- Joined
- Mar 26, 2016
What is the value of a man, then?It's the year 2020, people still do not understand the value of human life.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is the value of a man, then?It's the year 2020, people still do not understand the value of human life.
The Holocaust is brought up so much because it is the only genocide that the western world has a large amount of accessible information about. We know that the Soviets and the Chinese killed more people than the Nazis ever did, but how much evidence do we have of those? The people who survived did not speak out, and of those who did, there is less testimony that westerners have access to.
Of course I was referring that. I mean I'm in the Netherlands. We call the last winter of the second world war "hunger winter". After the war, we sent thousands of kids to a brief stay in england, sweden and denmark so that they could be fed properly for a while.I don't think he was referring to that. Read his comment, it's all based on hypotheticals
Zyklon B wasn't raw hydrogen cyanide. It was a "safe" form of hydrogen cyanide with stabilizers added to avoid explosions.
And the lethal dose levels are orders of magnitude lower than the explosive levels.
I saw a museum exhibit as a kid - it was full of toothbrushes, dentures, prosthetic legs and (IIRC) shorn hair. You can find pictures of it online, but if you're a denier you're gonna say all that shit can be faked anyway.Lol one thing that blows my mind about that shit is that one witness said "human hair was used for mattresses," and no one ever thought to ask "well, where are these mattresses now?"
There's a lot more to it than just having accesible information. Just last year, in 2019, 74 years afterthe fact, the national dutch railways was coerced to pay millions for their role in transporting Trump's Chosen People during the second world war. Mind you, they did this when the Netherlands was occupied by a foreign force.
As a redneck african american said on the montell williams show "the holocaust is big business".
THE Holocaust has always been marked by numbers. There was the numbering of arms in death camps and the staggering death toll where the words six million became both a body count and a synonym for an unspeakable crime. After the Holocaust, Germany performed the necessary long division in paying token reparations to survivors. More recently, Swiss banks and European insurance companies have concealed bank account and policy numbers belonging to dead Jews.
Only with the Holocaust have dehumanization and death been as much a moral mystery as a tragic game of arithmetic. And the numbers continue, although now largely in reverse.
After 60 years, Holocaust survivors are inching toward extinction. According to Ira Sheskin, director of the Jewish Demography Project at the University of Miami, fewer than 900,000 remain, residing primarily in the United States, Israel and the former Soviet Union. Most are in their 80s and 90s. Unless immediate measures are taken, many of those who survived the Nazi evil will soon die without a proper measure of dignity.
According to Dr. Sheskin’s data, more than 87,000 American Holocaust survivors — roughly half the American total — qualify as poor, meaning they have annual incomes below $15,000. The United Jewish Communities, the umbrella organization of the American Jewish Federations, determined that 25 percent of the American survivors live at or below the official federal poverty line. (The poverty figure in New York City is even higher.) Many are without sufficient food, shelter, heat, health care, medicine, dentures, eyeglasses, even hearing aids.
i literally cringed when i read this one dude ngl
Just because I sort of underemphasized it in the OP, here's a very comprehensive blog by one SirAaronRichards:
The entry greatly details and cites sources affirming that the Holocaust, indeed, happened and could very well have been orchestrated from the top down. Other entries featured there are entirely peripheral to the Holocaust (Khazar theory, Marx's ancestry, et cetera), but the substance concerns the Holocaust.
Would like to here what the deniers have to say about it.
Indeed, his POV is fucking obnoxious, but he presents extensively detailed information. As far as I know, none of his citations are factually inaccurate with regards to the Holocaust. Of course, he doesn't help his case when he mocks the Holodomor as Ukrainian propaganda:I like his cataloging of the the landscape, but I do find it hard to take him serious when he describes rationalwiki as a "nice website".
Commies gonna commie.Of course, he doesn't help his case when he mocks the Holodomor as Ukrainian propaganda:
The guy calls himself a centrist and has previously condemned Communism. From his own userpage:Commies gonna commie.
SirAaronRichards said:I am Aaron Richards, hobby history buff, science student, political centrist, atheist, European, youtuber and /pol/ack. A combination of being called a Jew due to my username and encountering theories on said browsing mediums combined with my own love for history led me to the rabbit hole of holocaust research. Refuting 40 years of antisemitism can be a laborious, but rewarding and fun task, as you will find out in my Holocaust Documents album. Historians might be far more accurate than I am in my blog, but they need to step up their game and offer interactive debunking websites or it'll be up to poor sods like me to offer illustrated rebuttals to internet conspiracy theories for the general public.
Personally, I think it happened, but I certainly don't think the numbers were anywhere near six million, and many of the stories about it are doubtlessly fabrications from people who likely weren't even there, and just wanted attention. As for the Nuremberg trials, that was doubtlessly a kangaroo court. Some of the defendants should have been found guilty, but there were some that certainly had a reasonable doubt to their guilt, and this was despite the fact that none of the accused received what could be called a "vigorous defense." Hearsay testimony was admitted, there was little to no cross-examination, and evidence was admitted without it being first disclosed to the defense. You could convict pretty much anyone of anything with trials conducted like that.Radical opinion: it happened and I don't care. It was neither the first, nor the last, nor the worst of the genocides of its era. No one alive is guilty of it, and no outstanding debts are owed this side of the veil. It's well past time we quit allowing ourselves to get melodramatic about it.
Put me in the "Deniers" category. I've lurked 8ch /pol/ for so long to where some posts have made some compelling arguments against the Holocaust... so much so I decided to take the advice of a couple "beginner's red pill" guide and buy "Adolf Hitler, The Greatest Story Never Told".
If that makes me Autistic or a Nazi, then so be it.