Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ehhhh...there's pretty good evidence that Obama straight up lied about his stance on gay marriage. Something about supporting it in 2004 or 2005 only to turn around on the campaign trail and claim to be against it.

Doesn't change your essential point, of course. Lying with ease is a hallmark of having no principles. It's just rare to see someone so at ease with it.
He's at ease with it because it's the right people who are lying at ease.

I could say that Bob's morals are despicable, but he's truly not important enough to even call him that.

Simply put, despicable people do despicable actions, and Bob has never done, nor had any action in the first place.
 
And whose fault was that?
ayup-jpg.368223

Well I for one know it had absolutely nothing to do with the wonderful person who said "there are no bad tactics, only bad targets" and constantly spergs about how inferior people in flyover states are allowed to exist. No siry Blob, you and your thought process had NOTHING to do with the polarization of political discourse.


Well, I guess Sweet Dreams, Bound for Glory and Great Balls of Fire! can go fuck themselves.
chardlied-jpg.368224

I love this whole "how dare they make a movie about a celebrity that doesn't have the correct opinions" thought process Bob seems to think the general audience for a country biopic would have, when in reality most people that would see a country biopic would understand that they have more conservative values.


"I don't want Disney to own everything, except when I want to spite people I don't like."
disneybond-jpg.368229


Its telling how pathetic Bob is when he's willing to pay money just to see others less happy while the film industry, which he supposedly loves, collects under fewer and fewer competing corporations and gets immensely worse from the monopolization.


Well, can't wait to get sick of this too.
usefulanswer-jpg.368235
duwp8w8xcam3dnz-jpg.368231

When you're so pathetic you can't even come up with your own Ad Hominems anymore.
 
Pol Pot Belly is the winner.
He's been called that twice before in the thread, including once by me. It was what caused him to acknowledge this thread for the first time.

It still amuses me that getting compared to Pol Pot is what stuck in his craw. He's also barn compared to Hitler and other dictators, but that's the one that pissed him off.
 
He's been called that twice before in the thread, including once by me. It was what caused him to acknowledge this thread for the first time.

It still amuses me that getting compared to Pol Pot is what stuck in his craw. He's also barn compared to Hitler and other dictators, but that's the one that pissed him off.
Using Hitler as an insult is something that's lost all meaning, ironically because of people like Bob. Calling him Pol Pot is at least different.
 
Using Hitler as an insult is something that's lost all meaning, ironically because of people like Bob. Calling him Pol Pot is at least different.

I'd go with Pinochet just to really see him go nuts. Comparing him to a dictator that is actually somewhat admired by various right-leaning ideologies would likely cause Bob to sperg out over it for an entire week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mola Ram
I'd go with Pinochet just to really see him go nuts. Comparing him to a dictator that is actually somewhat admired by various right-leaning ideologies would likely cause Bob to sperg out over it for an entire week.
Already happened:
Plump Pinochet

But really, Bob is a repugnant autocrat and I would not buy things from him.
He either didn't notice or didn't say anything about it.
 
I wonder how Bob became such a lolcow when JonTron and even AllieRX weren't even considered.

The latter being someone I've known and followed since 2007, he did a real neat twist on the "Angry Gaming" scene, but has this weird voice that makes him sound like he is always drunk.
It's all in personality. Whatever his views (and they were blown out of proportion by media sites), Jon at least knows that people follow him because he does funny, well-produced videos. He's got legitimate talent and a fun personality. Beyond that he seems to have a life outside the internet and he's proved he doesn't need to churn out content every 5 minutes to stay relevant.

Bob is caustic 100 percent of the time, completely without nuance or irony (unless it's talking about Nintendo or Marvel and he can't hide his microboner). It's hard to like Bob unless you hold the same viewpoints, and even then you should have sense enough to realize the Basement Baron Harkonnen is someone you can't reason with.

Jon is like the anti Bob. Jon is the college buddy you're happy to see and catch up with whereas Bob is the guy you muted on Facebook before you even graduated.

Tl;Dr MovieBob is not a swood grommet
 
Last edited:
"I don't want Disney to own everything, except when I want to spite people I don't like."
View attachment 368229

Let me remind you all, that early in his Overthinker Days, Bob praised the early James Bond movies as being as much about female sexual liberation as male sexual liberation. And now the only reason he wants Disney to buy the James Bond franchise is because he wants Disney to remove the sexism and turn James Bond into a woman wearing a Hillary-style pantsuit.

And then, after the franchise has turned into a protracted Social Justice lecture and everyone has abandoned the franchise in droves, Bob will say it failed because of "sexism". (Don't worry, Bob! I'm sure it will become a big hit in China! They just loooove pantsuited, nagging harridans in China!)
 
His praise for Chinese action movies unnerves me and should unnerve you all.
foreignmovies-jpg.368232

It just kills me how EVERYTHING he'll complain about conservative americans he'll turn around and praise in the chinese.

Of course China's biggest problem with picking a war is it's one child policy. But i doubt Bob can even think out those consequences.

Well, I guess Sweet Dreams, Bound for Glory and Great Balls of Fire! can go fuck themselves.
chardlied-jpg.368224

"Walk the line" last positive country movie? Not even a reference to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Saw_the_Light_(film) which has bloody Loki playing the lead?

How does this man keep failing expectations that have been set at "dinosaur fossil" levels?
 
Pol Pot Belly is the winner. Followed by Joseph Gobbles.

Joseph Gobbles is good, but I gotta give the nod to Burrito Mussolini.

Its telling how pathetic Bob is when he's willing to pay money just to see others less happy while the film industry, which he supposedly loves, collects under fewer and fewer competing corporations and gets immensely worse from the monopolization.

Quoted for emphasis. Bob is an odd, hateful little man who wants everyone to be as miserable as he is because things aren't going his way. Also, speaking as someone of the lady persuasion, the thought of a rebooted, feminist James Bond gives me hives. I don't want to see Bond drinking soy and talking about his feelings, I want to see him drive a tank through St. Petersburg.
 
Joseph Gobbles is good, but I gotta give the nod to Burrito Mussolini.



Quoted for emphasis. Bob is an odd, hateful little man who wants everyone to be as miserable as he is because things aren't going his way. Also, speaking as someone of the lady persuasion, the thought of a rebooted, feminist James Bond gives me hives. I don't want to see Bond drinking soy and talking about his feelings, I want to see him drive a tank through St. Petersburg.

I’ve always found it weird that people want a feminist Bond.
Not every character has to be good.
Bond is a womanizer who has casual sex with multiple people.
Why would you want neuter his main trait?
I don’t care if you reboot Bond as black or a woman or a black woman, as long as Bond is a cool British spy that has lots of casual meaningless sex.
 
I’ve always found it weird that people want a feminist Bond.
Not every character has to be good.
Bond is a womanizer who has casual sex with multiple people.
Why would you want neuter his main trait?
I don’t care if you reboot Bond as black or a woman or a black woman, as long as Bond is a cool British spy that has lots of casual meaningless sex.
Generally it seems the argument is centered around the protagonists of stories need to be some kind of role model for young (usually female or minority is the goal but they'll say "all") children to look up to. If you say "Lol fuck off" then you're being "irresponsible" because children will "internalize" it anyways.
 
Generally it seems the argument is centered around the protagonists of stories need to be some kind of role model for young (usually female or minority is the goal but they'll say "all") children to look up to. If you say "Lol fuck off" then you're being "irresponsible" because children will "internalize" it anyways.
I would also like to add that people who think like this are autists with no grasp on the divide between fiction and reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back