The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

[IAmNotAlpharius]

I have family who came over from Ireland and who remember such things well. Whether that photo is fake or not, there were such signs up, and there was rampant anti-Irish sentiment. The writing in that sign looks very modern, not like older handwriting at all.

There was a kid who blew that guardian article out of the water and made a journo rage.

A random thought but there's a new and improved monkeypox making the rounds in Africa. 1 in 20 mortality rate, and spreads by simple skin contact (no assfucking required). Sweden just had their first case, brought in by a "refugee" that's been on a vacation in the same shithole it claimed to have originally escaped from.

UK's gonna get virologicaly enriched in near future. Those of you on normie Bongistan social networks... might be a good time to start raising health awareness among the NPCs before it happens. With extra mentions about where that shit started, and who brings it in.

immigrants are never vectors for disease like covid. How racist of you to suggest otherwise.

 

[D.A. d. nial]

British police barge into civilian’s home and arrests him over comments he made under a post on Facebook.

View attachment 6312232

This whole time I had completely forgotten cops in the UK don't carry guns? What? I assumed the police still would, so, you know, they could do their job? How are any laws enforced without the threat of immediate violence? What? Huh? How?

 

[Karen of Human Resources]

This whole time I had completely forgotten cops in the UK don't carry guns? What? I assumed the police still would, so, you know, they could do their job? How are any laws enforced without the threat of immediate violence? What? Huh? How?

In Northern Ireland they're all armed, but thats a whole other situation.

Some cops carry tasers, but yes most of them are unarmed. When dealing with armed suspects they either wait for cops with guns to arrive, or the do what they can with their hands. You will get far less reaction to a cop being killed than a member of "Our Communities"

US cops are there to protect and serve. UK police are there to "Keep the King's Peace". Very different priorities.

Not to say some UK cops don't do heroic things, but they're not expected to intervene the same way other European or North American ones are.

 

[D.A. d. nial]

In Northern Ireland they're all armed, but thats a whole other situation.

Some cops carry tasers, but yes most of them are unarmed. When dealing with armed suspects they either wait for cops with guns to arrive, or the do what they can with their hands. You will get far less reaction to a cop being killed than a member of "Our Communities"

US cops are there to protect and serve. UK police are there to "Keep the King's Peace". Very different priorities.

Not to say some UK cops don't do heroic things, but they're not expected to intervene the same way other European or North American ones are.

So why comply, ever?

 

[clipartfan92]

US cops are there to protect and serve.

That's a motto that LAPD came up with in the 60s and has no basis in reality. Police in the US are law enforcement officers, their main goal is to enforce laws, regardless of what they want to dress it up as. The US Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that police in the US have no duty to protect an individual.

The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.

NYT
All US law enforcement officers are traitors who will piss all over the US Constitution in order to keep their pensions.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

The absolute STATE of niggercattle. Fuck your coworkers.

The BBC ran a story about ukraine invading russia using british tanks. The comments were variations of "good, send in the troops" and "good, use more devastating weapons (storm shadow cruise missiles) on the kremlin"

Good to know these niggercattle spastics who want rioters jailed always want a nuclear war. I would shower every single one of them.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

So why comply, ever?

Because the endgame involves you having to kill the police. Sure, you can 'not comply' and beat the shit out of an officer that comes to your house and for sure they'll probably fuck off for half an hour, then an armed response team are going to come and shoot you lol.

The police say that they don't "Police by force". But that was only the case about a hundred years ago, now they do, they just dress it up in the look of twee policing. Very gay.

 

[WSPWSPWSPWSP]

The question I ask myself is: Are the public going to riot if there is another lockdown forced upon us? The last couple weeks have clearly shown the native population are fed up, so everyone being forced back into their homes are going to stoke the fires.

Will the 2 tier policing state be extended to that? Will the british be punished for leaving their homes while the Muzzies get to walk the streets freely?

 

[Karen of Human Resources]

So why comply, ever?

Oh, they do react. They just don't react as their first response.

If you don't comply with an order to drop the knife in France they'll just shoot you.

The British are just more bureaucratic, They'll ask you to drop the knife, maybe use a taser if you try using it on them but otherwise will hang back. Only as the very last resort, when you're in the process of trying to stab someone will they call armed police to shoot. And even then, that doesn't always happen.

So far from what I've seen of incidents that made the news, random members of the public are usually more likely to be the ones to use lethal force to stop these kinds of things than the police. Not that I'm recommending that at all, the London Bridge incident where that guy stabbed one of the attackers with some sort of ivory tusk came to mind.

You do have a right to use lethal force in self defence in the UK, but with many caveats as you might expect.

That's a motto that LAPD came up with in the 60s and has no basis in reality. Police in the US are law enforcement officers, their main goal is to enforce laws, regardless of what they want to dress it up as

My mistake, but that is what I'm getting at.

US Police are enforcers. The law is (supposed) to be the law and is to be followed to the letter.

UK police are more like custodians. They will not enforce laws that carry a risk of causing even more disorder. They, unlike US police apparently, do have a positive duty to prevent harm to an extent, but this always comes second to preventing disorder.

This is literally why they didn't take action against the grooming gangs, they proposed doing so to the Crown Prosecution Service and were explicitly told not to because it could cause trouble within "The community".

 

[D.A. d. nial]

They will not enforce laws that carry a risk of causing even more disorder.

This is literally why they didn't take action against the grooming gangs, they proposed doing so to the Crown Prosecution Service and were explicitly told not to because it could cause trouble with the Muslim community.

I always hated the british for their accents, arrogance and general pretensious aura. It always felt like I was being condescended to by some kind of handicapped bug whenever I've interacted with them. Suddenly it all hits on a deeper level. England deserves to burn. Inshallah.

~ The Rhode Island District Attorney's Office

 

[InteracialBowelSyndrome]

In light of all the two-tier bullshit trials we've seen lately, I'd like to remind that anyone actually caught to immediatley plead "Not guilty".

Those getting fascist and overly harsh sentences are being given them because the evil government and plod are trying to send a message.

But the courts are still bogged down and underfunded.

So make it worse. Pleading guilty will only ensure a disgusting sentence in a kangaroo court.

Waste their time, money, and resources.

 

[WSPWSPWSPWSP]

In light of all the two-tier bullshit trials we've seen lately, I'd like to remind that anyone actually caught to immediatley plead "Not guilty".

To add to that, if you get brought in for questioning, "No comment" to each question will suffice.

They will attempt to befriend you, potentially even coerce you. Whatever you do, just answer with "no comment". Save the talking for the lawyer.

 

[femboy fart huffer]

Crashing the benefits system wouldn't work, reforming it on the other hand would.

Don't forget a lot of people that have a lot of free time and nothing to lose (ie the people that are most likely to riot) are those on unemployment. You're not going to convince the people that are on the dole to remove the dole. It would be incredibly simple to reform though. Literally just say if you do not have ancestry in this country from before 1900 then you are banned from every social system, no benefits, no nhs, no council housing, nothing, unless you are in a high paying job that pays more tax than you would use. The only thing you get from the government is a one way plane ticket to a suitable country (not just dumping them in france or ireland or whatever). If the only reason that these people are coming over here is to work and have better opportunities then they should work and that's it. If these people are so beneficial for our economy as the propagandists would have us believe then there should be no issue with blocking them from accessing any socialist systems right? We built this system, native people built this system, they paid into it, they supported it through it's issues, and now they are unable to properly use it anymore because other people came into this country and ruined it. How long's the waiting list for your gp? How many people are on the council house waiting list near you? How many people do you know that are unable to find work or that are forced to live on disability that have to pick if they want breakfast or heating?

Spoiler: I'll say some personal shit that's kinda long.

I have a family member, she's a wonderful person. She used to work full time, however she had a kid who was born disabled, full on 24/7 care, will never leave home or work, in a humane society he would just be shot basically. My family member is forced to live on disability + carer's + unemployment (i think at least, I go to see her to raise her spirits not to talk about her finances). She still only just manages to scrape by. Her husband fucked off, never seemed like he cared about her or his son. And fuck knows she's not getting remarried, everyone knows that single mothers getting remarried is hard as shit, imagine if the child of that mother is incredibly disabled. If I went out and spent a week's worth of what I put in my savings to buy her things for the few hobbies she has then she would probably break down crying and hug me to the point of pain. The government has decided that the hippocratic oath is redundant, vets are better at 'do no harm' than doctors are because at least the vets will euthanise those that need it. So why should she be in this position? Why should she have to be buying the reduced food that's at the end of it's shelflife? Why should she be essentially banned from any real hobbies because anything more expensive than a jigsaw or a ball of wool is too expensive for her? She's in a shitty position that she can't help, so is her son. The point of this system is that people like her, people who through no fault of their own are forced into a shitty situation, are supported by the system and allowed to have something resembling a good existence. So why is she forced to live like that? If she had to pay rent she simply would not be able to live at all. My cousin used to look after his grandparents, our grandma had some sort of muscle atrophy type problem that basically ended up with her being bedbound, the medicine that they gave her for her muscles made her incontinent completely (i think, either the medicine or the condition itself). When he spoke to the doctors they told him that there was basically nothing that they could do, they could give him disposable inserts for underwear and that was it. That's going to do jack shit for someone who would need the bedlinen changing multiple times a day. For our grandma to have a semblence of dignity and to not be rolling around in her own shit as she wasted away and waited for an inevitable death she needed pullups. Inserts would be too little, and proper diapers would be simply too much effort for her, a woman with no muscle cannot lift herself or move herself properly, it would be simply too much exertion for her to do several times a day even with her grandson helping her do it. She needed something that could be easily pulled up and not require any serious exertion. Carer's benefits are £80 a week, do you have any idea how expensive pull up disposable underwear is? You'd be talking about £30 a week for those alone. Throw in the fact that you need to use the washing machine every single day, and on a high temperature at that, that shit adds up too. Throw in the food that she needs to eat and you've spent all the carer's benefits if not more. That's to merely exist, no luxuries for the dying woman, that's the entire government allowance spent just to feed her and to buy something that should be on the nhs anyway. No fags for the dying woman, no jigsaws, no bingo, not even a fucking pack of werthers originals.I will say that she did have a pension though so it wasn't too bad. Don't forget that you're also now unemployed too, you can't work a job and look after someone who is bedbound, you have to be there 24/7 but you've still got to buy yourself food and the petrol costs to get there, don't forget council tax road tax breathing tax tv tax all that shit. Once again if he had to pay rent they would have been homeless. All three of these people deserved better. They weren't people who simply couldn't be fucked to work, all three did work, my cousin's back at work now. These are people that were fucked over by circumstance and bad luck. And they were given the absolute minimum. Because the benefits system is being stretched to breaking point. You categorically cannot have a system where money is handed out for free without a strict immigration policy. If you tell people that you can come to a country, even illegally, and be given free shit then you can't then be surprised that an influx of people come into the country illegally to take that free shit until it dries up. Labour SHOULD be the people who are supporting those systems, yet they're the ones doing the most damage to it. If the fucking tories are doing a better job with the socialist systems then you have failed to an extent that is hard to put in words. Why should I pay taxes? I would say to help the country, to allow for government infrastructure and for that money to be given to the people that need it. Neither of those things happen. I might as well just not pay taxes and give it to my family instead, at least then it is going to actually help someone who has been fucked over in life and deserves the best, as well as her fucking disabled son. Let me weeb out for a moment, Japan has what I consider to be a near perfect immigration system. Can't speak the language to a decent level; fuck off. Don't have employment lined up for the day you step off the plane; fuck off. Don't have immediate plans for housing; fuck off. If you do go move to Japan you cannot receive anything from the government until you have contributed to society for years. I think that's correct at least.

May have been fake, at least according to someone in the Guardian.

Bullshit 'fake' my ass. There has been an anti irish sentiment in England for as long as it's been a country. You're less than a century away from 'irish need not apply' being a common phrase. There are people still alive to this day that were refused work because they were Irish.

I will once again state that there is a distinct irony of Americans thinking we don't have the guts. ... you guys still have access to guns

If we had the same access arms that americans do then we would have seen shootings motivated by this shit a decade ago.

Those getting fascist and overly harsh sentences are being given them because the evil government and plod are trying to send a message.

Remember if the harsh sentences are to 'send a message' that means that if you do this then you will probably not be treated as hard. They are sending a message that this is the worst you will get, not that this is the average. It'll be the average for a while but then they'll ease off. Not that being able to 'make an example' out of someone should even be legal, ruin someone's life for what? Instantly plead not guilty, force them to give you a trial with a jury, I know if I ever get roped in for jury duty on this shit I will be saying the guy isn't guilty regardless of what he said. The police have jack shit on you, even if they have a screenshot of a post that 'you' made, screenshots are easy to fake and that isn't even your account; that's someone else impersonating you. What are they going to do? Subpoena elon or null lol, good luck.

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

British police barge into civilian’s home and arrests him over comments he made under a post on Facebook.

Remember, these two individuals are unarmed. Probably alone, and left their vehicle unguarded. All it takes is one individual with a brick or car escape tool to break that vehicle's windows and smash up the side mirrors.

If you wanna take it a step further, someone can throw a brick at their heads and be around the corner before they know what hit them.

UK police are more like custodians. They will not enforce laws that carry a risk of causing even more disorder. They, unlike US police apparently, do have a positive duty to prevent harm to an extent, but this always comes second to preventing disorder.

This is literally why they didn't take action against the grooming gangs, they proposed doing so to the Crown Prosecution Service and were explicitly told not to because it could cause trouble within "The community".

You are literally saying that all the British public has to do every time a couple cops turn up to arrest someone for wrong think, is assault them, beat the shit out of them and burn their vehicles. After a while it will become clear arresting someone for wrong think "causes trouble within the community." At which point one of two things happens: A) Cops stop arresting people for wrong think, or B) and more likely they crack down even harder, proving the "don't want to cause disorder" was a lie

Nothing will change until people are free to speak their minds. People won't be free to speak their minds until cops are afraid to arrest people for doing so.

 

[Karen of Human Resources]

To add to that, if you get brought in for questioning, "No comment" to each question will suffice.

Disclaimer: I am not your lawyer, criminal law is not my specialty, this is not advice for anyone to follow.

No Comment in the UK is more situational than elsewhere

Nobody in the UK has a right to silence. By the same token the Police, or other bodies that conducts criminal interviews, cannot usually compel you to speak. This is a "usually", because there are a small number of cases where not answering is a brand new crime in itself but these tend to be more white collar stuff.

It's distinct because where a US Court cannot use your silence as evidence, a British Court absolutley can.

If an interviewer thinks that a particular question is essential to an investigation, and it must be a singular question they can justify as relevant, they can issue a "Special Warning". If you refuse to answer it, the court (should they accept the warning is valid) is free to interpret your silence however it wishes. As you can imagine, that's often an admission of guilt.

You are literally saying that all the British public has to do every time a couple cops turn up to arrest someone for wrong think, is assault them, beat the shit out of them and burn their vehicles. After a while it will become clear arresting someone for wrong think "causes trouble within the community." At which point one of two things happens: A) Cops stop arresting people for wrong think, or B) and more likely they crack down even harder, proving the "don't want to cause disorder" was a lie

@World Famous Quasi Payer
I'm not saying people should do that, people shouldn't do that because they will putting themselves and others at serious risk, but it is a genuine factor the prosecution considers.

It's not even so much harm done to the Police, in fact assaulting cops generally has a much higher tolerance level than other members of the public and not something that usually makes it to court. Again, people should not be doing this either.

It would be more BLM level. Entire communities spilling out, as they did recently in Leeds. Blocking roads, damaging the local economy, giving the impression that minorities are being threatened which in turn might inspire other groups to get angry too.

There's a lot to unpack when it comes to protected characteristics, strength of community responses and just general mood of the public and it can change quite quickly.

 

[3deadniggers]

Gypos have been assaulting the cops for decades. Any time they try to arrest one of them or go to retrieve a stolen car for the insurance company the gypo kids will pelt them with rocks and adults will thump them. They will back off and call in a riot squad who will come in like you saw on the streets. They're used to dealing with gypos so you need better tactics than fists and rocks if you want to repel a police kidnapping. You would have to be willing to kill the coppers and destroy their vehicles then scatter because anything less will get riot squads then guns brought into play.

Not saying you couldn't punch the cops and leg it, you could and live a decent life off the grid if you had a way to earn money under the table. But an area teaming up to remove the cop's ability to police an area is very difficult and I would expect Muslim gangs to appear and start knifing people since that's the current tactic for opposing the government.

 

[Small G genocide]

Might be nothing, might be an interesting development:
Tommy Robinson is currently on Tim Pool's "The Culture War" show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWaijqByWkw

Couple of hundred thousand eyeballs can't be a bad thing.

 

[A-Logato]

Tommy Robinson is currently on Tim Pool's "The Culture War" show.

Don't tell him about Tim's opinion on Israel.

 

[Nine year old waifu]

when dealing with the ontologically evil

Humans are not "ontologically evil", they are just evil. Rate me however you want, but I do believe there are bad tactics, and not just bad targets.
So many ITT sounding like the BML/Pro-Palestine twitter idiots who talk a lot about the queer-anarcho-communist revolution that they will fight for that will start soon, for real y'all, just any day!!

These things take time. One side is more prone to get stabby and rapey and is overall less appealing the more people are forced to live near them. People need to get over their mental block of admitting that the thing that we are told "never happens" keeps happening every day.
Right now many of you are coming off as lunatics who just want to go full Rwanda genocide on the immigrants. This won't win over anyone, and will lose support from the majority.

English middle-class women were okay with the trans stuff until it started appearing in their own workplace, their changing rooms, and until they started having kids and see it first hand. A greasy, fat, slouchy, old Pakistani man taking for a walk his wife wearing full-face covering and with their young, pre-pubescent child (also wearing face covering) is our own best advocate. Let them speak for themselves, and make sure you amplify their message.

Who is Allah? I know what he told the prophet Mohammed and what that means for us and your children.

What’s the process for the gimmigrants flooding into England to become citizens? Is it easily granted to them?

(*UK. There is no English passport. Things like crime and education are managed differently between Scotland, England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Btw, this is why they have their own parliament - all but England, as the "English" parliament is the UK one)

• Simple "Life in the UK test"
• English test, with B1 minimum (this is ridiculous if you know what it means. It is barely being able to ask for water at a restaurant*)
  • Language sperging:I know a bit about different language levels and what they translate to in real life. Universities will ask for a B2/C1, when it is simply not enough. To be able to comfortably live, you need a solid C1. There will still be areas where your vocabulary is lacking, but you are now at the stage where you can understand the meaning of new words from context. If you start with a C1, and are not too retarded or isolate yourself, you will improve. C2 also does not mean "native speaker with good language skills". Even if you have a really good C2, there will always be things regarding English that you won't be able to get like the native speakers, like Shakespeare and other "old English" literature.
• Be a resident in the UK for 5 years
• Fee for application (about £1.000)

However many don't ever get citizenship as they would lose their native one (eg india does not allow dual citizenship) *I think that if it would mean to lose citizenship, you should not be given UK citizenship
Also, commonwealth citizens can vote in elections from day 0. This is not true for pre-Brexit EU migrants that have "indefinite leave to remain" (ie "Settled Status), where they can vote for local elections but not for UK Parliament! (New EU immigrants cannot even vote for local elections, with exceptions for Spain and a few other countries).

Therefore, what you should equally, if not more, concerned about is the "indefinite leave to remain".

It gives you the right to live, work and study here for as long as you like, and apply for benefits if you’re eligible. You can use it to apply for British citizenship.

I would really encourage everyone to read that page. The list of eligibility is very very long. The options make it a lot easier for Commonwealth citizens, which include 56 countries (India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Rwanda, etc..).
One eligibility option is if you are linked to someone else who has ILR, not even citizenship! Literally bring your whole extended family with little problems! You don't need to become a citizen, but can vote in parliamentary elections!

There are then other ad-hoc schemes such as Windrush and I think also this "right to abode" one https://www.gov.uk/right-of-abode/commonwealth-citizens

I don't have exact statistics, but I don't think most immigrants here have refugee status. Rather, they are given some interim status to let them stay until they get leave to remain and then they can stay here indefinitely.

 

[FedPostalService]

A random thought but there's a new and improved monkeypox making the rounds in Africa. 1 in 20 mortality rate, and spreads by simple skin contact (no assfucking required). Sweden just had their first case, brought in by a "refugee" that's been on a vacation in the same shithole it claimed to have originally escaped from.

UK's gonna get virologicaly enriched in near future. Those of you on normie Bongistan social networks... might be a good time to start raising health awareness among the NPCs before it happens. With extra mentions about where that shit started, and who brings it in.

Tin foil hat moment: I think they’re outright lying about transition of the virus after getting caught just not saying for a long time last out break and lying by omission as they cried about doing it to avoid homophobia last time.