Opinion You. This is your fault.

1653669526639.png

On Tuesday, a gunman targeted a fourth-grade classroom at an elementary school in Uvalde, Tex., killing 21 people, 19 of them children. On May 14, a gunman shot and killed 10 people at a supermarket in Buffalo. On April 12, a gunman shot 10 people in a Brooklyn, N.Y. subway station. We’re 145 days into the year and there have already been 213 mass shootings in the United States.

The problem is mental illness.

The problem is lone-wolf gunmen.

The problem is soft targets.

The problem is evil.

The problem is them, over there; it’s their fault that the kids keep getting killed.

Wrong. The problem is you.

Way back in 2008, then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was castigated for saying that some Americans “cling to guns,” and for suggesting that this was unreasonable or unhealthy. The evidence — which is to say the pileup of bodies year after year — suggests he was correct.

But other politicians, seeing the backlash, learned what not to say. They learned not to point fingers, because they knew that they, too, would be accused of hating freedom, loving tyranny, overreaching in pursuit of control. They understood that they would be shouted down and then perhaps voted out.

They learned not to say the obvious: These mass shootings aren’t acts of God. The status quo is bad. Our lack of action on guns is killing people, and someone is to blame.

But who?

You. It’s your fault.

You, the gun-obsessed minority who lord over our politics and prevent change from being made. You, who mumble “thoughts and prayers” but balk at action.

You, the constitutional absolutist who believes that “the right to bear arms” — written in the late 1700s, when a state-of-the-art weapon was the flintlock musket — should be expanded to include modern-day, high-capacity automatic rifles, at the cost of children’s lives.

You, the “shooting hobbyist” or “gun enthusiast” who advocates against gun control because you think anything that makes your weekend amusement even the slightest bit more difficult to participate in is not to be borne.

You, the performative patriot who believes that background checks, age limitations, training requirements — any reasonable regulations that could help keep people safe — are insufferable limitations on your freedom.

You, the sophist who says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” as if those people aren’t killing others using guns, as if it isn’t obvious that the havoc they wreak would be much reduced had they not been given easy access to weapons of mass murder.

You, the pundit who sneers that your opponents “don’t want a solution” and then refuses to provide your own, preferring to use a tragedy to build your brand.

You, who would rather forget about the children murdered and the families broken, because if we thought about them too much you’d feel bad and might have to give something up.

Lest I be accused of being one-sided, let’s not stop the finger-pointing there. If it’s a “you” problem, it’s an “us” problem, too — the United States and its culture writ large, right and left included.

A country that defines itself by its freedom — and has, over decades, fetishized a misguided ideal of “liberty” that values the individual over everyone and everything else.

A country that touts its dynamism yet dithers, its leaders wringing their hands and offering empty platitudes — “we have to find solutions,” “we must take action” — as if the solutions aren’t obvious, as if the actions one could take haven’t been modeled for us by other countries for decades.

A country that exports democracy but whose politicians pretend that their jobs are meaningless, who believe that when it comes to gun control, “legislation doesn’t work” — despite the fact that they were elected to write it.

It’s easy to find excuses for why this keeps happening. We’ve done it for decades. But the comforting fictions have worn thin, to the point of transparency.

It’s time to stop feigning helplessness. To stop pretending we are the ones under attack. To stop gaslighting the real victims, who have already suffered tragedy enough.

It’s time to admit that we — we Americans, and the rationalizations we tolerate — are to blame. Only then can we shoulder the responsibility to act.

1653669772239.png
Opinion by Christine Emba

Christine Emba is an opinion columnist and editor for The Post and the author of "Rethinking Sex: A Provocation." Before coming to The Post in 2015, Christine was the Hilton Kramer Fellow in Criticism at the New Criterion and a deputy editor at the Economist Intelligence Unit.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/26/uvalde-mass-shooting-inaction-on-guns-to-blame/ (A)
 
Hey, Christine Emba: go fuck yourself, negress.

You and your kind tell us global warming threatens us. You tell us global famine and more fuel shortages and food shortages are coming because of that and the Ukraine war.

Not to be a doomer…. but if that’s all true, if that all happens as you and your fellow WaPo “journalists” predict, we need guns to defend ourselves against those who’ll try to rob us for our food and our fuel. And if you want to defund the police well, it’ll be on us to protect our own.
Judging from the state of police these days, it doesn't seem to matter whether they're funded or not. They're just going to stand there with their dicks in their hands while we get slaughtered.
 
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but aren't longtime democrat cities with strict gun laws and many of the hard anti-gun types also the highest areas for gun violence?
They are, but they blame it on red states because their constituents apparently don't have free will or self-control. The damn dirty NRA and wypipo are making them do it.
 
You, the constitutional absolutist who believes that “the right to bear arms” — written in the late 1700s, when a state-of-the-art weapon was the flintlock musket — should be expanded to include modern-day, high-capacity automatic rifles, at the cost of children’s lives.
“Our rights should be limited to 18th century technology” says the faggot criticizing politicians on the Internet.
 
> Nigger journalists complaining about mass casualty events
> Doesn't realize her entire race is a mass casualty event

It is basically impossible to separate out the effects of """socioeconomic circumstances""" (read: race) on violence in American society from the impact of guns; mostly because academics adamantly refuse to come to any race-based conclusions.

Despite this, I think there's some pretty strong evidence that easy access to guns increases the seriousness of violence -- hard for a hood nigger teen to do a drive by without access to saturday night specials -- and I think domestics are probably worse when every asshole has a gun, but there's an absolute ton of defensive gun use in this country that these articles never focus on. How many women remain un-raped by these feral animals because of their hot pink subcompacts? How many home invasions foiled by a chest full of lead? How many Rittenhouses saved? All those kids were in one classroom; at least if the teacher had been armed, they would have had a chance. Hell, instead of training to wait and die, you could have had every adult in that building trained to try and keep the shooter pinned down.

America is basically just a loose collection of competing interests held together by the power of the Federal government at this point. No one is giving up their guns so they can be wantonly slaughtered by the groups that won't.
 
“Our rights should be limited to 18th century technology” says the faggot criticizing politicians on the Internet.
The easy workaround is the second amendment allowed the most advanced weapons platform of its time. Not having privately owned gunships and nukes is already a massive infringement.
 
The problem is them, over there; it’s their fault that the kids keep getting killed.

Wrong. The problem is you.
"You say the problem is The Other Side, referring to me, but you are wrong: the problem is The Other Side, referring to you"

We've got a modern day philosopher right here. This is the kind of deep thunking they'll write down in books for the next 2000 years.
 
Back