Emperor_Norton said:
Let's say that you were in a hiring position at a minimum wage unskilled job (i.e. HR/Manager at Walmart), and you saw
Chris's resume on your desk. You do not know who Chris is, you have never met him, and you had never even heard of him, other than a short clip on the local news regarding his home burning down, so you decide to
google his name to find out more.
After learning about his

, his

, his

, and

, how do you react? Do you toss his resume into the recycle bin, or do you give him a chance with an interview? If you decide to interview him, how would it go, and would the interview make you more or less likely to hire him?
Keep in mind, this is not about his actual work ethic or performance on the job, nor his Social Security disability payments and the conflicts which could arise from him trying to get a job. The real question here is: Is Chris employable?
Nearly without exception, there are far more applicants for any job than there are jobs Even something like Walmart is bound to have superior options available, so on a fair basis, the HR manager throws Chris' resume on the stack of declined applications.
This kind of cop out answer doesn't really go into enough detail with the scenario--but there is something unusual about it from the very beginning.
The HR Person spends the time to understand who Chris is. Most HR people would throw the resume into the trash and move on to the high school junior, but here that's not the case.
All the same, HR representatives in companies can't really do something like tip off social services or suggest that a real problem is floating around--they have enough problems keeping their own teams solid. Frankly, if the google search was NOT the first thing that they did, they'd try calling the people on that Resume.
The most recent 'employer' is Michael Snyder's Game Place. And it's not like Snyder has any legal obligation to whitewash Chris' misdeeds. Weens and Julays to the contrary, if Snyder thinks he's dealing a serious inquiry he probably gives serious reasons NOT to hire CWC. Chris' stupidity in citing Snyder and the Game place rivals some of his more famous deeds.
The Direct Approach, of giving a Phone Interview, won't get anywhere either. Having been approached by the likes of Sherigu Miyamoto and Reggie Fils-Aime, there's no way a WM Manajerk is going to be taken that seriously. Chris won't take the call, and he won't even be very interesting on the phone. Possibly some Trolling fun can be had if Chris gets called out on some crap, but Chris hanging up is the end of the hiring process.
Or consider that a Background check hits a felony conviction. Chris probably does not mention that he hit Michael Snyder in a parking lot anywhere.
The score keeps coming back "Hard No" over and over again. Frankly, anyone who decides to hire Chris deserves to get fired themselves--can you argue any other way that they hired Chris for the good of the Company? That he was the best man for the job? Chris will lose his job, but Chris losing his job is entirely predictable. But how it happens--harassing a customer, a coworker, potentially something like indecent exposure or public nuisance--is entirely predictable. The HR person has deliberately chosen someone who has done bad things to others. They're not going to fix CWC, nor are they paid to try it--they need to have their tasks done optimally.
The Hiring Process is far from perfect. Complete losers gain access to jobs they will not perform well, and it's all too based on personality instead of deliverables. But Chris is a failure in either method--and he shouldn't make it to an interview.
Chris isn't truly unhirable but he is a true believer that he doesn't need to change to get a job. That is quite the problem.