The Gun Control Debate Thread - Controlling autism since 2022

Australia took everyone's guns away but then we just had a barbecue and played beach cricket.
"Gun control has been a contentious issue in Australia, with gun-control advocates pushing for stricter laws and gun owners opposing them; statistics show that gun control has done nothing to decrease crime in that country."


"there is little evidence to suggest that it had any significant effects on firearm homicides and suicides. In addition, there does not appear to be any substitution effects, specifically that reduced access to firearms may have let those bent on committing homicide or suicide to use alternative methods. Although gun buybacks appear to be a logical and sensible policy that helps to placate the public's fears, the evidence so far suggests that in the Australian context, the high expenditure incurred to fund the 1996 gun buyback has not translated into any tangible reductions in terms of firearms deaths."

 
  • Informative
Reactions: BULLY HUNTER_77
"Gun control has been a contentious issue in Australia, with gun-control advocates pushing for stricter laws and gun owners opposing them; statistics show that gun control has done nothing to decrease crime in that country."


"there is little evidence to suggest that it had any significant effects on firearm homicides and suicides. In addition, there does not appear to be any substitution effects, specifically that reduced access to firearms may have let those bent on committing homicide or suicide to use alternative methods. Although gun buybacks appear to be a logical and sensible policy that helps to placate the public's fears, the evidence so far suggests that in the Australian context, the high expenditure incurred to fund the 1996 gun buyback has not translated into any tangible reductions in terms of firearms deaths."

lol, are you so insecure about daddy taking your penis-compensating manchildren boomsticks that you keep an archive of pro-gun articles and quotes? Insanity, I tell you.
 
The role of government is not to prevent crime, it is to punish criminals.

Everything the government has done to try and prevent crime has been shit.

The TSA? Ounce limitations on tubes when traveling? Taking your shoes off at the airport? That is attempting to prevent crime.

The PATRIOT Act? The NSA collecting all your Metadata and storing it? Banks being required to know all your personal information to try and catch money launderers and terrorists? That is attempting to prevent crime.

When crime happens, you punish the criminal and move on. And if a kid is dead, well, at least he didn't live long enough to get drafted into WWIII
 
Gun control is the infantilization of functioning adults into children who are not allowed to own or do dangerous things because the Karens that tend to infest government bureaucracies like the plague have decided that said things are too "dangerous" by whatever arbitrary standard they adhere to.

Put into Kiwi-Friendly terms: gun control is fake, gay, fat, ugly and I would not have sex with it.
 
Last edited:
guys cars kill people we should ban cars and all personal transport
They ruin the enviroment as well.
Actually there are far left elements trying to do that or at least pushing forth the idea. But yes it is a retarded argument.
They never had a constitutional right to own slaves. There simply weren't state-level laws (in some states) forbidding slavery. That is, of course, in no way related to the topic at hand, but you are a retard, so that's expected.
Yes it is related. He wants everyone to *be* slaves. Of the state, that is.

Only the government should have guns or cars. One to force you into the car, the other to auto-drive you to the happy fun time camp.
Gun control is the infantilization of functioning adults into children who are not allowed to own or do dangerous things because the Karens that tend to infest government bureaucracies like the plague have decided that said things are too "dangerous" by whatever arbitrary standard they adhere to.

Put into Kiwi-Friendly terms: Gun Control is fake, gay, fat, ugly and I would not have sex with it.
I just like how the grabbers get upset over all of it :smug:
 
Yes it is related. He wants everyone to *be* slaves. Of the state, that is.

Only the government should have guns or cars. One to force you into the car, the other to auto-drive you to the happy fun time camp.
I wonder how much he is seething over the new SCOTUS gun decision
 
He probably sounds like an animal dying in pain when he types up a storm 😂
Anti-gunners are actually pretty cool people. I just don't want civilians to own dangerous assault rifles to LARP as militamen. Oh, and Paul Harrel is a fucking psycho, his latest videos of mass shootings was basically an apology for gun ownership and the "solution" was to arm EVERY mass gathering of people. He want America to be turned into Israel just so that you can have your COD toys.
 
I just don't want civilians to own dangerous assault rifles to LARP as militamen
"Assault rifles" make up only 0.001575% of all US guns. Like always, you are attacking the wrong target. Let me guess, like the last time, you'll get upset that I have data to back my claims up
 
Anti-gunners are actually pretty cool people
This might be the most epic self-own I've seen all week.
"Assault rifles" make up only 0.001575% of all US guns. Like always, you are attacking the wrong target. Let me guess, like the last time, you'll get upset that I have data to back my claims up
He probably buys into the stereotypes while he masturbates to the idea of a carless, pod living, bug eating, perpetually drugged drowsy society of drooling NPC communist bugmen.
 
This might be the most epic self-own I've seen all week.

He probably buys into the stereotypes while he masturbates to the idea of a carless, pod living, bug eating, perpetually drugged drowsy society of drooling NPC communist bugmen.
Honestly, based on some of his statements in this thread I'm reasonably sure he's a troll trying to farm negrates by slinging around tired talking points. I mean; seriously now, who the fuck gives a shit about "militiamen" one way or another in the year 2022? The sort of absolutely deranged liberal who seriously cares about that issue wouldn't be caught dead on here simply because we spend lots of time mocking various mainstream liberal sacred cows.
 
Honestly, based on some of his statements in this thread I'm reasonably sure he's a troll trying to farm negrates by slinging around tired talking points. I mean; seriously now, who the fuck gives a shit about "militiamen" one way or another in the year 2022? The sort of absolutely deranged liberal who seriously cares about that issue wouldn't be caught dead on here simply because we spend lots of time mocking various mainstream liberal sacred cows.
I've noticed that about his posting history, either he's a gimmick poster as in trying to piss people off as much as possible, or he's a normie invader who's under the delusion that he can win a few converts by throwing old and tired talking points around.

If I shared a playlist of the kind of music I listen to, he'd probably go all fundie Jesus freak and try to milk negrates from me by telling me I'm going to Hell.
 
If I shared a playlist of the kind of music I listen to, he'd probably go all fundie Jesus freak and try to milk negrates from me by telling me I'm going to Hell.
DM me your playlist, plz
 
DM me your playlist, plz
I'll get it started, personally I've been listening to a lot of Venom recently.
"Assault rifles" make up only 0.001575% of all US guns. Like always, you are attacking the wrong target. Let me guess, like the last time, you'll get upset that I have data to back my claims up
Using data to back your claims up goes against the way of the woke cult. Do that enough, and you will be branded a racist and your soul will be damned to Hell for all eternity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
"Everyone who says that not selling rifles that have already caused horrible massacres by their lethality, availability and ease of use is a troll or gimick poster so as not to address his points. Because he's right."
You haven't managed to back up even a single one of your claims with proof, and I have managed to debunk all of them still.

Again, most murders and massacres are done by handguns. Rifles accounted for only 3% of all firearm murders in 2020. The stats for that are in the thread.

And besides, US has tried the ban you are suggesting in 1994. All studies found it had no effect. See, for example, this study, that found that not only did it have no effect, but that gun control causes in fact more gun deaths.

Or you can read this.
 
You haven't managed to back up even a single one of your claims with proof, and I have managed to debunk all of them still.

Again, most murders and massacres are done by handguns. Rifles accounted for only 3% of all firearm murders in 2020. The stats for that are in the thread.

And besides, US has tried the ban you are suggesting in 1994. All studies found it had no effect. See, for example, this study, that found that not only did it have no effect, but that gun control causes in fact more gun deaths.

Or you can read this.
But handguns don't look scary like the rifles Arnold Schwarzenegger would use in a movie

Your argument is invalid
 
Back