US Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them

Link (Archive)

Twice as many Americans would avoid brands with Pride merch than would support them​

A new poll released just before Pride Month shows that more Americans would avoid a company that offers Pride merchandise than would be motivated to support the same company.

The poll, commissioned by the LGBTQ+ organization GLAAD and conducted by the polling firm IPSOS, asked American adults what impact it would have on their likelihood of buying from a brand or store if they knew that that brand or store offered “LGBTQ Pride collections/merchandise.”

Fifteen percent of respondents said they would be more likely to buy from that brand or store, while nearly twice as many (27%) said they would be less likely to buy from that brand or store. A majority (55%) said that it wouldn’t impact their decision to purchase from the store.

Black non-Hispanic respondents responded less positively to the question about Pride merchandise, with only 8% saying they’d be more likely to buy from a store or brand with Pride merch and 11% saying they would be less likely to buy from them. An overwhelming majority (77%) of Black non-Hispanic respondents said it didn’t matter.

Hispanic people were more likely (19%) to say that Pride merchandise would positively impact their likelihood of buying from a brand.

The publicly released poll results don’t show breakout results for other races or ethnicities, so it’s unclear how white non-Hispanic, Asian-American/Pacific Islander (AAPI), Native American, or people of other races responded.

The poll also asked if it “would be a shame” if a store or brand stopped supporting Pride Month. More people disagreed (48%) with that statement than agreed (46%).

People were about evenly split on whether they were comfortable or uncomfortable with companies changing their logos for Pride Month (48% vs. 47%) and brands having marketing campaigns for Pride Month at all (48% vs. 47%). They were more comfortable with the idea of companies supporting LGBTQ+ organizations (52% vs. 43%) and sponsoring Pride events (52% vs. 44%).

The question of the public’s support for corporate Pride has been relevant in recent years as conservatives have mounted boycott campaigns of businesses that sell Pride gear. In 2023, it was a trend on social media for rightwing influencers to film themselves at Target looking angry or disgusted with the chain’s Pride offerings, eventually leading Target to withdraw its Pride displays in many stores. Target later rolled back its commitment to diversity. Several Republican state attorneys general threatened legal action against Target for selling Pride merchandise.

Years of backlash against companies that support Pride have led to fewer sponsors for Pride events this year. New York City’s Pride organizers have already said that they are $750,000 short in funds because corporate sponsors are pulling out, which could also be explained by corporations trying to stay in the good graces of the new presidential administration.

In a press release, GLAAD was more upbeat about the survey results. For example, for the question about Pride merchandise, they noted that 70% of Americans in their survey said that a brand offering Pride merchandise would have either a positive impact or no impact at all on their purchasing decisions, a statement that’s true even if most of those people are in the “no impact” category.

The release also highlighted that 81% of respondents agreed that “freedom means we all should be able to believe and behave as we choose, as long as it isn’t hurting anyone else.” Of course, the disagreement between pro- and anti-LGBTQ+ advocates is about what counts as freedom and what counts as hurting others.

GLAAD also noted that 85% of respondents agreed that “CEOs have a responsibility to speak up about things that matter to their consumers and shareholders,” even though the question, as worded, would include both support and opposition to equal rights as “things that matter to consumers.”

GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis said that, despite the poll’s results, support for LGBTQ+ people “remains a business imperative” for companies. “Companies and leaders must listen to consumers who are demanding that brands prioritize values of freedom, inclusion, and growth over rank politics.”

The poll was conducted from April 11 to 14, 2025, and was based on 1025 interviews.
 
The biggest surprise is that 19% of Hispanics reacted positively. Excluding Uruguay, Hispanics normally adhere to Christianity and family itself to a degree that put Evangelicals to shame. I wonder if illegals were part of those interviewed.

From another point, even BGLT+ people hate corporate pride, though the reasons they give come off hypocritical or nonsensical.

I wonder why Africans are the most disdainful. Did the Black Lives Matter movement made them feel tha they must be The Most Important People?
 
We really need to take it back. Rainbows are beautiful and natural. Biblically they are the sign of God's promise. I could swear I heard that even rainbow flags used to be a christian thing, but now I can't find ANY info trying to google that (on Bing); all it brings up is shit like those fags that dress like nuns.

I get this, it's just so sad. Maybe just educate them early. Imagine your kid responding: "Yeah, it's the symbol of God's promise not to drown the whole earth just to get rid of fags like you."
This is true. Protestant peasant rebels in Germany from the Peasants' War of 1524-25 (who wanted Martin Luther himself to support them and thought he'd be their great champion against the feudal order, only for him to write a pamphlet severely denouncing them that was literally titled Against the Murderous, Thieving Hordes of Peasants and called for their extermination as though they were rabid pitbulls, but I digress), for example, marched and fought under a rainbow flag.

peasants-revolt-flag.webp

The slogan underneath directly references the Christian understanding of the rainbow, translating to 'The word of the LORD stays eternally' (Latin) and 'It is the sign of the eternal covenant of God' (German). Also, the Armenians considered adopting a rainbow flag after surviving genocide & seemingly being on the verge of gaining independence at the end of WW1, but they ended up going with the more familiar red-blue-orange tricolor instead.

Saryan---Flag-Rainbow.webp

The modern fag flag specifically has only six colors, which I've seen more conspiracy-minded autists argue translates to the marring of God's perfect creation (to numerologists, the number seven means divine perfection & completeness, while the number six is held to be its opposite and means incompleteness, sin and rebellion against God's sovereignty; Christ is also associated with 7, and the Devil with 6 even before you make it into 666). Honestly I've come to find these arguments more persuasive after wading into the realm of elite symbology around 2016 but to keep the autistic sperging about numbers & occultism to a minimum, as far as retaking the rainbow goes, a version with all seven colors seems like it would be a good start for an actually Christian/pro-family/superstraight (since the black-orange design got ruined by a media barrage back before faggot fatigue had set in fully)/what-have-you challenger to the six-color standard of faggotry.
 
But that's the catch, it's the fact he didn't want to be active in the community that made him so respected. Really what we need is for there not to be a gay community, outside of the actual cruising for sex scene.
This is true.

At one point in the documentary, Reubens made a point of saying how Pee-Wee's Playhouse was so diverse "without having to beat the audience over the head about it."

He definitely came across as someone completely disinterested in labels and "identities."
 
The modern fag flag specifically has only six colors, which I've seen more conspiracy-minded autists argue translates to the marring of God's perfect creation
It's literally because the dude who designed it didn't have enough money to have a 7 colour flag printed. The rainbow shit is a reference to being a "friend of Dorothy," btw.
 
How the fuck does it cost more than 3/4s of a million dollars to block off some streets and let some fags march down holding signs? Or were corporate sponsors paying for the rolling fuck truck Sodom and Gonorrhea floats and underage child drag queen twerking competitions for adult men?

Maybe the reason people don't want to buy pride themed shit is because they're feeling LGBTfatigue to go along with their nigger fatigue and beaner fatigue?
They have to pay the City for Police and Sanitation. On Overtime rates.
 
Maybe if the LBGT community didn't try to take 1st place away from real woman and girls in sports or try to put this crap into schools and give kids hormones and surgeries people wouldn't care as much. But they crossed the line there; and by bot backing away a few steps and admitting that was wrong they double down and call everyone who disagrees a bigot. If they want to have a parade where they wave flags I'm fine with that. What I'm NOT fine with his some dude in panties and high heels waving his dick and ass in some kids face and everyone applauds him.

Also, those millions of dollars used to pay the police and the city could easily go to better causes like finding murderers or kidnappers.
 
Last edited:
I haven't bought a Gillette razor since that ad they ran
Pride and troon stuff made me dump Gillette, Bud Light (for guests since I hate it anyway), Target and Ben and Jerry's ice cream. I'm not generally a boycott fag, but those companies pushed me way too far.

I dumped Starbucks long before that because of the hostile lefty baristas who give you the stink eye while wearing every dumbass political pin they can think of. It was also the first place I saw obvious AGP troons in fetish wear like fishnet stockings, while on the job. WTF.
The biggest surprise is that 19% of Hispanics reacted positively
I suspect many were confused by the question and the real number is close to the black number.
 
It's literally because the dude who designed it didn't have enough money to have a 7 colour flag printed. The rainbow shit is a reference to being a "friend of Dorothy," btw.
I never knew that. So what I'm hearing is that a rainbow flag with seven colours is like a Christian symbol, maybe even Islamic as well. Just not-LGBTQ.

If a bunch of online trolls can convince idiots that this is a symbol of White Nationalism
1748193198514.webp

then maybe they can reclaim the rainbow. I can see the ADL sponsored headline now: "Count the colours in your rainbow. Why your flag might not be saying what you think."
 
How the fuck does it cost more than 3/4s of a million dollars to block off some streets and let some fags march down holding signs? Or were corporate sponsors paying for the rolling fuck truck Sodom and Gonorrhea floats and underage child drag queen twerking competitions for adult men?
I haven't gone to one of these things in over a decade, but the one I went to was massive. Multiple streets blocked off, booths, infrastructure like food trucks and portable toilets, even several radio stations had huge ass rigs and speakers out playing music with the actual on-air DJs there doing a live show. It was a huge party that took up several blocks, not just a parade. One of the drag queens from RuPaul's Drag Race was even in the parade which was seen as a big deal. It was at a major city but I'm sure it's nothing compared to New York's, they probably have to block off even more.

Is there a name for it when there's a social cause that at first seems "valid" because the loudest voices are mistaken for popular sentiment, but after some time and fatigue of said cause, people openly admit they didn't care for the cause in the first place? Because there should be when the whiny twunts that made a big deal about Pride merch get their noses rubbed in it like this that we can remind them that they, too, are just a passing fad and they can shove their moral superiority up their spoiled asses.
Havel's Greengrocer.
Havel uses the example of a greengrocer who displays in his shop the sign Workers of the world, unite! Since failure to display the sign could be seen as disloyalty, he displays it and the sign becomes not a symbol of his enthusiasm for the regime, but a symbol of both his submission to it and humiliation by it. Havel returns repeatedly to this motif to show the contradictions between the "intentions of life" and the "intentions of systems", i.e. between the individual and the state, in a totalitarian society.

An individual living within such a system must live a lie, to hide that which he truly believes and desires, and to do that which he must do, to be left in peace and to survive. This is comparable to the classical tale of "The Emperor's New Clothes."

"[T]hey must live within a lie. They need not accept the lie. It is enough for them to have accepted their life with it and in it. For by this very fact, individuals confirm the system, fulfill the system, make the system, are the system."

I wonder why Africans are the most disdainful. Did the Black Lives Matter movement made them feel tha they must be The Most Important People?
Blacks have always been allowed to be as misogynistic and homophobic as they want with little social repercussions. Look at the hip-hop industry. Look at how much Kanye has been able to get away with. Look at how Chris Brown and Jonathan Majors were able to walk away from domestic abuse like it was nothing. (Majors had a glowing article written about him in Variety to rehabilitate his image and he's already set to star in another film.)

Niggers are still pretty gay though.
 
I wonder why Africans are the most disdainful. Did the Black Lives Matter movement made them feel tha they must be The Most Important People?
As @blackface enthusiast mentioned, blacks can generally be (and they are) as homophobic as they want to be. Their culture is specifically fairly homophobic.

Though I didn't read the data that way. I saw them as really not giving much of a fuck either way.
 
A lot of elder gays are fed up with this shit. Scott Thompson has also ditched the rainbow.
The elder gays I know feel like they need to go back into the closet because of all the degeneracy associated with the current LGBTetc community. It's a shame because these are the ones who wanted to prove they were no different than anyone else apart from their bedroom habits and could still be good friends, relatives, coworkers, etc. despite that and speak out against the degeneracy if it wouldn't see them canceled from the same communities they staunchly fought for or otherwise supported back in the day.

Most people don't care about who grown adults sleep with behind closed doors these days ... Just don't flaunt it like it's your personality, don't teach kids about how you do it in the bedroom, and don't groom kids into being convinced that they were born in the wrong bodies, for fuck's sake. lol.
Before the push for social justice and identity politics took off, it was understood that regardless of orientation, identity, etc. one kept their bedroom and personal habits discreet and didn't share those intimate details with the general public. As such, it was easier for people to accept LGB people who kept their personal lives and bedroom habits private while being respectable people in public like anyone else. Once T joined and became the most vocal part of the community, however, things went downhill fast and the community has turned into a big mess that most normal people don't want to touch with a mile-long pole because of how truly toxic it has become ☢️ ☣️.

We really need to take it back. Rainbows are beautiful and natural. Biblically they are the sign of God's promise. I could swear I heard that even rainbow flags used to be a christian thing, but now I can't find ANY info trying to google that (on Bing); all it brings up is shit like those fags that dress like nuns.
I've seen conservative people share memes on social media about "Reclaiming the rainbow." As nice as that sounds, it sounds like an optimistic uphill battle at best.

As for the OP, people have already mentioned the pride fatigue. The bigger picture is average consumers disliking a community that insists on buying not just the merchandise but every LGBTetc talking point or else one cannot claim to be accepting or an ally of the community. People can't be forced or bullied into submission or acceptance without it causing some sort of resentment below the surface. For more people, that resentment is starting to show as exhibited by these survey figures indicating people are more willing to avoid places promoting Pride Month with their merchandise and services.
 
Though I didn't read the data that way. I saw them as really not giving much of a fuck either way.
Which also reinforces that point, because black respondents can simply not care about pride or LGBTQIALMNOP stuff and it's fine, but a white respondent would be seen as actively hostile or oppressive for not engaging in the rainbow stuff and not putting the "workers of the world unite!" sign up.

The bigger picture is average consumers disliking a community that insists on buying not just the merchandise but every LGBTetc talking point or else one cannot claim to be accepting or an ally of the community. People can't be forced or bullied into submission or acceptance without it causing some sort of resentment below the surface. For more people, that resentment is starting to show as exhibited by these survey figures indicating people are more willing to avoid places promoting Pride Month with their merchandise and services.
This is a large problem as well, so much of these social movements were hijacked by people who are just bullies at best and rampant sociopaths at worse who just use this stuff to attack other people. You can only force people to comply with things like this for so long. And then one day, for no reason at all, they vote Austrian painters or orange reality TV stars into power.
 
no shit Sherlock

Faggot Pride has always been a heavily AstroTurf'ed thing. Without the constant and heavy handed media pressure no one wants faggots anywhere near them but thanks to social pressure they had to shut up or get cancelled.

Now the lid is off and in the US at least you can slowly see the tide turning, forcing these perverts, sexual predators and clout chaser back into the hell closet where they should be.
 
Back