Sam Hyde

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Pissant Executives Are Cuckold Enthusiasts


people should just post this
Did anyone catch that Channing herself was running defense in the commen section of the video? Her excuse is that Null just wasn't patient enough to deal with her traumatic experiences because he himself struggles with trauma or some shit. Idk that shit barely makes sense to me. Her profile is youtube.com/@chancreager6855
nothing that interesting I guess
 
Did anyone catch that Channing herself was running defense in the commen section of the video? Her excuse is that Null just wasn't patient enough to deal with her traumatic experiences because he himself struggles with trauma or some shit. Idk that shit barely makes sense to me. Her profile is youtube.com/@chancreager6855
nothing that interesting I guess
Well, there's an old chinese saying that applies to Channing.
"Christmas example or get off the pot."
 

Carmack is right that cancel culture is similar to germ warfare but he's stupid to think that what Conservatives have been doing lately is in any ways an introduction of it into the ecosystem. It's not. It's an adaptation.

I stumbled across this blog post nearly a decade ago and it completely changed how I looked at virtue signaling and rage bait. It's a bit of a long read, but to summarize the claim, 'ragebait' and other similar phenomenon where the most divisive examples of an issue become the ones that receive the most attention can be explained with the idea that certain topics or ideas, like 'cancel culture' or 'wokeness', are not just abstract concepts. In the field of memetics, ideas are quasi-living things that work like bacteria in that they either spread or die out, and they must adapt to continue being adopted.

Ragebait fits into this model by working as a two-stage parasite like toxoplasmosis, where an action done by one group to another is then returned back to the original host in a new form. The blog post used the example of the War on Terror, where every time America bombed somewhere in the Middle East, people there became radicalized against the US and then were more willing to commit acts of terror, which would promote an American response, repeating the cycle.

All of this is preamble to say that if Carmack wants to characterize cancel culture being adopted by the Right as introducing something bad to the ecosystem, he's many, MANY years too late. That germ has been allowed to fester in the ecosystem for a long time, and it's gotten many opportunities to adapt over the years, to the point where many people on the Right are, in a sense, 'inoculated' against being canceled. Think about a time when a politician, celebrity, or everyday person was 'canceled' only to become a hero to the Right and end up doing just fine. You can probably name at least a dozen people if you tried. When it comes to a memetic parasite, it doesn't see Left or Right wing. It sees potential hosts and avenues of transmission. If it isn't transmitting as well among people on the Right, it's inevitable that it'd find a way to start wreaking havoc on the Left or else it would die out. That's what we're seeing now. The Right is mostly inoculated against cancelation. The Left isn't. They've relied on having the backing of the establishment to protect them, and the establishment will not tolerate incitement of 𝕍 becoming more commonplace. So the Left will either learn to adapt like the Right has to becoming 'cancel proof' (unlikely, since the establishment will do whatever it can to make sure the idea of 𝕍 doesn't become widespread and viable and the Left isn't remotely ready for that kind of smoke), drop the Trump assassination topic, or more grannies at Home Depot are going to lose their jobs.

You can debate whether or not this is a good thing or if it's hypocritical all you want, but one thing is for sure: the idea that this situation is something the Right is introducing into the ecosystem is demonstrably fucking retarded. Carmack is an idiot and Rage was, in fact, terrible.
 
Please tell me in full detail how one of Sam's ex-girlfriends (not Marky) being a junkie disproves that Sam fucked a 16 year old.
It doesn't. Channing didn't make thousands of alt accounts across various platforms over the last decade to spread the bombshell news that Sam had sex with a 16 year old in a state where the age of consent is 16. She made those accounts to say he beat and raped minors amongst other horrific things. One of her claims was that he had terabytes of homemade CP, whch he showed to his to his groupies and bragged about Ian Watkins style.
She just kept going and year after year the story would get worse. Then it started to just get downright silly and Channing's true intentions started to show: she has a personal vendetta against Sam and was growing incensed that he wasn't facing consequences for mistreating her personally. It was never about Marky. It was about a stolen Herman Miller chair, some Klipsch speakers and bad checks he may or may not have written. If you read the thread you'll realize very quickly that Channing is a scorned lover throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks. It's basically an eternal personal army request to ruin Sam's career using someone else's potential trauma, who doesn't seem to want to be involved.

Channing's infamous Marky pasta is so easy to disprove that even if some of it were true you would have plenty of reason to doubt it.
 
Why are people surprised that Sam is right wing the least surprising thing well over 50 to 60% of the US population is right wing the other is center left leftist progressives are actually a minority of the population in whole disproportionate power.
Contrary to popular belief people don't like being politically scolded by a bunch of pink hair fags


Markyposting is getting traction on Twitter now.
View attachment 6206983
Every single leftist big Twitter comment is the most obviously bot thing on the face of the planet does rumours have been swirling around for years and yet nothing has come of them and one of the accusers went on mad at the Internet high as a kite and discredited every other person who may have had legitimate complaints against Sam
 
agree with previous post theorizing that this could be a good sign that they got the series picked up by a proper online network/platform. Having graduated with honors from the MATI internet law school, I'm gonna guess that Adult Swim hasnt made any efforts to guard this IP from being uploaded to youtube/ used by whoever wants it since the show's cancellation. I think the rule is that if you have a copyright, you have to treat all infringements the same and go after them, not just pick and choose, or else your claim to copywright can be lost. Maybe Sam had a lawyer look it all over once they decided to film and was told that there was no legit claim and sam figured that if AS did in fact sue, he could leverage the legal battle for content and to force AS to deal with all the unpleasantness that comes with forcing the guy whose show they cancelled to never be able to use his own idea again even though they dont even want it at a time when Sam has never been more popular and well known.

Still, Sam is a retard for not anticipating that any company which would agree to put on the show would also refuse to release it with such a huge risk of even dealing with a lawsuit.
 
MDE Presents: World Peace was not a good title anyway, too arty and low concept from the outset to get on Rogan, this was a chance to revamp it as it was supposed to be to begin with
The Sam Hyde Show or Hyde's Show
tshs.jpg

Nick could do Charlie Murphy, Charls could do Donnell Rawlings etc etc
 
agree with previous post theorizing that this could be a good sign that they got the series picked up by a proper online network/platform. Having graduated with honors from the MATI internet law school, I'm gonna guess that Adult Swim hasnt made any efforts to guard this IP from being uploaded to youtube/ used by whoever wants it since the show's cancellation. I think the rule is that if you have a copyright, you have to treat all infringements the same and go after them, not just pick and choose, or else your claim to copywright can be lost. Maybe Sam had a lawyer look it all over once they decided to film and was told that there was no legit claim and sam figured that if AS did in fact sue, he could leverage the legal battle for content and to force AS to deal with all the unpleasantness that comes with forcing the guy whose show they cancelled to never be able to use his own idea again even though they dont even want it at a time when Sam has never been more popular and well known.

Still, Sam is a retard for not anticipating that any company which would agree to put on the show would also refuse to release it with such a huge risk of even dealing with a lawsuit.
They could just censor out all of the titles and call it Untitled Project. They could get creative enough with it so it still looks cool, and would ironically give the show more credibility because everyone would know the back story anyway. Season 1 was overly censored, mostly because of the large blocks of texts, but some of the smaller ones added to the overall aesthetic.

But yeah, they need to be extremely careful because a lawsuit could potentially get the entire show shut down. For example someone in animation works on an entire project by himself but since he started the project at a studio he used to work for, or used certain assets from the studio, the company claims full ownership of the project and they shelve it permanently. Removing the assets at the end stage isn't good enough since they were used as the backbone for the entire project.

I could see AS arguing that since the titles were created for a sequel to a show they own, using the same aesthetic and by the same crew, they can't use any of it.

Maybe it will just be called [the James Fields symbol] and credited to The Group Formerly Known as Million Dollar Extreme. It worked for Prince.
 
agree with previous post theorizing that this could be a good sign that they got the series picked up by a proper online network/platform. Having graduated with honors from the MATI internet law school, I'm gonna guess that Adult Swim hasnt made any efforts to guard this IP from being uploaded to youtube/ used by whoever wants it since the show's cancellation. I think the rule is that if you have a copyright, you have to treat all infringements the same and go after them, not just pick and choose, or else your claim to copywright can be lost. Maybe Sam had a lawyer look it all over once they decided to film and was told that there was no legit claim and sam figured that if AS did in fact sue, he could leverage the legal battle for content and to force AS to deal with all the unpleasantness that comes with forcing the guy whose show they cancelled to never be able to use his own idea again even though they dont even want it at a time when Sam has never been more popular and well known.

Still, Sam is a retard for not anticipating that any company which would agree to put on the show would also refuse to release it with such a huge risk of even dealing with a lawsuit.
The show is still up for sale on YouTube and Vudu/fandango at home so Adult Swim is still making money of of it some how. I wouldn't be surprised if WB are just going to vault it like their other stuff or remove it all together.
 
It doesn't. Channing didn't make thousands of alt accounts across various platforms over the last decade to spread the bombshell news that Sam had sex with a 16 year old in a state where the age of consent is 16. She made those accounts to say he beat and raped minors amongst other horrific things. One of her claims was that he had terabytes of homemade CP, whch he showed to his to his groupies and bragged about Ian Watkins style.
She just kept going and year after year the story would get worse. Then it started to just get downright silly and Channing's true intentions started to show: she has a personal vendetta against Sam and was growing incensed that he wasn't facing consequences for mistreating her personally. It was never about Marky. It was about a stolen Herman Miller chair, some Klipsch speakers and bad checks he may or may not have written. If you read the thread you'll realize very quickly that Channing is a scorned lover throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks. It's basically an eternal personal army request to ruin Sam's career using someone else's potential trauma, who doesn't seem to want to be involved.

Channing's infamous Marky pasta is so easy to disprove that even if some of it were true you would have plenty of reason to doubt it.
The way Channing kept upping and upping her lies was crazy. Like she really thought people here were going to hear "Sam is a gay pedophile who loves wearing diapers and shows people child porn casually" and think "oh okay".
 
MDE Presents: World Peace was not a good title anyway, too arty and low concept from the outset to get on Rogan, this was a chance to revamp it as it was supposed to be to begin with
The Sam Hyde Show or Hyde's Show
View attachment 6209500
Nick could do Charlie Murphy, Charls could do Donnell Rawlings etc etc
MDE has always been Sam, Nick and Charls, it needs to be marketed at such. Hell, it’s good for everyone’s sake not to market it as specialty Sam hyde’s project
 
MDE has always been Sam, Nick and Charls, it needs to be marketed at such. Hell, it’s good for everyone’s sake not to market it as specialty Sam hyde’s project
even Cumtown figured out TAFS was the way to go, this fixation with the MDE and WP branding is a dud
Eric Andre, Steve Wilkos, Steve Harvey, everybody figured it out
 
  • Agree
Reactions: semitooth
Back