‘Traditional TV is dying’: can networks pivot and survive?

1723238384214.png

Warner Bros Discovery’s announcement this week of a $9bn (£7bn) writedown in the value of its TV networks is a stark acknowledgment of the damage the streaming wars are inflicting on traditional broadcasting models.

The astonishing figure, which pushed the US entertainment group to a quarterly net loss of $10bn (£7.9bn) and sent shares sliding 12% in early trading on Thursday, lays bare how channels such as CNN, TLC and the Food Network can no longer rely on a captive cable subscriber base.

The rapid consumer shift away from high-priced TV packages, coupled with the inexorable decline in advertising, has forced traditional TV companies to invest billions in low-cost streaming services to catch up with first movers such as Netflix.

The question is now whether companies such as WBD – home to TV and film content including Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga, Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire, The Big Bang Theory, Succession, Friends and all Olympics events – can build the scale and make significant profits from their streaming operations before the death of linear television delivered by cable, satellite or aerial.

“Traditional TV is dying, or at least in zombie mode,” says Alex Degroote, a media analyst. “It is being replaced by a combination of services such as short-form video players like YouTube and TikTok, and the top streamers such as Netflix. WBD’s $9bn impairment is a real hammer blow and will reverberate across all traditional media assets.”

The market value of WBD, home to assets including the Warner Bros film studio, HBO and CNN, has plunged almost 70% in the two years since the group was formed in a $40bn (£31.5bn) merger between WarnerMedia and Discovery intended to help both businesses survive the transition to a streaming future.

“Unfortunately, the stock performance is a clear indication that investors see little optimism that the tides may soon start to turn,” says Robert Fishman, senior analyst at MoffettNathanson.

Earlier this week, Disney disclosed that its streaming operations – which include the global Disney+ service, Hulu and ESPN+ in the US and Hotstar in India – achieved profitability for the first time in the quarter to the end of June.

However, the milestone of $447m (£352m) in operating profit, which was above management projections, has come at a huge cost, with its streaming services running up $11bn (£9.2bn) in losses since Disney+ was launched in 2019.

Disney has more than 200 million global streaming subscribers, and WBD exceeds 100 million globally, with Discovery+ now the fastest-growing service in the UK thanks to winning the rights to show every Olympic discipline. But the battle is not just to continue to drive scale.

Boosting revenue and profits per subscriber has become critical through strategies including rapid rounds of price increases – Disney has just announced a set of price rises for later this year – as well as driving slightly cheaper ad-funded tiers to pull in cost-conscious consumers.

While traditional TV companies struggle with managing the decline in their legacy businesses, with drastic rounds of cost-cutting after a decade of profligate spending on content in the first decade of the streaming wars, Netflix points to a viable future.

The streaming giant, which once struggled with mounting losses running into tens of billions of dollars, has seen its market value surge by more than 50% over the past year after turning the profitability corner while continuing to see significant growth in subscribers.

WBD’s chief executive, David Zaslav, who has considered breaking up the company but concluded that is not currently the best option, said the market was being hit by a “generational disruption” that requires traditional TV companies to take “bold, necessary steps”.

Richard Broughton, director at Ampere Analysis, said: “Legacy TV businesses are in decline but the shift is not so rapid that it can’t be managed. There are still a lot of broadcast TV viewers, they have the time to pivot to profitability in the streaming world.”

The Guardian
Archive [August 9 2024]
 
The Beeb is fucked.

They had a nasty habit of burning their back catalogue for decades so their content library isn't as big as you'd think.

These days they also almost exclusively hire leftist fuckheads like that prick Gary Linkler (or similar) so the stuff they make now is almost unwatchable shit.

Disagree. They've got lots of shows that are as good or better than any from the big streaming services - Shetland, Line of Duty, Happy Valley, The Split, Kin, Guilt, The Responder.
 
It's getting to the point where the BBC will force consumers who only watch stream services to pay their license fee to survive:

Netflix And Disney+ Users May Need A TV Licence Soon

If you thought you could avoid the TV Licence fee by sticking to streaming services like Netflix and Disney+, you might want to think again. The UK government is reportedly exploring plans that could force streaming-only households to pay the BBC licence fee – marking a dramatic shift in how British TV is funded...

This would be a massive shift from the current system, potentially affecting millions of households who’ve cut traditional TV cords in favour of streaming-only entertainment.

For a family that currently pays for Netflix with adverts (£4.99/month) and Disney+ (£4.99/month), this would mean an additional £174.50 annual charge (£14.5/month) – regardless of their viewing habits or whether they use any BBC services.
 
One thing I liked about TV over streaming is that it kept everyone more connected on the same thing. If something good was on Saturday at 8pm, everyone would be watching it at the same time and have something to talk about on Monday. With streaming everyone just watches different things at different paces; when they drop a whole season at a time you can't really discuss each episode individually like you used to.
I used to miss that too but I've come to the realization that that feeling of connection is actually what makes mass media so insidious. It creates artificial culture and manufactured concent. All those people around the water cooler are subject to the same conditioning by the same people. This is how you make retarded ideas like "equity" into unchallengeable truths that are just swallowed whole by 90% of the population.
 
In the fall, Fox has, a mystery drama about some murders in a small town, a Baywatch knockoff, another procedural cop show, another procedural cop-like show, reality TV shows, then a couple cartoons on Sunday.


View attachment 6293699

TV is dying because there is fuck all to watch and the celebrity driven shit like Masked Singer. I tried looking up some 'celebrities' on there and it's people like Janel Parrish, Macy Gray, John Oates, and so on. I have no idea who these people are as you'd either have to be a geriatric or zoomer obsessed with pop music or teen shows to know them.


They could probably get better ratings just showing reruns of Dragonball Z. The networks seem entirely disinterested in trying anything the least bit different and the general audiences aren't much better. Most people want to watch the same old shit over and over with slightly different variations which ends up boring a ton of people.
Dragon Ball Z Kai ratings have largely plateaued at this point and the last couple of times Adult Swim tried rerunning the show, they yanked it midway through the Freeza Saga.

Sailor Moon only recently returned to TV and it got double dropped episode airing after two months due to bad ratings to burn through the first season then dumped onto Saturday Toonami at the very end of the night.
 
I haven't watched TV in a decade now. If I want to watch something I either use a DVD or Blu Ray from my collection or I watch something on YouTube. Very rarely I will find something to watch for free on Roku. I can even pull out one of my SSD's and use my laptop to watch movies. I don't pay for a single streaming service.

Video games and YouTube videos make up the bulk of my entertainment.
 
That got me thinking, a 'good run' on old TV was something like 5-8 seasons, like a TNG or something. Is it just me or do almost all streaming series get canceled after 1 or 2? I know there are exceptions but I don't remember there being anywhere near this much shovelware that just drops off the map then. I mean even Rings of Power is having a tough time. For every House of Cards style show there seems like dozens of 1-2 ones.

I might be biased cause I don't care much about new TV series and only really notice how Disney+ can't seem to get anything to last more than 1 or 2 seasons at best.
In the past, the end goal of all TV shows was 100 episodes, the generally accepted bare minimum for syndication. In the era of 22-24 episodes per season, you reached this by season five, which is important as most shows put their actors on a five season contract and after season five, the actors either bail or have to be signed to new contracts with a big pay raise and a cut of residuals from said reruns if their original deal did not gave them.

Most of these new contracts run 1-2 years top, because at this point if a show is a huge enough hit to justify keeping it going, each new season past season five is a calculation of production cost and actors salary cost divided by how much money can be spent before production becomes unprofitable and the actors saying "fuck this shit" and refusing to come back for one more season.

Streaming sites operate on the "less is more" pay cable model of 6-13 episodes per season and syndication is a non factor. What counts is views/episodes watched from start to finish/seasons finished in the window a show drops, plus budget.

Adding to this, because streaming shows (again, emulating pay cable) shoot everything at once then air or worse shoot everything at once and split the results into two seasons, you don't have the luxury to retool a failing show mid season. Case in point, Melrose Place: which after the first thirteen episodes, underwent an emergency retool going from a slice of life show about twenty somethings to a note traditional soap opera with several new cast members and a main character turning evil as the show's chief villain.
 
the term pivot is so funny. It is a totally unnecessary extra word that i guess is supposed to make the subject seem somewhat dynamic and in control? Every time I see it used it is either totally superfluous to the sentence or could be more appropriately replaced with "change" or "figure out".
 
  • Like
Reactions: LilShotaBoy
you poor poor children

I'm old enuff to remember a show called Dallas. And when one of the main characters got shot in a cliffhanger season finale the whole western world ground to a halt.

Who Shot JR was one of the biggest events of the 80's. Back when TV was a mainstay of life and prime time was a real money maker for the networks. Shit Time magazine did a cover for it and this was back when Time was an actual respected news outlet and not the joke it became after 2016

Now everything seems so bland, corporate and frankly boring. Now that my family is all grown I haven't turn on my TV in almost a decade. Which is a bit of a shame cuz it's a really nice plasma tv that looks good but it's useless if there is nothing worth watching on tv or streaming.
For my generation it was "Who Shot Mr.Burns?". It even included a contest no one won because no one could guess the actual shooter so they chose a schmuck at random to win
 
Who Shot JR was such a big deal because JR was the first true anti-hero/villain protagonist on prime time TV and Larry Hangman gave a career redefining performance as the villainous JR that was the prototype for actors like Michael Chiklis, Bryan Cranston, Ted Danson, etc.

A shame though Dallas is lost media at this point. The DVDs are oop, it's not been on TV since The Nashville Network rebranded, and IIRC you can't even stream it.
 
I get glimpses at modern cable when I go visit my boomer dad. There's 1500 channels that are the same 300 or so channels repeated multiple times for no discernable reason. You got the news channel block, the "discovery" and other reality tv block, the largest of the blocks is the "just ads" block,some kids content, the 24/7 law and order channels and then the 12 movie channels. Dad pays an unfathomable amount for it and he just watches the commie news network and ancient aliens.
 
Back