Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
So does Bob like Rand? I think he mentioned her in a positive way sometime before.
He's an objectivist to some degree, thinking himself the great creator mind and big men that Rand believes in. He's more a weird strain of globo-fascist though, since he wants to create a world government under one creed, with the "obsoletes" removed from society.
 
He's an objectivist to some degree, thinking himself the great creator mind and big men that Rand believes in. He's more a weird strain of globo-fascist though, since he wants to create a world government under one creed, with the "obsoletes" removed from society.
Didn't he say that meritocracy is a right wing philosophy?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Wow, how long ago was that taken? That is some absolute shit green screening. If that isn't from when he first started out 20 years ago, there is no excuse. And of course, he once again fails at trying to look like a badass.
February 3rd of this year. He claims that he did it while running a fever which, if you know anything about fevers, makes you wanna dress up all goofy like and film and edit yourself and NOT do nothing as you feel like crap because you're running a fever.
 
Didn't he say that meritocracy is a right wing philosophy?

Bob has no coherent philosophy. In one tweet he'll be pissing and moaning that the government is filled with obsoletes instead of technocrats, the next he'll claim that saying the most qualified person should be hired is a racist and sexist dog whistle.

He's just pro-Bob. Creator of Bobism. It's like Stalinism, but with less effective purges and more Mountain Dew marinaded chicken.
 
So does Bob like Rand? I think he mentioned her in a positive way sometime before.

Nah, he says he dislikes her:

bobshot.jpg


And yeah.. I mean, it's hard to "defend" a bunch of what Rand says, or even discussing Objectivism. I find it to be is a useless efort either way, nowadays Ayn Rand is just "the bioshock game book thing" anyway.

But if I'm allowed to play internet armchair psychologist for a second, most likely Robert was groovy to the whole objectivist shit at one point, I would say that every teenager has that phase, every little dipshit has the ego to think they have what it takes to be the ubermensch at on point in their lives, and seeing how Robert still holds onto the notion of superior and inferior people, most certainly he held some of Rands beliefs.

He shits on Rand now, beacause everybody does, but she is seen as a right-wing philosopher now, and Robert found a new route for his superior man credentials:

like Rand, Robert champions Science and knowledge, but instead of them serving oneself, for Robert the true virtue is intelligence, and that is combined with ultra empathy, or emotional intelligence, meaning, you needs to have put the interests of minorites and the marginalized before yours.

And that would be a nice, if albeit a naive sentiment. But we all know that is bullshit, these self-rigthous internet displays serve no one besides the self-rigthous himself, a pile of empty platitudes and shallow indignation for people they clearly don't care besides the status that "caring" for them can provide inside their own clique.

Robert might have a different route, but same destination as Rand's, and that is a position that will validate their "I'm better than you" certainties in their heads.

Now for the really funny part, is that both Rand and Robert claim to be very much unique individuals when it comes to their personal philosophies, but it is clear to everybody that they are just taking others thoughts putting them on very selfish and rather dumbed down lenses, be Rand's overblown Adam Smith's ideas, or Robert using both Rand's idea of a superior society man but instead of being selfish with his superior intelect, he needs to be almost Zealot like with the ideas of equality and social justice regardless the economic and societal enviroment related to those issues.
 
Last edited:
I'm not a "biology hobbyist" like Bob, but this nostril thing sounds suspect. For one, all land animals that I can think of has two nostrils, not just humans. Two, if the two nostrils have different rates of processing information, I would think it's more like one eye sees better, or one foot is larger, because organisms aren't 100% symmetrical. One nostril "taking it's time" to process information doesn't even make sense. If there is any evolutionary reason for two nostrils, it probably that if one somehow gets clogged, you can still breathe and not die.

Without looking it up, I would place money that two nostrils function for a similar purpose as other pairs on a creature - coverage & direction. In the case of humans, you have 2 eyes in order to determine distance of objects. Ears on both sides of your head allow you to determine where the direction a sound originated from. Nostrils would probably have a similar function to help you figure out the direction of a smell. (or maybe, one of your ancestors had it for that reason and you never bothered to give it up)

And yeah.. I mean, it's hard to "defend" a bunch of what Rand says, or even discussing Objectivism. I find it to be is a useless efort either way, nowadays Ayn Rand is just "the bioshock game book thing" anyway.

I will defer to those who have read or studied Rand in depth, but just some of the casual stuff I've picked up about her, I do wonder if Objectivism was her attempt to create a moral system completely immune from a communist infection. There are apparently some mighty horrific stories of her time in the system (or the start of it) that apparently traumatized her.

But I've never cared enough to really investigate further.
 
View attachment 1239048

So Bob spends all day in bed. This sounds like clinical depression, if true. Bob should really reach out to a mental health professional. (You know, on top of all of his other probable mental issues.)
Bob is depressed because he is an asshole and nobody likes him, constantly being attacked for shitty behaviour normally makes people take note and try to improve, in bobs case he thinks they do it because he is right and they are mayonnaise ghouls.
He is genius level smart so nobody will ever truly understand him and for that he is depressed.
 
I will defer to those who have read or studied Rand in depth, but just some of the casual stuff I've picked up about her, I do wonder if Objectivism was her attempt to create a moral system completely immune from a communist infection. There are apparently some mighty horrific stories of her time in the system (or the start of it) that apparently traumatized her.

But I've never cared enough to really investigate further.

No, you are right, most of Rand's philosophy comes as a repudiation of everything communism or socialism represents, and that is because her family lost everything during the revolution.

I'm no Ayn Rands scholar, I've only read two of her books and read some interviews, but this aspect was always very obvious, as she was pretty cut and dry about her hatred of communism.
 
Last edited:
Without looking it up, I would place money that two nostrils function for a similar purpose as other pairs on a creature - coverage & direction. In the case of humans, you have 2 eyes in order to determine distance of objects. Ears on both sides of your head allow you to determine where the direction a sound originated from. Nostrils would probably have a similar function to help you figure out the direction of a smell. (or maybe, one of your ancestors had it for that reason and you never bothered to give it up)

The two nostrils do have different rates of airflow. Like the penis, the tissue inside of the nasal passages becomes engorged with blood, reducing the rate of airflow in the nostril. Your body alternates which nostril is engorged every few hours. Because different chemicals bond to receptors in the nose at different rates, the slower airflow allows chemicals which require a longer time to bond to receptors the time they actually need.

However, since the human sense of smell plateaus at age 8 and may even start to deteriorate from as early as 15-20, the benefits of the nasal cycle probably aren't the reason why the vast majority of humans have two nostrils. Especially since you could get the same effects by shortening the duration of a cycle in a single nostril. The real reason most likely has to do with the nose's other function: breathing. Since people who have a perforated septum or facial clefts which affect the nose typically have breathing problems hypothesized to result from turbulent airflow in the nose, it's likely that humans or our ancestors who had a large single nostril also had breathing problems resulting from turbulent airflow and were less likely to survive long enough to pass on their genes.
 
I will defer to those who have read or studied Rand in depth, but just some of the casual stuff I've picked up about her, I do wonder if Objectivism was her attempt to create a moral system completely immune from a communist infection. There are apparently some mighty horrific stories of her time in the system (or the start of it) that apparently traumatized her.

But I've never cared enough to really investigate further.

Effectiely yes, shes was very much a trying to construct a philosophical reaction to Communism and the left wing tendacies is academia, she's obviously quite bitter about the Soviet unions destruction of the family business which is a reasonable emotional response but clouds judgement. Combined with her personal flaws as a writter,human and a philospher means that Objectivism is at best half formed something which shows in praxis.

Bob even if he doesnt accept rand is clearly heavily influenced by her, you can see in his response to people he deems as wrong or inferiors or the way they presume they've transcended their emotions when they're dominated by them. They effectively want the same sort of world except Bob thinks of the noble elite in terms of intellectuals and artists whereas Rand considers captains of industry. Bobs also more comfortable with corruption because he's a coward which whatever can be said of Rand she wasnt.
 
Last edited:
Effectiely yes, shes was very much a trying to construct a philosophical reaction to Communism and the left wing tendacies is academia, she's obviously quite bitter about the Soviet unions destruction of the family business which is a reasonable emotional response but clouds judgement. Combined with her personal flaws as a writter,human and a philospher means that Objectivism is at best half formed something which shows in praxis.

Bob even if he doesnt accept rand is clearly heavily influenced by her, you can see in his response to people he deems as wrong or inferiors or the way they presume they've transcended their emotions when they're dominated by them. They effectively want the same sort of world except Bob thinks of the noble elite in terms of intellectuals and artists whereas Rand considers captains of industry. Bobs also more comfortable with corruption because he's a coward which whatever can be said of Rand she wasnt.

Ya know, it's really super hard to feel pity for the bitch. Since her entire backstory was "Oh, I was from rich high-class society and then the revolution happened and I lost all my shit" well cry me a drive of emo blood ya spoiled bimbo.
 
Ya know, it's really super hard to feel pity for the bitch. Since her entire backstory was "Oh, I was from rich high-class society and then the revolution happened and I lost all my shit" well cry me a drive of emo blood ya spoiled bimbo.

She was from the upper middle class rather than the hyper rich. Her bitterness is understandable, her godawful conduct isnt.

Also Atlas shrugged is boring and all the characters except eddie and knock off Oppenheimer are unlikable sociopaths.
 
Don't worry Robert, we can tell
View attachment 1238624
His "knowledge" of biology and history are not self-taught, but SJW-taught and Hollywood-taught. It is very unlikely that a self-taught person to be so reliably wrong all the time.

I'm not a "biology hobbyist" like Bob, but this nostril thing sounds suspect. For one, all land animals that I can think of has two nostrils, not just humans. Two, if the two nostrils have different rates of processing information, I would think it's more like one eye sees better, or one foot is larger, because organisms aren't 100% symmetrical. One nostril "taking it's time" to process information doesn't even make sense. If there is any evolutionary reason for two nostrils, it probably that if one somehow gets clogged, you can still breathe and not die.
The nostrils are not sense organs; the olfactory epithelium is. There are a lot of neuronal endings in the olfactory epithelium, and for a certain olfactory molecule, some neurons may be sensitive to lower concentrations of that molecule than other neurons, so they detect it earlier and fire sooner to alert the animal. But there is no evidence at all that more-sensitive neurons are concentrated on one side of the olfactory epithelium. Also keep in mind that the two nostrils are not entirely separate: they share a common back passage (the choana) along which air can pass.

So does Bob like Rand? I think he mentioned her in a positive way sometime before.
He recommended Rand in the notorious "Building a Better Gamer" video.
Rand and her protagonists feel they are somehow dragged down or "robbed" by the inferior mass -- and so is Bobby.
 
Last edited:
No, you are right, most of Rand's philosophy comes as a repudiation of everything communism or socialism represents, and that is because her family lost everything during the revolution.

I'm no Ayn Rands scholar, I've only read two of her books and read some interviews, but this aspect was always very obvious, as she was pretty cut and dry about her hatred of communism.
I read about a fifth of Atlas Shrugged as a college freshman and even then I could not go much further because she’s kind of a shitty writer and her prose is laborious to work through. Still, unless it takes a wild swerve into ethnic supremacy later in the book, the classification of Rand with supremacist ideologies is puzzling. Her target seems to be very specifically those who go into politics because they failed at business. The main character’s brother seems like a barely exaggerated version of someone who calls for the regulation of railroads because they lost business to Vanderbilt. The mediocre sons of great men syndrome.
There may also have been an attempt to draw a parallel between the robber baron mythos American socialists of the 1920’s were building and the communist propaganda war on the Kulaks before there was any shooting. IDK “fuck commies and diet commies” isn’t far right so much as it is not far left. So if what Bob got from it is the mayonnaise ghouls are holding him back from being able to fuck his toaster then his fat invaded his brain.
 
Here's the salient point you have to understand about Bob and Objectivism, or Communism, or Liberalism, or any other system of political thought: whatever it is he's talking about, he's guaranteed to be both wrong and smug. He's not intelligent, he's not well-read, and he has no real-world experience to fall back on when judging the merits and deficiencies of a political or moral system of thought. Any take Bob has is guaranteed to be of the most superficial kind, because Bob's knowledge is as deep and clear as a mud puddle.

The smugness comes because he is deeply insecure and terrified that people will see how ignorant he truly is. Much like his constant use of invective, it's designed to get people to engage with him on an emotional level (which he's comfortable with) instead of an intellectual level (which he is extraordinarily poorly equipped for). He's happy slinging insults and getting insulted. But actual, fact-based debate? Forget it.
 
He was only pretending to be Oblomov
View attachment 1240937

Had to google Oblomov... seems to be a good story about being a lazy fuck, been looking for a book to read.

Also, Robert, you are not a 15 year old girl, you don't need to tweet every single thing you do in your crappy life, even more so when you are well aware there are tons of people just waiting to bust your balls over every little thing, so this act of "I didn't mean it like that, you idiot" is even more pathetic, because you are almost 40 and talking about taking out your bed sheets so you don't get the urge to nap, LOL, gonna put it on insta!!!

The smugness comes because he is deeply insecure and terrified that people will see how ignorant he truly is. Much like his constant use of invective, it's designed to get people to engage with him on an emotional level (which he's comfortable with) instead of an intellectual level (which he is extraordinarily poorly equipped for). He's happy slinging insults and getting insulted. But actual, fact-based debate? Forget it.

Maybe.. and sure, Robert might not have all the screws on his head on a tight fit, but people who are terrified to be found out as ignorant usually don't talk a lot, because by talking is the easiest way to give away how dumb your are.

I would say that Robert has this viceral need for validation of his intellect, he wants so bad to seen as this pragmatic man of culture and science, this example of cosmopolitan citzen of the world, engaged in all cultures and able to talk about a myriad of subjects, if not with expertise, but with insight and clevernes...

But what sucks for Robert is that, well, smart people, REAL smart people, are hard to come by, and even so, they usually keep the talk to the shit they know, the rest of us are just mediocre fucks wasting our times till the grave hoping that we made at least some difference (spoiler, we didn't), and for Robert's misfortune, he is one of us.

And the thing about being a mediocre fuck, is that we recognize one of our own, and it's pretty fucking obnoxious when a mediocre fuck is trying to pass as something he isn't, hence one of the many reasons on why Robert gets mocked on a daily basis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back