Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a bear or a man? - aka Debate user doodoocaca on the validity of rape victims

Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a bear or a man?


  • Total voters
    199
lol I can't believe this nigga is actually saying the thing I said as a joke but unironically, I am so good at predicting male behavior.

"women are so dumb hurr durr they don't even know a bear is dangerous, strange men aren't at all dangerous to women, that's just female hysterics and it's more likely a man get falsely accused of rape than a woman be actually raped!!!"

:story:
 
I cannot help but reflect on how differently people who were hurt, or advocate for hurt people, act when compared to people who pretend to be victims for attention.

See, I'm both of the former. I know a few things that the victim lapers don't: who actually does the hurting, and how.

Most people don't actually go hurting others, unless you're a faggot who says that a middle finger in traffic or a raised voice is a microaggression or "almost rape".

Most of the harm done is with words, however. A minority of people who actually go hurting others actually commit violent acts. Women for myriad reasons love to gossip, accuse, slander, and basically act out the crucible over and over, and then wonder why men avoid them or talk down to them.
 
It's interesting that black bears kill a lot more people than polar bears, though.
Black bears are the most common bears in North America. The range of polar bears is pretty limited and sparsely populated, while black bears have a wide range that includes some fairly populated areas.

That said, you're still more likely to be killed by a bee or lightning than a bear of any kind. And of course you're more likely to be killed by a man than any other animal.
 
I cannot help but reflect on how differently people who were hurt, or advocate for hurt people, act when compared to people who pretend to be victims for attention.

See, I'm both of the former. I know a few things that the victim lapers don't: who actually does the hurting, and how.

Most people don't actually go hurting others, unless you're a faggot who says that a middle finger in traffic or a raised voice is a microaggression or "almost rape".

Most of the harm done is with words, however. A minority of people who actually go hurting others actually commit violent acts. Women for myriad reasons love to gossip, accuse, slander, and basically act out the crucible over and over, and then wonder why men avoid them or talk down to them.
lol holy shit you're an enormous faggot
 
lol holy shit you're an enormous faggot

You know - you're right. You're entirely right.

Altruism is stupid. Retarded, even. Spending 20 years trying to help others instead of only my self? Really, really fucking stupid. It's better to wear other people's injuries like a hairshirt, except inside out, as you do, than to actually deal with the problem.

My god, what a faggot I have been.
 
Sorry if this was already asked, but how come "woman" isn't an option in the poll? Obviously that's what you should pick

 
  • Autistic
Reactions: The Deep State
You know - you're right. You're entirely right.

Altruism is stupid. Retarded, even. Spending 20 years trying to help others instead of only my self? Really, really fucking stupid.
It's better to wear other people's injuries like a hairshirt, except inside out, as you do, than to actually deal with the problem.
How do you some of us aren’t trying to deal with the problem when faggots like you deny that such issues even exist in the first place?
 
I cannot help but reflect on how differently people who were hurt, or advocate for hurt people, act when compared to people who pretend to be victims for attention.

See, I'm both of the former. I know a few things that the victim lapers don't: who actually does the hurting, and how.

Most people don't actually go hurting others, unless you're a faggot who says that a middle finger in traffic or a raised voice is a microaggression or "almost rape".

Most of the harm done is with words, however. A minority of people who actually go hurting others actually commit violent acts. Women for myriad reasons love to gossip, accuse, slander, and basically act out the crucible over and over, and then wonder why men avoid them or talk down to them.
You might wanna stop posting on Kiwi Farms then if you have a problem with gossip and think mean words on the Internet are actual violence. Like how can you be on this gossip forum where the majority of the userbase is male and talk about how evil women are for gossiping and saying hurty words? Maybe a tranny discord is better suited for you.
 
I can't tell if this is just a shit test for white shitlib men by white shitlib women or some vain attempt to take attention back during an election year even though the DNC has completely abandoned women while still demanding donations.
little of both plus they just say it cause it gets you good goy victim points and you might not be invited to the next progressive get together if you don't answer bear
 
Depends on the bear. The scenario I've heard is "if you were alone at night which would you rather encounter", and if I saw a guy in the middle of the woods and he wasn't hunting he could be a killer, meanwhile if I stumbled into a black bear, the bear would be a little startled and run away. I would choose the man if I was certain the bear was a grizzly because those are more aggressive I think.
 
Bears don't use words, yet you voted for "Man", which can use words.

Yes, because a man is less dangerous, and does not use words the way women do. Your point is what?

little of both plus they just say it cause it gets you good goy victim points and you might not be invited to the next progressive get together if you don't answer bear

I forgot how worthless progressives are. This entire shitshow has been like a trip through memory lane and a tour-de-force of why shitty women need to be managed and kept in line by their betters.
 
there’s an awful lot of effort being made somewhere to make men and women hate each other. It’s like psychological population control
Indeed, and everyone is suffering from it, men and women.
bite his dick off, while he is expecting a blowjob.
Reminds me of that scene from Cross of Iron.
it just proves that women shouldn't have the right to vote.
Women should not be allowed to vote, but neither should most men. Universal suffrage is a mistake, so is democracy.

Someone else wrote a comment about how this is the one time dumb women care about statisitics, "now ask about blacks and pitbulls."This is absolutely correct. Men are much more violent than women, although I believe black women have higher rates of incarceration than white men. Point is men do have a much higher propensity for violence than women, on average. Truth is sexist in that way, just as truth is racist in terms of how blacks are also much more violent on average.
However, humans are sexually dimorphic. Because of that, and many other considerations besides, men-hating women need to understand that just as SOME men are the danger, most are the safety and security, and that is what is so insidious about this question. Ideally a woman is not out alone in the forest but is with a husband, or a brother or her father.

So much of this depends on context. I believe some bears are more apt to attack humans than others but I don't think any are habitual man killers. The question concerning a man in the woods depends so much on the variables, including race, region and location, high trust or low trust society. Homogenous, socalled "patriarchal" societies have adjusted the variables to such a degree the prospect of a man in the forrest is much more benign. The closer Europe and the West make a beeline to civilizational ruin...the more dangerous that prospect becomes. The extreme end of that is something out of Mad Max or even The Road.

Edit, some memes. Oh and as always a negative sticker from Android Raptor is an instant win scenario. INSTANT-WIN-SCENARIO.

GM3c434WIAA2y_s.jpegGM3Fhx9W4AABwRm.jpegGM3FEDiWoAAlwwH.jpegGM6LYbIXUAUSmEk.jpegGM3LH8eXcAEYFHd.jpeg
 
Last edited:
...men-hating women need to understand that just as SOME men are the danger, most are the safety and security, and that is what is so insidious about this question. Ideally a woman is not out alone in the forest but is with a husband, or a brother or her father.

Where you've gone wrong is thinking they don't. They do, they're almost certainly being intentionally obtuse because they've been socialized to lean into emotions put into them, or, socialized to cry victimhood in a politicized way, while also told to minimize criticisms of minorities.

They clearly know men aren't dangerous or they would not go outside, full stop. Likewise, they would not antagonize half of humanity unless they knew this was performative.
 
imagine writing essays\manifestos because some women would rather be mauled by a bear than deal with the average western man.

Your women just told you they would choose death over touching you.

Seeth harder,
Alright but specifically for you would you choose an Asian man, a bear, or a western man.
 
Last edited:
Back