- Joined
- Feb 10, 2015
Pol Pot Belly is the winner. Followed by Joseph Gobbles.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's at ease with it because it's the right people who are lying at ease.Ehhhh...there's pretty good evidence that Obama straight up lied about his stance on gay marriage. Something about supporting it in 2004 or 2005 only to turn around on the campaign trail and claim to be against it.
Doesn't change your essential point, of course. Lying with ease is a hallmark of having no principles. It's just rare to see someone so at ease with it.
And whose fault was that?
![]()
Well, I guess Sweet Dreams, Bound for Glory and Great Balls of Fire! can go fuck themselves.
![]()
"I don't want Disney to own everything, except when I want to spite people I don't like."
![]()
Well, can't wait to get sick of this too.
![]()
![]()
He's been called that twice before in the thread, including once by me. It was what caused him to acknowledge this thread for the first time.Pol Pot Belly is the winner.
Using Hitler as an insult is something that's lost all meaning, ironically because of people like Bob. Calling him Pol Pot is at least different.He's been called that twice before in the thread, including once by me. It was what caused him to acknowledge this thread for the first time.
It still amuses me that getting compared to Pol Pot is what stuck in his craw. He's also barn compared to Hitler and other dictators, but that's the one that pissed him off.
he has devolved to jsut going "NO U"When you're so pathetic you can't even come up with your own Ad Hominems anymore.
Using Hitler as an insult is something that's lost all meaning, ironically because of people like Bob. Calling him Pol Pot is at least different.
Already happened:I'd go with Pinochet just to really see him go nuts. Comparing him to a dictator that is actually somewhat admired by various right-leaning ideologies would likely cause Bob to sperg out over it for an entire week.
He either didn't notice or didn't say anything about it.Plump Pinochet
But really, Bob is a repugnant autocrat and I would not buy things from him.
It's all in personality. Whatever his views (and they were blown out of proportion by media sites), Jon at least knows that people follow him because he does funny, well-produced videos. He's got legitimate talent and a fun personality. Beyond that he seems to have a life outside the internet and he's proved he doesn't need to churn out content every 5 minutes to stay relevant.I wonder how Bob became such a lolcow when JonTron and even AllieRX weren't even considered.
The latter being someone I've known and followed since 2007, he did a real neat twist on the "Angry Gaming" scene, but has this weird voice that makes him sound like he is always drunk.
"I don't want Disney to own everything, except when I want to spite people I don't like."
View attachment 368229
His praise for Chinese action movies unnerves me and should unnerve you all.
![]()
Well, I guess Sweet Dreams, Bound for Glory and Great Balls of Fire! can go fuck themselves.
![]()
Pol Pot Belly is the winner. Followed by Joseph Gobbles.
Its telling how pathetic Bob is when he's willing to pay money just to see others less happy while the film industry, which he supposedly loves, collects under fewer and fewer competing corporations and gets immensely worse from the monopolization.
Joseph Gobbles is good, but I gotta give the nod to Burrito Mussolini.
Quoted for emphasis. Bob is an odd, hateful little man who wants everyone to be as miserable as he is because things aren't going his way. Also, speaking as someone of the lady persuasion, the thought of a rebooted, feminist James Bond gives me hives. I don't want to see Bond drinking soy and talking about his feelings, I want to see him drive a tank through St. Petersburg.
Generally it seems the argument is centered around the protagonists of stories need to be some kind of role model for young (usually female or minority is the goal but they'll say "all") children to look up to. If you say "Lol fuck off" then you're being "irresponsible" because children will "internalize" it anyways.I’ve always found it weird that people want a feminist Bond.
Not every character has to be good.
Bond is a womanizer who has casual sex with multiple people.
Why would you want neuter his main trait?
I don’t care if you reboot Bond as black or a woman or a black woman, as long as Bond is a cool British spy that has lots of casual meaningless sex.
I would also like to add that people who think like this are autists with no grasp on the divide between fiction and reality.Generally it seems the argument is centered around the protagonists of stories need to be some kind of role model for young (usually female or minority is the goal but they'll say "all") children to look up to. If you say "Lol fuck off" then you're being "irresponsible" because children will "internalize" it anyways.
Something something art influences reality something children can't tell something something black kids hear racism everyday something.I would also like to add that people who think like this are autists with no grasp on the divide between fiction and reality.
I'm so sorry.