I've just watched it, and my reaction to the film is somewhat mixed. I liked the score, cinematography, locations, acting, dialogue, and character development, but the ending was too left-field and depressing for my taste, and the villain's motivations made no sense. There were various plot contrivances throughout the film which tested my patience, and even without this, the premise of the movie was a bit too far-fetched by itself.
Now that Craig's era as Bond is over, I'd really like to see a Bond film which focuses upon the actual job of espionage (like the early movies with Connery did), rather than showcase grandiose plots about world domination. The stories can still be gripping without turning the lead into a superhero; arguably, they'd be even more gripping, since they'd be more grounded and believable, like
Casino Royale initially promised to be.
The MCU has destroyed movies in more ways than one. Now there's a desperate obsession with canon and continuity and everyone being interconnected, so of course White was behind everything and Bond falls in love with his daughter while battling a foster brother who grew up to become the world's greatest villain.
This is what ruined the Sherlock TV series with Benedict Cumberbatch as well. Like the pre-reboot Bond movies, what made the Sherlock Holmes novels great was that they were episodic: you could read/watch them in any order and enjoy them just the same because none of the stories necessarily directly followed or preceded any of the others. Each one told it's own story, and because each story has an end, the viewer/reader can feel satisfied that there is closure.
By linking everything together, you diminish the enjoyment the audience gets from each installment, because they aren't getting a complete story. It's also a vehicle for lazy writing in my opinion, because the writers can tease the viewers/readers with the idea that something interesting is about to happen in a future installment, without actually having to provide it.