The General Thread

My favorite is the Whopper. The amount of mayo really sells the burger for me. My dad's a big fan of DQ though, namely for the chili-dogs. I like the Flamethrower though.
 
Chili dogs,"flame throwers", and ice cream.
Oh I see what you are doing there DQ.
 
My metabolism is off the charts and I'm a busybody, and because of that I tend to cram junk into my face hole when I really should not be doing so. But! It does come in handy when I go out with friends or family and they want to know the best places to eat. I'm the family's sophisticated connoisseur who is also far too passionate about mundane things.

I remember going to a Champa Burger Works as it first opened; I predicted a decline in its meal quality within the year. BAM! It occurred a good five months later.



In other news, mother and I were rewatching the Denver/Dallas on the DVR and we still cannot get over Manning faking his pass and making a break for the end zone. We literally stated mere minutes before the play how we rarely see him run the ball in, it was rather magical. Everyone went crazy trying to prevent a score, and then the camera just pans over in shock to Manning running in. Possibly one of the funniest plays I've seen in quite some time.


BTWHAHAYOURTEAMLOSTSUCKITREDi'mkiddingunoiluvubaybe. c:
 
I just bought Saints Row 4 and some DLC for it. :heart-full:
C'mon Steam, install already.
 
The Tyrant said:
BTWHAHAYOURTEAMLOSTSUCKITREDi'mkiddingunoiluvubaybe. c:
You and Pikonic. Freaking Judases... Why don't the two of you just fuck and get it over with?
noidon'treallymeanitiloveubothbuticlearlyluvumorethanpikonicandikindalikethebroncostoosoitwasn'tatotalloss. C:
 
The Hunter said:
The Tyrant said:
BTWHAHAYOURTEAMLOSTSUCKITREDi'mkiddingunoiluvubaybe. c:
You and Pikonic. Freaking Judases... Why don't the two of you just fuck and get it over with?
noidon'treallymeanitiloveubothbuticlearlyluvumorethanpikonicandikindalikethebroncostoosoitwasn'tatotalloss. C:
I saw that you BASTARD, KISS MY TINY BLUE ASS!!
loljksinceeveryoneiswritingsmallifeellikeishouldtoo
 
Forgot to mention that thing that I was talking about for the past few days.

Had my big huge discussion on Federalism v. Anti-Federalism today. I had notes and talking points prepared. The anti-federalists mopped the floor with us. Why?

I mentioned there's this autistic guy who sits next to me that goes off on tangents for no real reason. Before I could say anything, he made himself the group speaker and talked forever. What did he talk about? He said that the US constitution would guarantee equality for all because it stated that every person was created equal and that slavery would be abolished under the new constitution. Not to mention everyone on my side of the room is mentally retarded or something. Nobody said anything about it. Everyone agreed with him. Nobody studied. The only guy who said a thing was someone with a stutter that said that what the guy was saying was totally true. The anti-federalists pointed out that what he said was clearly bullshit. They scored a point. Then they said that a flaw with the constitution was that it didn't have a bill of rights, which they were right about. It was a little hard to make a rebuttal to that... so nobody did. They scored another point. Then they made the mistake of saying that God was nowhere to be found in the constitution. Our side responded by calling out the fact that they were calling for freedom of religion, yet were including what was assumed to be a Christian god into the constitution which would establish a national religion which was something both of us were supposed to be against. They replied with, "God is a universal idea and the same in all religions." We were still calling them out on the whole separation of church and state thing. Then Mr. autisticpants pointed out that separation of church and state only took off in the twentieth century and that it wasn't really enforced during the drafting of the constitution. Somehow, the anti's scored a point. Then they fucked up again by saying, "if you're so against religion being a part of the government, then why is, "in God we trust," on our money?" I immediately said, "that was in the fifties. Eisenhower did that." What did the girl on the other side say? "THAT'S NOT THE POINT. IF YOU BELIEVE SO MUCH IN FEDERALISM, WHY IS IT ON THE MONEY?" The professor explained it, thoroughly. She still retorted with, "THAT'S NOT THE POINT IF IT WAS IN THE FIFTIES." Like, holy shit, she would not stop. Finally, I spoke out and would have probably earned us a point if the argument wasn't cut short. I said, "the whole point of this revolt against the English and creation of this government was to escape the tyranny of the king. Federalism guarantees that the states and federal government are equal and in balance, meaning no other government can take complete power of the union. Federalism is Tyranny-proof." Then things were back on track. Appropriate questions were asked, appropriate answers were given. Class was dismissed.

The next class argument is scheduled to be North V. South in the Civil War. Lotta fun that's gonna be...
 
The Hunter said:
The next class argument is scheduled to be North V. South in the Civil War. Lotta fun that's gonna be...
I have often wondered how the South teaches the civil war.
 
The Hunter said:
Forgot to mention that thing that I was talking about for the past few days.

Had my big huge discussion on Federalism v. Anti-Federalism today. I had notes and talking points prepared. The anti-federalists mopped the floor with us. Why?

I mentioned there's this autistic guy who sits next to me that goes off on tangents for no real reason. Before I could say anything, he made himself the group speaker and talked forever. What did he talk about? He said that the US constitution would guarantee equality for all because it stated that every person was created equal and that slavery would be abolished under the new constitution. Not to mention everyone on my side of the room is mentally retarded or something. Nobody said anything about it. Everyone agreed with him. Nobody studied. The only guy who said a thing was someone with a stutter that said that what the guy was saying was totally true. The anti-federalists pointed out that what he said was clearly bullshit. They scored a point. Then they said that a flaw with the constitution was that it didn't have a bill of rights, which they were right about. It was a little hard to make a rebuttal to that... so nobody did. They scored another point. Then they made the mistake of saying that God was nowhere to be found in the constitution. Our side responded by calling out the fact that they were calling for freedom of religion, yet were including what was assumed to be a Christian god into the constitution which would establish a national religion which was something both of us were supposed to be against. They replied with, "God is a universal idea and the same in all religions." We were still calling them out on the whole separation of church and state thing. Then Mr. autisticpants pointed out that separation of church and state only took off in the twentieth century and that it wasn't really enforced during the drafting of the constitution. Somehow, the anti's scored a point. Then they fucked up again by saying, "if you're so against religion being a part of the government, then why is, "in God we trust," on our money?" I immediately said, "that was in the fifties. Eisenhower did that." What did the girl on the other side say? "THAT'S NOT THE POINT. IF YOU BELIEVE SO MUCH IN FEDERALISM, WHY IS IT ON THE MONEY?" The professor explained it, thoroughly. She still retorted with, "THAT'S NOT THE POINT IF IT WAS IN THE FIFTIES." Like, holy shit, she would not stop. Finally, I spoke out and would have probably earned us a point if the argument wasn't cut short. I said, "the whole point of this revolt against the English and creation of this government was to escape the tyranny of the king. Federalism guarantees that the states and federal government are equal and in balance, meaning no other government can take complete power of the union. Federalism is Tyranny-proof." Then things were back on track. Appropriate questions were asked, appropriate answers were given. Class was dismissed.

The next class argument is scheduled to be North V. South in the Civil War. Lotta fun that's gonna be...

Hunter, you make me feel like a shit debater.
 
Pikonic said:
The Hunter said:
The next class argument is scheduled to be North V. South in the Civil War. Lotta fun that's gonna be...
I have often wondered how the South teaches the civil war.
Around here, very pro-north. Around the rest of the south, I wouldn't know. They don't want us in the south, but we're still a part of it.
 
The Hunter said:
Pikonic said:
The Hunter said:
The next class argument is scheduled to be North V. South in the Civil War. Lotta fun that's gonna be...
I have often wondered how the South teaches the civil war.
Around here, very pro-north. Around the rest of the south, I wouldn't know. They don't want us in the south, but we're still a part of it.
It's wired that the 'South' is the southeast, New Mexico and Arizona are the 'southwest' and Texas is just Texas.
 
One thing that makes me cry for humanity is that there isn't a cartoon adaptation of Calvin and Hobbes.
 
Kamen Rider Black said:
One thing that makes me cry for humanity is that there isn't a cartoon adaptation of Calvin and Hobbes.

Makes me want to crash into slumber.
 
I really want to take Anthropology in the winter. Tracking conditions are great in winter.
 
Niachu said:
I really want to take Anthropology in the winter. Tracking conditions are great in winter.
Everything's better in winter. Especially anything that involves you going outside. It's always been my favorite time to go downtown or hike.

I've been waking up unreasonably early lately, probably because of my bed. I think I need a new one.
 
Back