Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
My point: why would Bob's plan to diverge the budget of the agrarian sector into forgiving student loans be a sensible fiscal policy for the United States?
My point: Who the fuck cares? MovieBob takes on domestic agricultural policy are as irrelevant, unwanted and unnecessary as it gets.

Speaking of irrelevant, unwanted and unnecessary, Chris has a new podcast out. Never have so many exclamation points aroused so little excitement.

C8D04159-B82E-467B-B3A8-0E0E06D565A4.jpeg

Still, I was kinda happy for him that he got two comments. Oh, wait:

6D4A9000-7C11-4F15-B145-74791605DBAD.jpeg
 
I'm extremelly biased against Bob. He could start making a case against going to war with Iran and my first instinct would be to go full McCain because it's Blob.

Having said this, why are the agrarian policies in the US considered inefficient? Is it because it incentivises mass illegal immigration to keep labor costs low and give amnesty after 5 years repeating the cycle every half a decade? Is it because driving down corn prices makes them unfairly competitive as raw materials in all types of unhealthy food? Is it because there's a deficit in the trade balance and all the money being pumped into the agrarian sector ends up in products that are being exported outside and the US depends on other countries to feed itself?

I'm trying to find examples of the EU (the CAP) shitting the bed over the course of 60 years but Jewgle sure loves memoryholing that part of history.

My point: why would Bob's plan to diverge the budget of the agrarian sector into forgiving student loans be a sensible fiscal policy for the United States?
It doesn't matter if it makes fiscal sense to forgive over a trillion dollars in student loan debt that the government took on because of other retarded policies. In Bob's opinion, anything that helps the cosmopolitan urban elite "Thinkers" triumph over the backwoods hick "Believers" is a good thing. He legitimately believes, ironically enough, that anyone who works in manual labor is a completely retarded untermensch that fucks their sisters and prays to the magical sky fairy while rounding up black people and lynching them on the weekends. Never mind that a huge chunk of these degrees are going towards useless subjects like any [x] studies major, that degrees have become effectively meaningless now that everyone has one, and that people really should have done a better job asking themselves whether it really made sense to take out tens of thousands of dollars in loans that they might never be able to pay off (nor declare bankruptcy to discharge them), college is super important so we should subsidize it!

I'm not well-versed on issues that the agricultural sector might have, so I won't comment on our current policies. But I'd gladly continue farm subsidies over forgiving a dangerhair's $100k gender studies degree.
 
It's true Stalin was a monster, but ironically it was probably his cold brutality and force of character that prevented the Soviet Union from collapsing under the German onslaught in early 1941.
It was Stalin's purges in the 1930s that made the onslaught of 1941 worse to begin with. That's what happens when you're paranoid enough to start shooting your actual competent military commanders.
 
I'm extremelly biased against Bob. He could start making a case against going to war with Iran and my first instinct would be to go full McCain because it's Blob.

Having said this, why are the agrarian policies in the US considered inefficient? Is it because it incentivises mass illegal immigration to keep labor costs low and give amnesty after 5 years repeating the cycle every half a decade? Is it because driving down corn prices makes them unfairly competitive as raw materials in all types of unhealthy food? Is it because there's a deficit in the trade balance and all the money being pumped into the agrarian sector ends up in products that are being exported outside and the US depends on other countries to feed itself?

I'm trying to find examples of the EU (the CAP) shitting the bed over the course of 60 years but Jewgle sure loves memoryholing that part of history.

My point: why would Bob's plan to diverge the budget of the agrarian sector into forgiving student loans be a sensible fiscal policy for the United States?
I said in another thread that farm subsidies are a double edged sword, and someone had the kindness to elaborate on this point explaining that it hurts the economy, but it's a necessary evil if we want to keep having cheap food. The main gist of it is that farm subsidies are good to keep people working in the countryside and not having entire swathes of your country entirely unpopulated, control the enviroment, stimulate the economy creating secondary jobs and having stable and low food prices. But the main drawback is that subsidies tend to be distributed uneven, giving more to rich farmers than to poor farmers, how industrial farming is extremely inefficient and takes most of the subsidies and how you need to put in quotas to balance out the market or riks it being flooded with food so cheap the farmers will not make a profit.

In the EU, this works due to 50 years of having this practise. If you have a farm and you want to be a comercial farm (AKA, you want to sell your produce in large amounts) you need to accept the EU quota (therefore, you can only produce certain amounts of X and Y, reason why in the past many farms were forced to close). In a normal situation this is paired with high import tariffs in order to favour local products rather than imports. If there is a good season and there is more food than the one expected by the quota, the EU will finance exports, making these products more desirable. While if there is a shortage, they will lift restrictions on imports.

Meanwhile, another person explained how this system is fucking the canadians right in the ass because of NAFTA, since american farmers sell their produce cheaper than canadians due to essentially being borderless and having subsidies, hurting their primary sector. This as well hurts small farmers because they cannot pay for their production costs while bigger farms are the ones that benefit from this because production costs in farming don't scale linearly.

I'm by no means expert, but i know my way around the EU farming policy and how they keep a stern control over it or production in the EU would become a terrible problem.

Edit: forgot to add, this is also the main reason there is corn syrup in everything. Mainly, because it's cheaper and much easier to produce than sugar, which wouldn't grow in most of the US.
 
Crazy the amount of eugenics hypocrisy in this thread
A one time jab compared to years of it. Totes the same.

But I'll bite anyway.
Unlike when Blobo does it, there are plenty of examples that showcase the pieces of shit the Chipman brothers are.
Leftists don't want him. Righties certainly don't want him.
His fellow lolcow Shoe0nHead dunked on him in 2016 as a center-right grifter and dunks on him today as a leftist grifter.
Bob's distastefulness is universally appalled.
 
Stating the obvious fact that Chipman DNA is warped has nothing to do with eugenics. It has to do with one family that produces morbidly obese, obsolete beggar lolcows as if they’re getting paid by the pound. Meanwhile, Bob wants to slaughter millions of people based on geographic lottery of birth. Spot the difference.
 
Out of curiosity I checked whether Chris circular-donates to other e-beggars to inflate his Patreon number. Somewhat surprisingly, only three of his supporters donate back (their names in red squares):
763.png
Note Chris, for some reason, donates to something called TerfBlocker.

All these guys are tiny, tiny fry, with Patreon numbers in the single or low-double digits. The exception is Alex Shaw (185 suckers, $1219 per month). In two of the three cases the back-donors also give Bobby money:
1.png

I know you ask, so here's the list of beggars that hang on to Bobby:
bbn.png
The people in pink squares are all trannies. Banana Wu, Nick Parrott, and Jake motherfucking Alley should be familiar to most people (Don't know about Jake Alley? Boy you missed out!). "Penelope Pilbeam" is "Nymphomachy", a frequent orbiter of Bobby's Twitter. LauraKBuzz claims to have "gender euphoria" and will have a book called Things I Learned from Mario's Butt published soon. Biological Riley (Riley Constantine) is a relatively boring specimen who riles on Trump and J. K. Rowling, and thinks the world needs yet another queer reading of The Matrix films.

453.png

Many of the people Bob supports never create a fucking thing.
 
Last edited:
The modern age of roided out 0% body fat movie stars has really poisoned peoples ideas of what good physical fitness is.

Bruce Willis in Die Hard 1 was in excellent shape, and was in more then good enough shape for a cop.

Considering that Bob himself should probably aspire to Carl Winslow in Die Hard's physique, I don't think he should even be talking.
The modern age was already 5 years old by that point. The cast of predator, jcvd, and rambo all were big names and muscled out. Bruce Willis was the subversion. A schlub, divorced, flew coach across the country. He might have muscles but thars because hes from a time when whites worked out the way blacks and latinos do today. Compared to other action movie heroes of the day he was Niel Patrick Harris. And thats a pretty spot on analogy considering he was mainly know for being a song and dance man, the lead in a sitcom about putting up with cybyl Sheppard.

And this isnt even a unique take, its the most well known take of the day. Bruce Willis was the subversion. He looked like shit, ran away all the time. Pulled coward moves and constantly whined. The exact opposite of a badass.
 
There's a couple of different videos on YouTube that explain the how and why of US farm subsidies. The TL;DR is that the margins on agriculture products are dogshit, relative to their harvesting cost, but the product is absolutely vital to the continued survival of the human race. I got curious about this subject when I was playing Farming Simulator, and it's pretty interesting.


You'd think with how fat Bob is, he'd appreciate food enough to actually do some research.
 
Forcing a political narrative onto Men in Black is retarded, one can just as easily make the case it's rightwing, the second movie is about trying to fight a woman who is a intergalactic border jumper, and the third movie ends with a government agent lying to a little black boy about where his father is.
And no one knows what the fourth one was about because they didn’t see it.

I think it’s a mistake to try to read the first MIB in modern political terms, because Current Year political concerns weren’t a thing back then. The movie came out at a time when paranormal conspiracy theories were huge in pop culture - X-Files, Dark Skies, Millennium etc. The MIB were the antagonists in such stories. The movie just parodied that, flipped the whole thing on its head to ask who the MIB were and why they do what they do.

I think there is a line to be drawn from the 90s cultural zeitgeist to modern conspiracy theories, but MIB isn’t on there. It’s like trying to understand post-Cold War espionage through the Austin Powers films.
 
It's one thing to ask for money on Patreon if you're providing unique and interesting content in exchange.

Meanwhile, my favorite podcast may be shutting down due to lack of support.

It's infuriating that an excellent college-level history podcast (IMHO) is struggling while numbskulls like the Chipmans get more and better support, but I suppose that's how it has always been and always will be.

Space Rocket History. https://spacerockethistory.com/

A chronological, in-depth history of crewed and the more significant uncrewed launches. Episode #351 just released; it is the return of Apollo 15.
 
Well of course Bob has no idea about the logistics of food. He lives a proudly sheltered life in a coastal city. As far as he cares, people in rural areas can hold their starving children as they die and globalism will just magic those cheeseburgers on to his plate. Obviously. For him, the actual real life problems with food importing/exporting is something dumb gelded peons do for him while he, the superior specimen, devours cholesterol by the bucketful.
 
Crazy the amount of eugenics hypocrisy in this thread
Okay, I’ll explain the meme for you. The joke is that, based on Bob’s own worldview, Bob himself would be obsolete and purged from the gene pool. Sometimes posters in this thread like to talk like Bob in order to point this fact out in a humorous fashion. Get it?
 
You'd think the Pandemic would had taught him something but of course not Film Robert is too thick and dumb.

I say this as an uppity city boy I can guarantee you rural folks weren't panicking like city folk when Walmart ran out of shit. These people have pantries full of fruit and vegetables they grew, canned, and preserved with a freezer full of venison from deer season in a lot of cases. When the shit hits the fan it's us comfortable city dwellers used to getting everything handed to us that are fucked.
 
I said in another thread that farm subsidies are a double edged sword, and someone had the kindness to elaborate on this point explaining that it hurts the economy, but it's a necessary evil if we want to keep having cheap food. The main gist of it is that farm subsidies are good to keep people working in the countryside and not having entire swathes of your country entirely unpopulated, control the enviroment, stimulate the economy creating secondary jobs and having stable and low food prices. But the main drawback is that subsidies tend to be distributed uneven, giving more to rich farmers than to poor farmers, how industrial farming is extremely inefficient and takes most of the subsidies and how you need to put in quotas to balance out the market or riks it being flooded with food so cheap the farmers will not make a profit.

In the EU, this works due to 50 years of having this practise. If you have a farm and you want to be a comercial farm (AKA, you want to sell your produce in large amounts) you need to accept the EU quota (therefore, you can only produce certain amounts of X and Y, reason why in the past many farms were forced to close). In a normal situation this is paired with high import tariffs in order to favour local products rather than imports. If there is a good season and there is more food than the one expected by the quota, the EU will finance exports, making these products more desirable. While if there is a shortage, they will lift restrictions on imports.

Meanwhile, another person explained how this system is fucking the canadians right in the ass because of NAFTA, since american farmers sell their produce cheaper than canadians due to essentially being borderless and having subsidies, hurting their primary sector. This as well hurts small farmers because they cannot pay for their production costs while bigger farms are the ones that benefit from this because production costs in farming don't scale linearly.

I'm by no means expert, but i know my way around the EU farming policy and how they keep a stern control over it or production in the EU would become a terrible problem.

Edit: forgot to add, this is also the main reason there is corn syrup in everything. Mainly, because it's cheaper and much easier to produce than sugar, which wouldn't grow in most of the US.
Thank you for your response. Scale economies was not something I was taking into consideration.

Regarding the EU, I feel like I'm going crazy but do you recall the Netherlands dumping milk into the ocean just to keep their prices up and not accempt any more imports? I just can't find the news articles anywhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back