Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Funny thing about the Constitution: when it was being drafted, many of the Founding Fathers wanted to abolish slavery. The reason they didn't was because the slave-owning states threatened civil war, and they didn't want to fight another war so soon after the Revolution. The slave-owning states wanted to be able to buy and sell their human chattel and deny them rights (like voting), but also wanted them to count as people for the purposes of the Electoral College and seats in the House of Representatives- a classic case of wanting to have their cake and eat it too. The compromises they came up with (like the three-fifths compromise) were not only a way to give the slave owners what they wanted, they served to highlight the mental gymnastics conducted by slave owners (e.g., "how can a person count as a person for the Electoral College and the House, but not be considered a person otherwise?")

Much of what erodes the Constitution today is by and large due to a lack of respect for the document. The Tenth Amendment specifically states that any powers not specifically given to the Federal Government are reserved for the people and the states. But if we ignore that bit, we can justify all sorts of things!

Also Bob is fat and nobody will have sex with him.
That's the point. Modern lawmakers wipe their asses with the Constitution, so why should the average normie getting tired of liberalism care about it? But religions that have lasted for eons, that weathered persecution and lived through both golden ages and dark ages, they have a bigger appeal. So while they have no faith in modern lawmaking and constitutions, the idea that God is on their side is a far stronger, far more appealing idea, and basing future laws on that would be far more enticing since instead of basing it on some mortal constitution designed by mortal men who backed down when threatened by slaveowners, they can look to their God's rules and laws instead, which has a bigger appeal to an increasingly growing number of radicalized religious people, both on the Christian and Muslim side.

Also, some of the Founding Fathers were slaveowners. So not all of the Founding Fathers wanted to end slavery.

Bob might get laid if he paid for it. But considering his looks, the hookers might charge extra.
 
Last edited:
That's the point. Modern lawmakers wipe their asses with the Constitution, so why should the average normie getting tired of liberalism care about it? But religions that have lasted for eons, that weathered persecution and lived through both golden ages and dark ages, they have a bigger appeal. So while they have no faith in modern lawmaking and constitutions, the idea that God is on their side is a far stronger, far more appealing idea, and basing future laws on that would be far more enticing since instead of basing it on some mortal constitution designed by mortal men who backed down when threatened by slaveowners, they can look to their God's rules and laws instead, which has a bigger appeal to an increasingly growing number of radicalized religious people, both on the Christian and Muslim side.

Also, some of the Founding Fathers were slaveowners. So not all of the Founding Fathers wanted to end slavery.

Bob might get laid if he paid for it. But considering his looks, the hookers might charge extra.
Bob probably thinks he's too good for hookers. He wants a boyfriend-free Asian Princess Peach, or something.
 
I don't think constitutionalism will get that many supporters. Aside from the fact that a growing amount of people are losing faith in democracy, everyone who's cracked open a history book knows that constitutions are flawed and easily changed; back then the US Constitution guaranteed slavery, now it stands against slavery. Not to mention that constitutional rights are easily trampled upon with hate speech laws and gun control. So most people going full traditionalist would rather put their trust in systems that have existed for millennia as opposed to centuries.
The US constitution doesn't even mention the word slavery.
 
The US constitution doesn't even mention the word slavery.
The US Constitution still allowed slavery to exist, which is why abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison used to burn copies of it:

"The abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison thought the U.S. Constitution was the result of a terrible bargain between freedom and slavery. Calling the Constitution a "covenant with death" and "an agreement with Hell," he refused to participate in American electoral politics because to do so meant supporting "the pro-slavery, war sanctioning Constitution of the United States." Instead, under the slogan "No Union with Slaveholders," the Garrisonians repeatedly argued for a dissolution of the Union."
 
Rate me hopeful but the dream is that we will be able to leave much of the bullshit we've made for ourselves on Earth behind. A chance to go back to a world where humans can live without room for anti-social internet blowhards, insane predatory fetishists, and what not.

Fat chance, I know, but sustaining life on other worlds in our solar system also creates an existential insurance plan for the entire human race. All the more so if we can try for exoplanets; some combination of stasis, generation ships, and nuclear pulse propulsion a la Project Orion, if I had to brainstorm. If it is at all possible, it will only be possible by exploiting resources from off Earth. Mars would be an ideal staging ground to mine the main asteroid belt, where there is unfathomable wealth in metals waiting for the claiming.

I'm just rambling here, I'm not a smart enough guy to say exactly how this would or wouldn't go. But those are some thoughts.
All it would do is give Elon Musk a private planet while our society goes to shit. No thanks.
Although we may one day have to turn to the stars for salvation.
How so?

If the climate's that fucked here then it'll be too late for us to set up a space colony.
Bob might be wanting to off these folks because in the near future, when more religious people take over the first and second world due to their numbers, he knows that people like him would get ostracized from society at best, and shot for being a filthy degenerate at worst. Especially if traditionalist Chrisitans or Muslims take over, Bob and his fellow libs would definitely not be welcome.
What I don't get is why Blob supports mass immigration when many immigrants tend to be very socially conservative.
this is what bob thinks wisdom/intelligence manifests as in a "thinker":

-Belief in the Soopeeryah Fyootcha
-Fedora-tipping m'latheism
-Belief in the extermination of the mayonnaise ghouls as a necessity to achieve Soopeeryah Fyootcha
-being Progressive in all things
-I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE (except when inconvenient, then science may be denied in favor of pseudoscientific psychological word salad that denies biological sexes etc.)
It's worth noting that, according to him, the Nazis weren't smart because of what they believed.
I'll be honest, I'd rather avoid any kind of theocracy. As much of a traditionalist as I've become in recent years, I still think traditional constitutionalism is far superior to traditional Christianity itself. I can only hope you're wrong about the Muslims, but you're probably right. Still, it'll take a generation or two to actually get to that point at the very least, and by then Blob will be dead from diabetes or something.
The thing is that constitutionalism got us into this mess.
That's the point. Modern lawmakers wipe their asses with the Constitution, so why should the average normie getting tired of liberalism care about it? But religions that have lasted for eons, that weathered persecution and lived through both golden ages and dark ages, they have a bigger appeal. So while they have no faith in modern lawmaking and constitutions, the idea that God is on their side is a far stronger, far more appealing idea, and basing future laws on that would be far more enticing since instead of basing it on some mortal constitution designed by mortal men who backed down when threatened by slaveowners, they can look to their God's rules and laws instead, which has a bigger appeal to an increasingly growing number of radicalized religious people, both on the Christian and Muslim side.
Not to mention that the Constitution has no effect on what happens after you die.
 
What I don't get is why Blob supports mass immigration when many immigrants tend to be very socially conservative.
Typical leftist ignorance. He thinks they're all socialists or friendly towards leftism, he doesn't know that at least half of them are wife-beaters.
It's worth noting that, according to him, the Nazis weren't smart because of what they believed.
Being smart is different from being wise. The Nazis were smart in that they had some neat tech and science to go along with some brilliant tacticians, but they weren't wise enough to use their power to create a more long-lived empire and instead fought a two-front war that ended with their doom.
The thing is that constitutionalism got us into this mess.
Exactly. Not to mention that constitutionalism is fickle because the constitution can be changed at any time.
Not to mention that the Constitution has no effect on what happens after you die.
True. Being a loyal follower of the Constitution won't net you any sympathy points when you reach the Pearly Gates.
 
Funny thing about the Constitution: when it was being drafted, many of the Founding Fathers wanted to abolish slavery. The reason they didn't was because the slave-owning states threatened civil war, and they didn't want to fight another war so soon after the Revolution. The slave-owning states wanted to be able to buy and sell their human chattel and deny them rights (like voting), but also wanted them to count as people for the purposes of the Electoral College and seats in the House of Representatives- a classic case of wanting to have their cake and eat it too. The compromises they came up with (like the three-fifths compromise) were not only a way to give the slave owners what they wanted, they served to highlight the mental gymnastics conducted by slave owners (e.g., "how can a person count as a person for the Electoral College and the House, but not be considered a person otherwise?")

Much of what erodes the Constitution today is by and large due to a lack of respect for the document. The Tenth Amendment specifically states that any powers not specifically given to the Federal Government are reserved for the people and the states. But if we ignore that bit, we can justify all sorts of things!

Also Bob is fat and nobody will have sex with him.
Bob's like that kid in that Simpsons parody of "I'm just a Bill" ("I'm just an Amendment") that says, "Wow! If we change the constitution, we can make all sorts of crazy laws!"
 
Bob's like that kid in that Simpsons parody of "I'm just a Bill" ("I'm just an Amendment") that says, "Wow! If we change the constitution, we can make all sorts of crazy laws!"
Bob wouldn't know what the Constitution was if George Washington rolled it up and smacked him in the face with it. Bob wants an autocracy where the "right" people rule by fiat and crush the obsoletes.
 
We should probably be careful. Robert's powers could activate at any moment now!
1613822787617.png
 
Furiously hammering the "x" button about him ever having low blood sugar, too.
Alcohol can cause low blood glucose.

Elon Musk does not belong in Superior Future:
Untitled.png

Lisa Simpson thinks Musk is possibly the greatest living inventor. Audience inconsolable.
Untitled.png
Even this short clip shows how destructive Musk's rocket is. I have no fucking idea why people still consider Lisa the beacon of truth.

Untitled.png
I have no idea what the Middle East situation has to do with the China Virus.

Getting offended about a gun joke:
Untitled.png
The T-shirt is no more "illiterate" than the feminist mug about male tears.

And how illiterate do you have to be to call Trump a Nazi?
Untitled.png

Assorted political bullshit:
Untitled.png

+ + + +
Showbiz reminds Bobby of MAGA:
Untitled.png

Wanda:
=.png
Untitled.png

More MCU:
9.png

Spiderman:
Untitled.png

Godzilla:
Untitled.png

Bobby's orbiter 周瑜 (Walter Chaw) is taking a "twitter break"
9.png

And Bobby believes this might have to do with Lexi Alexander:
=.png
 
Matt Groening was never part of the dirtbag left.

He was never a they/them and never declared that anyone who disagreed with him was a psyop. Compare this to Peter Coffin and Sameera Khan's various jihads and the difference becomes clear.
Assorted political bullshit:
Untitled.png
Is Blob arguing for states' rights?

Now where have I seen white eugenicists argue that the federal government should have no power over the South before?

:thinking:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back