Why are trannies hated by the rest of the LGBT community?

Could you stop talking in moonspeak and say "FtM" and "MtF" like the rest of us

In a way, many cows and transtrenders are better described as FtT and MtT since they either don't follow through on their transition or view being trans as the end goal in and of itself. They don't want to become a male or female, they want to be a tranny.
 
In a way, many cows and transtrenders are better described as FtT and MtT since they either don't follow through on their transition or view being trans as the end goal in and of itself. They don't want to become a male or female, they want to be a tranny.
That's a really good point.
 
In a way, many cows and transtrenders are better described as FtT and MtT since they either don't follow through on their transition or view being trans as the end goal in and of itself. They don't want to become a male or female, they want to be a tranny.

Fuck people who want to be a tranny.
 
In a way, many cows and transtrenders are better described as FtT and MtT since they either don't follow through on their transition or view being trans as the end goal in and of itself. They don't want to become a male or female, they want to be a tranny.
The most noticeable part of this is they call themselves trans when you'd think someone with gender dysphoria would rather not be constantly bringing that up.

But nope, can't be a special snowflake that way:
12646752_508070096041926_209460078274716015_o.jpg
 
The most noticeable part of this is they call themselves trans when you'd think someone with gender dysphoria would rather not be constantly bringing that up.

But nope, can't be a special snowflake that way:
12646752_508070096041926_209460078274716015_o.jpg

>wants to be invisible queer
>literally wears a shirt with flames all over it
 
In a way, many cows and transtrenders are better described as FtT and MtT since they either don't follow through on their transition or view being trans as the end goal in and of itself. They don't want to become a male or female, they want to be a tranny.
Also, a lot of them can't even embody the gender they're trying to copy...like it's not an innate characteristic within this person. It's almost like putting GI Joe in a skirt and sending him into the nearest lesbian hot spots.
 
Last edited:
Just my opinion, but the following two things.

Straight people "get" being gay, even the straightest man can look at a hot guy and think hey he's good looking. And same goes for women. Being gay is something that has been around since time immemorial. Long enough that it's addressed in ancient texts, the Bible etc.
It's harder for "normal" people to understand trans, drag queens, sure again men have been dressing in drag forever.


The second thing is gay people have had to go through alot to just be taken seriously, much less be accepted by the mainstream. Trannies make the whole group look bad because it makes them harder to take seriously.
 
Fun fact: Among the troons on the national geographic cover are at least 1 rapist and 1 pedophile.

Cherno Biko who confessed that he raped a ftm and Alok who said children are kinky and used other sexual terms to describe them.

For the uninformed, Cherno thought that the best way to be a woman would be to forcibly impregnate an FtT and then write a teary article about how he has to overcome sexual assault now. Sucks you were molested dude, maybe don't carry on the cycle of assault, dipshit.
 
For the uninformed, Cherno thought that the best way to be a woman would be to forcibly impregnate an FtT and then write a teary article about how he has to overcome sexual assault now. Sucks you were molested dude, maybe don't carry on the cycle of assault, dipshit.


Lets just pretend this issue of NatGeo had nothing but animals on the cover, which is true in so many different ways.
 
I have had to sever ties with a lot of trenders after figuring out their mindset, and damn do the handful of legitimate transsexuals I've talked to hate them. I've come to sympathise with the ones who stay silent because they really do believe trenders are giving them a bad name. They don't like the politics, the thinkpieces on gender identity... they know it's horseshit.

The transsexuals I've remained friends with I have nothing but respect for. I know it's hard to actually go through HRT all the way, and I will heavily recommend someone against doing it if they consider it because of the potential for regret, and medical science isn't at a point where you can switch biological sex overnight.

Mind you, the "community" aspect of LGBT is full of headassery and feigned acceptance. The established community loves the trender crowd, it's the outsiders who hate this tripe.

Also why is every trender a self-proclaimed communist?
 
Strangely enough, that isn't always the case. I can't speak of specifics for obvious reasons, but fetishists who co-operate with therapy can learn emotional regulation (It's possible to teach that now!) and create a quality life where "I'm a hot little fucktoy" isn't their biggest thrill/priority. They can absolutely recover.

I should note it's really, really hard to get F.U.D. designation. It means the system has utterly failed someone. It's not a way of washing our hands of a patient (far from it), it's a way of indicating the limits of our collective technology. I've seen advances in the past few years that have turned former F.U.D.s into functional, productive people so F.U.D status isn't permanent. Recovery happens, even when professionals are stumped. Thankfully we don't know it all, and technology marches forward.

What kind of technological advancements have helped FUDs?
 
What kind of technological advancements have helped FUDs?
I mentioned emotional self-regulation teaching in the previous post, which is actually a huge one. In the past twenty years we (and when I say 'we' I mean the maladaptive psychology field regarding Western sufferers) has seen a huge increase in medical and psychological tools to help people who struggle with a host of personality disorders. I'm gonna focus on personality disorders and schizophrenia, since those comprise the majority of my experience. I no longer work in the corrections systems of my country, so I can't speak in regards to criminal psychiatry. Apologies for that omission.

As recently as 2003 or so, a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (which is itself p. fucking questionable, it's kinda the round bin of the psychiatry world for women) meant a dismal future indeed. But techniques for teaching individuals to self-parent and re-establish healthy identities frankly didn't exist. More than that, people didn't know what they needed. There was a general lull in the field of counselling because the prevailing wisdom dictated that talk-therapy was the only reliable way (they weren't wrong) and client just wanted RELIEF (which is pretty fucking vague and unhelpful), until some fantastic minds in North America pioneered very clever research.

CBT/DBT (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy/Dialectical Behavioural Therapy) are two fields of therapy which aren't wholly talk-based and instead focus on reprogramming the nervous system. They don't work for everyone, but they work for many people, often enough to be statistically significant.

I can't recommend CBT/DBT enough for people with personality disorders or even "failure to thrive". A good CBT course refreshes all the positive lessons a normal child learns, while refining the skills already established. For someone who lacks self sufficiency, the lessons of these courses are often world-shattering in their revelatory power. I've seen FUDs go into a CBT course, repeat it a few times, and then it clicks and they get a job and end up functional. I'm not talking about making superstars out of the dredges, I'm talking about turning someone on disability into someone who supports themselves, has an apartment, a cat and a girlfriend. That is huge. H U G E. We used to institutionalize such people. Massive advancements.

Chemically, there have been remarkable advancements made in how to treat BPDs and the demi-psychotic. A small dose of shotgun antipsychs plus some SSRNI's tends to help a lot of anxiety and low-grade psychosis. The chemical advancements really depend on the patient. Each one is different. A snowflake, if you will.
 
Here's something that's bugging me about this whole "genders outside of male/female" debate: How do you define a gender outside of the binary without either conforming to or explicitly defying gender stereotypes? I get that a lot of people using labels like that to describe themselves do so mostly for attention, but let's humor the idea that they're not just saying words they think sound nice. But the impression I get is that a lot of these gender activists want to have their cake and eat it too - they need to rely on gender stereotypes in order to define being "non-binary" or "genderfluid" or whatever while at the same time exclaiming that they're defying gender stereotypes because their perceived identity is at odds with their body.

With trans people, we can at least rely on more than their words. We got an idea of how your brain and your body can't agree on what they actually are, and since it's not only easier, but also more ethical to adjust the body than the brain, the consensus tends to be that the brain wins. However, once you throw in the notion that you can be somewhere in between "male" and "female", or neither, the whole thing ceases to make sense for me. Like, what does that mean, exactly, to be somewhere between those two supposed extremes, without relying on logic along the lines of "I like big cars, but I also like nail polish"? And let's not even get into describing genders that somehow don't rely on either.

I dunno, the whole thing just gives me a headache.
 
Back