of perfect beauty, after all? And because of the enormous time scales involved, you'd have to basically spell out to the audience how much time has passed between events (or you could go the Amazon route and squish it all down into a week or so apparently). To do it right, you'd probably have to do multiple long series just to cover all the material, a major undertaking to say the least.

That said, there are certainly stories within The Silmarillion that would make for good film, especially those that were republished and expanded later on by Christopher Tolkien using more of his father's notes. Beren and Lúthien, Túrin Turambar, and the Fall of Gondolin are more traditional stories taking place over a shorter time scale, though you'd need probably context to actually understand their plots and how they fit into the story. But I could certainly see them being filmed, though doing them well is not necessarily something I would trust a studio to do, especially not with Amazon basically making shit up whole cloth and passing it off as being faithful to the work.

Anyway, this is all to say that Bob is retarded as usual, and no amount of Wikipedia skimming will make up for that.

 

[The Ugly One]

It's bad enough that he doesn't actually comprehend jokes or humor, as evidenced by that bullshit exchange about 'beats vs quips', it's clear FilmBob doesn't understand Canon properly if he thinks that since the exact story of the books is "unfilmable", thus something something canon doesn't matter. Either that, or he's just being a disingenous asshole for the sake of 'winning' an argument on fucking twitter. You know, the website that Bob admits doesn't matter.

Just what is Bob thinking? That because the books are too long and plodding in places (Y Halo Thar, Tom Bombadil), that by excluding any of it, means 'canon' doesn't matter? Uh, no, Bob, that's not how canon works. That's not how non-canon works. You can leave stuff out, and still have it be canon, or faithful to canon. For something to be non-canon, would mean it's specifically going against established canon. And yeah, it's absofrickingloutely outrageously galaxy-smoothbrained of Bob to try to palm off "canon" as meaning 100% inclusive-of-everygoddamnthing-mentioned-in-the-book, and anything less means that canon doesn't matter. Only the paste-eaters in his timeline will accept that ridiculous premise.

"it can't be perfect, so it's okay for it to be retarded," is a favorite defense of terrible entertainment. It's no big deal for every plot device to be a deus ex, character motivations to make no sense, massive plot holes to tear apart the story, dialog to be confusing, etc, because it's a movie about space wizards with laser swords/flying men in tights/children learning magic at boarding school/etc.

 

[Laughingjoke2]

I personally couldn't give a flying fuck about LOTR Fantasy isn't my cup of tea.

But from what I've read Tolkien feelings were between the Romans and Normans that the English lost their ancient myths and he wanted LOTR to be a type of English Folklore to fill the void. Seems to me "progressives" feel European Fairy Tales and Folklore need Diversity. While god forbid you adapt works of Asian, Middle Eastern, and Native American origins or even worse African Folklore with whites you're appropriating.

I'm pretty liberal and don't give a damn when they race or gender swap capeshit usually. But this shit is fucking annoying because of the cultural double standard.

 

[Bush King]

That said, there are certainly stories within The Silmarillion that would make for good film, especially those that were republished and expanded later on by Christopher Tolkien using more of his father's notes. Beren and Lúthien, Túrin Turambar, and the Fall of Gondolin are more traditional stories taking place over a shorter time scale, though you'd need probably context to actually understand their plots and how they fit into the story. But I could certainly see them being filmed, though doing them well is not necessarily something I would trust a studio to do, especially not with Amazon basically making shit up whole cloth and passing it off as being faithful to the work.

This is probably why the video games are so successful. It doesn't have the "prestige" of print or film, but it further lacks the solid rigidity of a definitive, unchanging work. Even entirely linear video games have the sense that you are influencing the events, even if only partially. Another factor is the video games have always (outside of that one RTS game) been explicitly based off of the New Line Cinema "universe", which is really just a fancy way of saying it has creative license over whatever the prop department made and they can run wild. The Amazon show is claiming to be set in the "real" Tolkien "universe", which is really on true legally speaking. Christopher, after all, was adamant shit like this would not get made.

For many, myself included, most of the New Line Cinema games were at least approaching a level of quality deserving of the title, a sort of good-willed nephew to the books. They weren't aiming to be anything more than just cheap tie-ins most of the time, but the surplus from the film revenue meant even the small games got a good budget, and the writers were given free reign to come up with whatever they wanted. The Amazon show is just clearly by the numbers nufilm corporate bullshit. It's got all the trappings of a Marvel spin on Game of Thrones, which itself now has a new series that has black people with dreadlocks playing characters whose entire race are described as sickly pale and ashen haired.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

More LOTR bullshit from Robert.

View attachment 3605741
For context, here is the new clip from the Amazon LOTR that had people bitching:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1559210197431754753

Basically it is warrior princess Galadriel announcing herself with all her pompuous titles and shit, and then the editing dry cuts (even the musics stops) to a new human only saying his name, as his bluntness juxtaposes Galadriel regal pomp.

I don't even think I have to explain that, but yes Robert is right, it is a beat, a humorous one, the type of a humurous beat that relies on a build up of a statement of seriousness and importance, only to be undercut by the trivial or the ridiculous, AKA A JOKE!!!!!!

It is the bathos shit that the MCU relies like a crutch, overused to be the point it became assinine, but not as obnoxious as Robert pretending that it isn't the case, and it is clear as day that this Amazon LOTR will be very much "current year" in its presentation, failing to capture the timelessness of the original work due not having the same talent behind it's words, but instead using modern storytelling conventions to claim audiences.

Also Robert doesn't know how "canon" work. Canon when used in the context of what the fanbase considers "true to the orignal story" isn't just about adaptation, but also to sequels or prequels to a original work. Usually "canon" relates to anything made by the original author, while anex work made by others are either seen "alternative takes" and not to be taken part of the main story, but there are exceptions, and those are usually made when said work strongly resembles the sytle of the original author.

There are cases when the author dies mid-work, and said work is completed by another, such recent case is the manga "Berserker", the author recently passed away but his team and best friend are carrying on with the work, and the fanbase seems to be taking the new chapters as canon because it seems the story has been already been delineated by the original author.

In terms of adaptation, what is considered canon is a work that retains the events and characteristics of the story as close as possible to be recognizable from the original work for authenticity, and it may vary depending of the proprety.

Sam Reimi's Spider-man doen't read like any previous Spider-man comic, but it does have just enough similiarities with the original work, mainly the names of the characters, powers, similiar origin story, that with just take people will take the movie as a genuine "Spider-man", and that maybe be dues the fact that Spider-man already has numerous adaptations in other forms and medias that as long as it retains the basics, that will be enough.

Not so with Lord of the Rings, this work has one very specific source. And yet, the Peter Jackson flicks are considered "canon", even if the story doesn't go over the spam of decades to finish, even if there is no Tom Bombadil and no Scouring of the Shire, and yet the movies are taken as a accepted adaptaion because it remains faithful to the original work in key points to be seen as "genuine".

What ticks me off is that Robert knows that, at least to a point. The notion that "canon" is a 100% adaptation is ludicrous, if that were the case, then there would be no way for stories to transverse medias, this is some bad faith bullshit Robert does and he keeps doing it because he thinks everybody is an idiot.

It would be better if Robert was honest in his stupidity, instead of this malicious bullshit he tries to squirm his way around to dunk on them chuds.

Why are these animals even talking about the quip when they turned Galadriel into motherfucking braided action girl?

That braid is 200% more offensive than any sorry attempts at humor.

 

[NaviSpider]

Why are these animals even talking about the quip when they turned Galadriel into motherfucking braided action girl?

That braid is 200% more offensive than any sorry attempts at humor.

Galadriel is braided action girl because she's the only female character from that age who normies would actually know. And you need to have a kickass yasqueen slay lady in 2022 products or else the mob comes for you.

The fact that it's completely contrary to her character doesn't matter. Tick those boxes and morons will applaud.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

This is what The Worldwide Celluloid Massacre says about Everything is Shitting Up Everywhere.

Case clinched; it is indeed Twitter-Reddit: The Movie.

I enjoyed Everything Everywhere. I thought it was a fun little flick that did multiverse far better than the MCU's smashing action figures together going "now kiss". It's message of don't give into nihilism was was real nice. Having said that, the author is not wrong with his assessment and I dare say he's right. The lesbo daughter is the ultimate evil because mom forced her to do the mind jumps and then due to shenanigans she becomes basically God as she has seen every reality possible and it broke her mind. She is "defeated" by mom hugging her and being sorry for not validating her gayness. I had never thought about it before I guess because the movie had me wrapped up in it theatrics and distracted me with the jangling keys of visuals. This is like a road to Damascus moment for me and the movie is a little bit colored for me because of it. The fact that Bob insists that anyone who calls it a reddit movie, with zero attempt to explian why it's not, should be brought up on war crimes only helps validate it as a reddit movie.

 

[Flexo]

A joke? A JOKE???

Bob thinks THIS moment is a FUCKING JOKE?

Not only has this moron now been confirmed as 100% autistic, but he's also DEFINITELY a virgin as there's been numerous instances of girls testifying just how wet this scene makes them for Han. (I think there's an entire segment of this in "people vs george lucas")

If Bob thinks that's a joke, then he definitely has never given any woman a moment of pleasure in his entire life.

 

[BubbleButt]

If Bob thinks that's a joke, then he definitely has never given any woman a moment of pleasure in his entire life.

So you're saying he absolutely DOES make up his own plate at the cookout.

 

[NaviSpider]

View attachment 3606690

A joke? A JOKE???

Bob thinks THIS moment is a FUCKING JOKE?
View attachment 3606694

Not only has this moron now been confirmed as 100% autistic, but he's also DEFINITELY a virgin as there's been numerous instances of girls testifying just how wet this scene makes them for Han. (I think there's an entire segment of this in "people vs george lucas")

If Bob thinks that's a joke, then he definitely has never given any woman a moment of pleasure in his entire life.

Bob's autism is showing. Why is he so adamant to handwave a moment of levity away as not a joke? It's a super basic joke and has been a cliche for years. You have a character go on a lengthy diatribe only to be cut off or undermined by a swift response. How is that not a joke?

Fucking Avengers did this Bob! And I bet you laughed your ass off at this "not joke", Loki is berating Hulk saying "I am a god you dull witted creature-" only to be cut off by a sudden burst of violence.

True, Marvel didn't invent this but they've certainly formulated and made this style of comedy a staple of their brand. Bob, what do you gain from denying that other franchises are emulating your beloved MCU?

I love you/ I know is a humerous line but in a very dry way. It's almost quite literally gallows humour, but it's definitely not comic relief. It's more "Han is so cool".

 

[Tronathon242]

View attachment 3606690

A joke? A JOKE???

Bob thinks THIS moment is a FUCKING JOKE?
View attachment 3606694

Not only has this moron now been confirmed as 100% autistic, but he's also DEFINITELY a virgin as there's been numerous instances of girls testifying just how wet this scene makes them for Han. (I think there's an entire segment of this in "people vs george lucas")

If Bob thinks that's a joke, then he definitely has never given any woman a moment of pleasure in his entire life.

There's nothing about this scene that is supposed to be funny. It's endearing because Han is clearly just expressing his love for her in his own way, him being the stubborn smuggler and all. It's also an instance of an actor fully tapping into his character because Harrison Ford thought this would work better than saying "I love you, too" or whatever else was in the script.

Bob's autism is showing. Why is he so adamant to handwave a moment of levity away as not a joke? It's a super basic joke and has been a cliche for years. You have a character go on a lengthy diatribe only to be cut off or undermined by a swift response. How is that not a joke?

Fucking Avengers did this Bob! And I bet you laughed your ass off at this "not joke", Loki is berating Hulk saying "I am a god you dull witted creature-" only to be cut off by a sudden burst of violence.

True, Marvel didn't invent this but they've certainly formulated and made this style of comedy a staple of their brand. Bob, what do you gain from denying that other franchises are emulating your beloved MCU?

I love you/ I know is a humerous line but in a very dry way. It's almost quite literally gallows humour, but it's definitely not comic relief. It's more "Han is so cool".

It's not only Marvel's staple, the writers keep going back to it more than Tony Soprano returned to that sushi place: it's become predictable at best and absolutely bloated and disgusting at worst. A serious MCU film would not be out of place, really. It might even be refreshing and invigorating. But we know they have no incentive to change because the consoomers like Bob need their constant quips so they can clap their hands and point and laugh.

 

[Bolo]

A serious MCU film would not be out of place, really. It might even be refreshing and invigorating. But we know they have no incentive to change because the consoomers like Bob need their constant quips so they can clap their hands and point and laugh.

It is not, the first two Captain America movies can be considered "serious", as in, the first one is a earnest pulp action adventure in the same vein of the Rocketeer (also, same diretor), and the second is a straight forward spy action flick, and those are fine movies.

And there is the issue of the very nature of capeshit, no matter how much "seriousness" you try to inject into the writing, how much much deserved and earnest pathos you give the characters, these are still people wearing silly costumes with silly names designed for silly books made to sell gum for kids, so, there is a limit you know.

That is why the Marvel "humor" managed to work so well at first, it managed to bring levity to the fact we are dealing with grown ass people walking around with silly costumes and names without the forced "seriousness" like the Ang lee Hulk trying to be a shakespearean tragedy and kinda managed to crack the code of how to make these modern super-hero movies, balancing the campiness of the Reimi's Spider-man with the serious drab of the X-men flicks.

But, you know, times take its toll and "Flanderization" occurs, such is the march of time. Can't really fault Disney or any of the production people really, they were just giving the people what they wanted, but more and more as the movies go along and it will take some time till audiences have enough of it, or at least for it to be tangible for the mouse.

Right now, they are making money, so all is well for them.

 

[RockVolnutt]

It is not, the first two Captain America movies can be considered "serious", as in, the first one is a earnest pulp action adventure in the same vein of the Rocketeer (also, same diretor), and the second is a straight forward spy action flick, and those are fine movies.

And there is the issue of the very nature of capeshit, no matter how much "seriousness" you try to inject into the writing, how much much deserved and earnest pathos you give the characters, these are still people wearing silly costumes with silly names designed for silly books made to sell gum for kids, so, there is a limit you know.

That is why the Marvel "humor" managed to work so well at first, it managed to bring levity to the fact we are dealing with grown ass people walking around with silly costumes and names without the forced "seriousness" like the Ang lee Hulk trying to be a shakespearean tragedy and kinda managed to crack the code of how to make these modern super-hero movies, balancing the campiness of the Reimi's Spider-man with the serious drab of the X-men flicks.

But, you know, times take its toll and "Flanderization" occurs, such is the march of time. Can't really fault Disney or any of the production people really, they were just giving the people what they wanted, but more and more as the movies go along and it will take some time till audiences have enough of it, or at least for it to be tangible for the mouse.

Right now, they are making money, so all is well for them.

I disagree. They aren't making as much money as they used to and the attempts at "grounding" things especially in modern MCU stuff is only superficial since it mostly only extends to the visuals like the weird fucking motocross outfits they give everyone. Overall they're even more cartoony then their source material which is an actual problem for them.

People like making fun of modern writers but even a lolcow like Dan Slott could write about the Human Torch being unable to turn his powers off in his Fantastic Four run and treat it seriously. If this was an MCU movie, there'd most certainly be a gag with people roasting marshmellows on him instead of actually acknowledging how horrible it'd be if you're burning everything in sight and have to isolate yourself.

You can't look someone in the face and seriously claim the same movie franchise that just gave us a comedy movie about dying of cancer and is jerking itself off to "OMG BIG MULTIVERSE WAR" is actually grounding anything in any real way. Your average....idk, Hulk comic even from back in the day is nowhere near as jokey if you looked at the entirety of his MCU appearances.

 

[make_it_so]

Bob's autism is showing. Why is he so adamant to handwave a moment of levity away as not a joke? It's a super basic joke and has been a cliche for years. You have a character go on a lengthy diatribe only to be cut off or undermined by a swift response. How is that not a joke?

Fucking Avengers did this Bob! And I bet you laughed your ass off at this "not joke", Loki is berating Hulk saying "I am a god you dull witted creature-" only to be cut off by a sudden burst of violence.

True, Marvel didn't invent this but they've certainly formulated and made this style of comedy a staple of their brand. Bob, what do you gain from denying that other franchises are emulating your beloved MCU?

I imagine he does it to help maintain his delusion that his beloved capeshit franchise really is the modern day equivalent to the painted ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.

 

[Mola Ram]

I imagine he does it to help maintain his delusion that his beloved capeshit franchise really is the modern day equivalent to the painted ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.

This remains among the absolute dumbest things he's ever said, so unfathomably stupid I find myself doubting he really did, no matter how absurd he is, no matter how consoomer-broken his diabetic brain. And yet, there it is, in black and white, almost four years later.

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1036314311314952192

 

[Grumpy Pickle Rick]

I don't care who the IRS sends, I'm still not paying taxes.

Was that a, Dan Vs, reference?

And there is the issue of the very nature of capeshit, no matter how much "seriousness" you try to inject into the writing, how much much deserved and earnest pathos you give the characters, these are still people wearing silly costumes with silly names designed for silly books made to sell gum for kids, so, there is a limit you know.

A lot of people seem to forget that superheroes are very silly. I mean, come on, they are a bunch of costumed weirdos running around and punching criminals.

 

[make_it_so]

This remains among the absolute dumbest things he's ever said, so unfathomably stupid I find myself doubting he really did, no matter how absurd he is, no matter how consoomer-broken his diabetic brain. And yet, there it is, in black and white, almost four years later.

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1036314311314952192

You know what the greatest shame is? It's such an unmitigatingly retarded take, yet Bob is such a nonentity that practically no-one responded to give pushback except for these two.

Spoiler: Google Translates

Guido: "You have never seen the Sistine Chapel, have you? I hope not because you don't even deserve to see it in photography."
Mejicano: "that's already stupid you don't get what disney causes"

 

[Mola Ram]

You know what the greatest shame is? It's such an unmitigatingly retarded take, yet Bob is such a nonentity that practically no-one responded to give pushback except for these two.
View attachment 3608064

Spoiler: Google Translates

Guido: "You have never seen the Sistine Chapel, have you? I hope not because you don't even deserve to see it in photography."
Mejicano: "that's already stupid you don't get what disney causes"

Excellent catch. Glad I posted the link instead of a screencap!