- Joined
- May 31, 2018
I want to see the look on his face when told that he would be one of the obsolete that would be purged in his superior future.
He's going to be purged eventually, superior future or not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I want to see the look on his face when told that he would be one of the obsolete that would be purged in his superior future.
As we saw in the wedding photos, Bob can't even enjoy being a exotic location. Chances are he doesn't see any value in national parks and would rather be the "Ugly American tourist" stereotype in a major world city.You could argue that States like Wyoming are full of empty space. (The US Government owns 50 percent of the land there.) But even there you have national treasures like Yellowstone and a massive 2 billion dollar per year tourism industry.
It makes me smh too
Fucking hell, it's almost poetic - flyover country is under your feet and hauling your shit, and you keep your nose in the air, Bob.
The second this news hit, my immediate reaction was "MovieBob is eventually going to lose his Twitter account because of this."
Hell, I wouldn't be shocked if Bob is the very first person to get kicked-off of Twitter as a result of this policy change. Him tweeting non-stop everyday makes him the perfect candidate for it.
NEW POLL IDEA: "What would Bob do if/when he gets banned from Twitter."
I second this since he could move onto other social media platforms or something.
But considering Twitter's bias towards liberals, Bob is probably safe.
Bob must be a hoot on car trips, I get the feeling he can't help but point out every single thing outside the window that's, similarly, "a disgrace" to his vision of America. I'll bet his blood pressure spikes every time an F-150 drives past him....
He probably breaks out in a cold sweat once he reaches a landlocked state.
I mean, if Dobson can get himself kicked off of Twitter, so can Bob.Keep in mind even liberals and sjws are constantly jumping into Bob's feed to berate him for his extreme rhetoric. Even Twitter's obvious bias would likely not protect him.
You're telling me that Bob's pride comes before making sensible decisions? Pfffft.
Is it revisionism tho? Let's look at what he's saying.The revisionism begins.
View attachment 556665
Me, also.
Ever hear of East Jordan Iron Works? You might not have. East Jordan is a little town about a half hour from where I was born and raised. Population of... shit, I dunno, a couple thousand? Flyover country.
But if you haven't heard of them? Look down, sometime. They make iron gratings and covers for sewers, storm drains, tree grates, fire hydrants, and the like. They supply a good percentage of the ones used in the country - not all, but a lot. And they supply them internationally, too.
Fucking hell, it's almost poetic - flyover country is under your feet and hauling your shit, and you keep your nose in the air, Bob.
Eh, I'm tired. Plus you just kinda zone out when you have to sift through his verbal diarrhea day in and day out.Is it revisionism tho? Let's look at what he's saying.
>I have never (in any meaningful capacity that anyone themselves worth taking seriously would take seriously) so that wouldn't worry me.
>in any meaningful capacity that anyone themselves worth taking seriously would take seriously
>anyone themselves worth taking seriously
This is what he's saying about you, the person questioning his beliefs. It's not so much "revisionism" as him calling you a dumbass for implying his twitter sperging has any impact on the real world.....despite being legitimate beliefs of his that he wants people reading twitter to enact IRL.
Reminds me of once arguing with Bob and he was telling me that I shouldn't take him saying certain humans aren't human seriously as he's in no position to change the definition despite his previous rants about how we need to study if there's some genetic marker than separates conservatives from "modern 21st century man".
Reminds me of once arguing with Bob and he was telling me that I shouldn't take him saying certain humans aren't human seriously as he's in no position to change the definition despite his previous rants about how we need to study if there's some genetic marker than separates conservatives from "modern 21st century man".