- Joined
- Jun 5, 2021
yo okay late but kevin talking about half the fun of having a pussy is sticking things in there but this fat faggot couldnt dilate properly?
also his moobs are fucking disgusting.
also his moobs are fucking disgusting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's only the fantasy of doing that which he likes. Dilating is very uncomfortable and way more so for a botched Amhole like Kevin has. Also he is lazy and obviously hates the mangled mess that was once his dick.yo okay late but kevin talking about half the fun of having a pussy is sticking things in there but this fat faggot couldnt dilate properly?
That's fucking retarded and is predicated on the idea that being "trans" exists at all. Wow, a faggot living in a time when you couldn't be a faggot would have preferred to be a woman -- how revolutionary. You think this man magically had a "female" brain or something? How the fuck does being trans exist in any meaningful way? And there's certainly no historical equivalent to what we're seeing nowadays. I guess Joan of Arc wearing armor so she wouldn't be raped must have secretly been a trans man all along as well.This is why i hate when troons keep transing the dead. They were exceedingly rare, but trans people did actually exist. We know this because the historical record makes a huge deal out of the few that did. I’m thinking of a man (can’t remember the name) who lived during the 13th century, and worked as a prostitute. Prostitution was legal at the time (though stigmatized), but homosexuality was not, and when this guy was arrested, he was like “I may be a whore, but I am no man.” And people’s minds were blown—why did this guy want to be a woman?! That’s the worst thing you could be! And they ended up bringing the guy back in several times just to try and get their heads around what his deal was. In the end, they just kind of said “well, that’s weird af buddy, but you do you, i guess.”
So if the historical record doesn't make a big deal out of a person living as the opposite sex, then they weren’t trans.
so, theyre gonna chop off his nips for the implants or whatever, and sew them back on right? maybe theyll fall off.
Yeah I don't really think there is such a thing as a tranny. If there's a 'Y' you're a guy. Gender is not on a spectrum. Full stop.That's fucking retarded and is predicated on the idea that being "trans" exists at all. Wow, a faggot living in a time when you couldn't be a faggot would have preferred to be a woman -- how revolutionary. You think this man magically had a "female" brain or something? How the fuck does being trans exist in any meaningful way? And there's certainly no historical equivalent to what we're seeing nowadays. I guess Joan of Arc wearing armor so she wouldn't be raped must have secretly been a trans man all along as well.
His mewbs are so far apart that in the Tranch yearbook Kevin's photo is gonna be horizontal.Jesus Christ his toobs are placed on his body like a horses eyes. Those niggers have different zip codes. Like, when you wanna do close-up photos, you shouldn’t have to take two separate photos of them the way he had to. It’s like he took 2 party hats and strapped them to either side of a fucking barrel.![]()
I mean I don't wanna sperg too much about trannies because it's really beside the point, but even under their own logic it's quite meaningless. The current bullshit they're forcing people to spout is that some people magically develop a different "brain sex" than their physical sex and act like this is some biological reality and medical consensus that anyone who isn't retarded believes in. As if it's some gotcha that means transwomen are totally women all along.Yeah I don't really think there is such a thing as a tranny. If there's a 'Y' you're a guy. Gender is not on a spectrum. Full stop.
Gender expression is certainly on a spectrum. No one's debating that, obviously.
This confusion is what happens when you have a current-year mob mentality that crucifies anyone that dares bring uppainfulbasic truths about sex and biology. You have biology professors across academia afraid of losing their jobs so they keep quiet or kick the can down the road.
it magnifies it in sane people and kiwi's heads that he's doing it for the fetish because he's so goddamn defensive about it
At least a GBP patient has to lose a certain amount of weight before they’ll do the surgery.I see a lot of parallels between trannies and deathfats when it comes to their thoughts on "the surgery." For deathfats it's gastric bypass which they think is a magic pill that will instantly cure all their problems, when in reality it's an operation that requires a permanent and significant lifestyle change to be successful. You have to change who you are as a person to make it work, and a lot of fatties simply won't do that. You see it with trannies and amholes too, they think having a neovagina carved into them is going to magically end their mental anguish and once they have had "the surgery" they won't have to do anything more. See Kevin's refusal to dilate. Dilation is a necessary part of his life now but he's simply too lazy and stupid to do it, just like fatties who are too lazy and stupid to change their eating habits after they've had gastric bypass, who go right to being fat again and in certain circumstances, die when their stomach basically explodes from them eating too much relative to its reduced capacity post-surgery.
That dude’s hair is too nice to be Kev. Otherwise, spot on.I'm a few pages behind - but I finally remembered who Kevin reminds me of
I wasn’t saying that the dude wasn’t mentally ill, i was just just pointing out that this type mental illness has always been extremely rare, and that the historical record refutes TRAs’ attempts to make any GNC figure “trans” in an effort to justify the increasing number of troons we see today (a point i agree with you on: there are definitely more trans-identified people today than there ever were throughout history). This also refutes TRAs’ claim that trans people were so persecuted, that they were just “afraid to come out”. Because most people who insisted on living as the opposite sex were given cart blanche to do so (see: women who pretended to be men so they could join monasteries—when they were found out, it was actually considered a level-up for them. “Wow, this woman managed to overcome her lustful female nature and become a monk—good on her!”)You think this man magically had a "female" brain or something? How the fuck does being trans exist in any meaningful way? And there's certainly no historical equivalent to what we're seeing nowadays. I guess Joan of Arc wearing armor so she wouldn't be raped must have secretly been a trans man all along as well.
I have to wonder where this man lived, if he somehow got away with his life, despite claiming to be a woman. As even something like transvestitism was seen as abhorrent and immoral (which it rightfully is). So how could a man claiming to be a woman have gotten off scot-free?This is why i hate when troons keep transing the dead. They were exceedingly rare, but trans people did actually exist. We know this because the historical record makes a huge deal out of the few that did. I’m thinking of a man (can’t remember the name) who lived during the 13th century, and worked as a prostitute. Prostitution was legal at the time (though stigmatized), but homosexuality was not, and when this guy was arrested, he was like “I may be a whore, but I am no man.” And people’s minds were blown—why did this guy want to be a woman?! That’s the worst thing you could be! And they ended up bringing the guy back in several times just to try and get their heads around what his deal was. In the end, they just kind of said “well, that’s weird af buddy, but you do you, i guess.”
So if the historical record doesn't make a big deal out of a person living as the opposite sex, then they weren’t trans.
I guess Joan of Arc wearing armor so she wouldn't be raped must have secretly been a trans man all along as well.
Works for incel-logicOh, he's a manlet? Well then it's perfectly reasonable for him to beat women.
Eh… medieval anti-sodomy laws were… interesting. “Sodomy” was simply an umbrella term that meant “any kind of sex that couldn’t result in pregnancy”, and homosexuality fell under this umbrella. Occasionally whomever was running the church would start a push to denounce the sinfulness of sodomy (usually just amounting to making people confess and pay penance), but peoples’ reactions to this were mixed. They also weren't supposed to have sex during Lent, but the number of babies born nine months after sometime during Lent proves that they still did.I have to wonder where this man lived, if he somehow got away with his life, despite claiming to be a woman. As even something like transvestitism was seen as abhorrent and immoral (which it rightfully is). So how could a man claiming to be a woman have gotten off scot-free?
I suppose I can see the logic there, since rationality isn't the basis for why someone has sex. At least when the intent isn't mere procreation. And having too much would mean one's lustful proclivities are too great a focus, and thus best avoided. Though I personally find it unfortunate more wasn't done to go against that kind of thing, in those days. Though I'm sure it was more than what's done now, considering what efforts are being made to accept things like bestiality and pedophilia. However ineffective those efforts might be.Male homosexuality was looked down upon because it was considered something that made men more feminine and less “rational” (interestingly, having too much straight sex was considered to have the same effect).
Cue Kevin tweeting about howIt could be a good adjacent grift for a private practice doctor: Well...that's a bit...concerning. ((taps several times on ipad)) ((hands him paper)) On your way out, pass this to the receptionist and wait. I'm going to need some labwork today. And we'll need to schedule you for a biopsy. There are several...concerning areas in the vestibule of your...vaginal canal. We just want to rule out anything serious, like cancer...
Technically speaking it still does. In the Catholic Church the term "sin of Sodom" means "any sexual act that can't result in pregnancy".“Sodomy” was simply an umbrella term that meant “any kind of sex that couldn’t result in pregnancy”
would anyone care if some dudes were like "yeah, I like to wear skinny jeans and makeup, and sometimes I even wear skirts, but I'm still a dude" and like, didn't try to use the women's room or demand people call him a girl? I know most people wouldn't cause anyone who remembers the mid-2000's emo craze where dudes wearing eyeliner and dressing flamboyantly was trendy remembers that this wasn't a big deal. this is why I can't accept it when people say "troons just want to live their lives in peace" cause for a bunch of people who just want to live their lives, they sure love making a lot of demands of everyone else.Yeah I don't really think there is such a thing as a tranny. If there's a 'Y' you're a guy. Gender is not on a spectrum. Full stop.
Gender expression is certainly on a spectrum. No one's debating that, obviously.
what's braver: having people giggle behind your back, or getting shot at? tough question
Isn't AIDS now a heckin valid identity that's on the new Buttsex pride flag? Why not include awkward 12 year olds and castrated transsexuals on there as well? make it extra silly.Well, even though the founder of AVEN himself doesn't think it makes sense to include Aces with the LGB (cue reddit asexuals crying about acephobia), I will agree that it makes more sense to lump aces in with gays than it does to let trannies be part of the alphabet.
Maybe the reason those people are laughing to themselves is because they're friends, and they enjoy spending time together. A foreign concept, I know."Going outside alone & visibly trans makes you truly braver than the marines."
View attachment 2616624
Link | Archive
Rioley. Are you saying you couldn’t find a vegan restaurant in SanFran? So you’re stupid as well as mentally ill?
You can’t improve by tracing, though. Especially if you’re not even going to bother learning perspective first.He's still tracing I see. It looks this time like he's combining multiple references and then tracing the jigsaw puzzle of the pieces. I can tell its traced because all the parts from the different photographs have different perspectives which clash as opposed to all being conformed to the same perspective planes. Besides the boring technical reasons, we know his art isn't complete potato quality only when he traces. He's a novice and has not yet studied art trying to improve
The nerve of this cunt telling off a bartender for not acknowledging his specialness. If it were not for the fact that i’m 100% certain this conversation didn’t happen (or at least the ending didn’t happen), i’d be pissed off