Even if I ignored our past exchange you're still concocting a dreadful philosophy that places men and women into a world of hurt, depriving them of their reproductive rights
@Lord Edge of Leetworth I just wanted to point out you are being such a catty little bitch in the last few pages (which are what I read), and are so unfocused in your ramblings, that it was only by implication that I figured out what your dumbshit amoral opinion of the matter is you're so far down the rabbit hole seething at people
Look, if you don't want to get pregnant, you shouldn't have sex in the first place. The whole point of sex is reproduction. The enjoyement you get from sex is to encourage you to have more kids. That's how the nature works. That's how sexual reproduction evolved.
And if you really really want to have sex with a man but don't want to get pregnant, you should follow your period cycles and choose an appropriate time for that. Avoiding getting pregnant is that easy.
"You can't have this opinion if you're a woman and if you do, then you're not a woman."
Such a great logic right there.
What happened to that "Only biological woman are allowed to express their opinions on abortion" thingy? I guess not having "the right opinions" makes me a lesser woman now.
@Lord Edge of Leetworth I just wanted to point out you are being such a catty little bitch in the last few pages (which are what I read), and are so unfocused in your ramblings, that it was only by implication that I figured out what your dumbshit amoral opinion of the matter is you're so far down the rabbit hole seething at people
You're offering me a naturalistic fallacy. Nature itself does not grant us purpose; it simply retains traits that flourish on Earth's niche. We're not endowed to enjoy sex any more than we are gifted with the faculties to abort its consequences. Your life is your own.
Of course, an anti-natalist would know jack shit about nature and purpose of the living. You deliberately avoid my point here also. I told you the consequences of sex. I told you an easy way to not getting pregnant. Why not having sex is not an option for you?
I'm pretty sure your ideologies are more hurtful to other women than whatever I believe in. You guys believe that:
-Fetuses are not alive and are parasites (How the fuck something can be not alive and a parasite at the same time?? Follow your own logic).
-One shouldn't suffer the consequences of sleeping around (Learn to be responsible for God's sake. You're a fucking adult).
-All men are evil (Being evil isn't special to just one sex. Anyone can be evil).
It all seems backwards and illogical to me. It's also a very nihilistic way to look on life.
Btw, here's a reminder on how "compassionate" pro-choicers are. But this is probably funny to you guys:
Of course, an anti-natalist would know jack shit about nature and purpose of the living. You deliberately avoid my point here also. I told you the consequences of sex. I told you an easy way to not getting pregnant. Why not having sex is not an option for you?
And something tells me you never went to school. Didn't they teach you these stuff?
I know that you're lesbian. You will never have kids (Cats don't count).
I'm pretty sure your ideologies are more hurtful to other women than whatever I believe in. You guys believe that:
-Fetuses are not alive and are parasites (How the fuck something can be not alive and a parasite at the same time?? Follow your own logic).
-One shouldn't suffer the consequences of sleeping around (Learn to be responsible for God's sake. You're a fucking adult).
-All men are evil (Being evil isn't special to just one sex. Anyone can be evil).
It all seems backwards and illogical to me. It's also a very nihilistic way to look on life.
Btw, here's a reminder on how "compassionate" pro-choicers are. But this is probably funny to you guys:
Of course, an anti-natalist would know jack shit about nature and purpose of the living. You deliberately avoid my point here also. I told you the consequences of sex. I told you an easy way to not getting pregnant. Why not having sex is not an option for you?
I'm pretty sure your ideologies are more hurtful to other women than whatever I believe in. You guys believe that:
-Fetuses are not alive and are parasites (How the fuck something can be not alive and a parasite at the same time?? Follow your own logic).
Of course, an anti-natalist would know jack shit about nature and purpose of the living. You deliberately avoid my point here also. I told you the consequences of sex. I told you an easy way to not getting pregnant. Why not having sex is not an option for you?
I'm not avoiding your "point" I'm denying its existence. Also not an anti-natalist. Are you a femcel? This tirade gives makes me feel that the answer is "yes."
Whether plants actually feel pain or not is still pretty debated from what I can tell the way they respond to stimuli indicate they do to some small degree.
If they're "not alive" how come they become alive after birth? What kind of a magic occurs there, "science" believer?
Lol plants are alive as much as you are, dummy. They do every activity you do in your daily life. They even do the wonderful thing called photosynthesis. No "non-living" being can do these things.
They're not the ones who say "It's just a clump of cells".
Or "It's not even alive anyways".
Or "It's a parasite".
Why don't you try saying those to women who recently had miscarriages? Wonder how they will react?
I'm not avoiding your "point" I'm denying its existence. Also not an anti-natalist. Are you a femcel? This tirade gives makes me feel that the answer is "yes."
Alright my sex-starved beggar. I'll give you a little masculine attention. "Look if you don't want to get pregnant, you shouldn't have sex in the first place" is not an argument, just puritanical hubris. Naturalistic fallacies (e.g. the point of sex is to breed) are reductive nonsense. If these fallacies were acceptable we could be defending infanticide right now. But we're not discussing infants. We're discussing foetuses: Clusters of cells devoid of persons and all of their observable properties. And to be very specific this doesn't address late-term foetuses, just early-term foetuses (i.e. 24 weeks max.) Pro-lifers want to abolish harmless, safe and simple abortions for women that aren't even carrying persons within themselves. Hence, pro-lifers are infringing upon a woman's reproductive rights without good reason. They simply want to control women. And that is morally abhorrent. Are you satisfied?
The foster care system is tasked with protecting the welfare of children suffering from abuse and neglect. However, many children taken from their families are subjected to sexual abuse and left in a more vulnerable and traumatized state. Several localized studies demonstrate the startling...
But seriously good point I think abortion should be more of last resort in these types of things like bill clinton said it should be legal,safe and rare the first thing to do is allowing for contraceptive methods and sex ed then creating a safer foster care and adoption system then increasing welfare spending and expanding the social safety net Remember the main reason women abort their fetus is because they can not economically provide for it.
This is common science But republicans will screech about ‘muh big gubmit bad’ the reason I dislike these republican ‘’pro-lifers’’ is that they clearly just want to punish women for having sex and not actually do anything to remove abortion as a primary need nor do they care about kids.