Off-Topic When did you hit peak trans and why? - Finally realized that trans activism and gender ideology are harmful.

Morality is just an imposition on others to this insane libertarian ideology.

Interestingly enough, it was transgenderism that also helped me reach "peak libertarian."

The realization that yes, we do need the state to "legislate morality," because immoral activities like drug use, prostitution, transgenderism, homosexuality, etc are not victimless crimes. They always cause societal decay, and undermines freedom, no less, because the people who engage in such acts either insist that everyone else to shoulder the burden of the consequences of their actions, or they're so deeply insecure about their alternative lifestyle that they cannot coexist with those who do not like their lifestyle without throwing a sperg fit.

These people will go out of their way to ruin the lives of other people if they don't play retarded games of pretend with them, an obvious violation of the "non-aggression principle." But the question is, why the fuck are we letting them get to that point? Allowing them to degrade to the point where they experience unrelenting emotional pain and anguish unless they force the rest of the universe to cater to their unreasonable, narcissistic demands?

Troons are a direct threat to free and safe societies, troons will always try to tear other people down, asking them to respect the rights of others is asking too much of them because they're psychologically incapable of doing so. I don't care if it's "authoritarian," it should be against the law to troon out. You shouldn't be allowed to change your legal documents to reflect your "gender identity," any doctor that would ever administer HRT or GRS should be given a life sentence, and the right to tell others that YWNBAW or YWNBAM should be protected at all costs.
 
Last edited:
I don't think its ever just one peak. I suppose "peak trans" is like when people hit the point where they finally go "Okay, fuck these people", but I feel like its more a mountain range. Each peak higher than the last. And even before then, the foothills that send you on the path.
Probably the earliest is when a real life friend transed and I was chatting to an online buddy and he basically asked me something genuinely innocent on his part I think. He asked basically how do you know you're trans? And I kinda couldn't give a solid answer beyond vagueness.
Then it was Tumblr shit, like "genderfluid" "non-binary" etc. I never bought into it and it just felt so stupid, like people trying to feel unique (which it was).
Then stuff like the North Carolina bathroom bill and the reaction to it. Even though I still wasn't gender crit/TERF mode, I took notice in the entirely disproportionate reaction from the media and from celebrities about this shit. And any time people with money react so strongly, I get suspicious.
Then, a big one, was them reacting to a benign statement from Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. Basically, she said that women are women and trans women are trans women, because they don't experience the same things. Such as trans women are socialized male and are literally outwardly male in every single way in the first half of their lives, even if they "feel" female. So they reap the benefits of outwardly being male.
Rachel Dolezal and the discussion over why is changing "sex"/gender okay, but not race.
Our friend Yaniv.
Hanging out in TERFy spaces.
A little bit of Magdalen Berns. Shit, I wish she was still around to dissect Dylan and Keffarts and the troons of today.
This article https://suedonym.substack.com/p/inauthentic-selves-the-modern-lgbtq
And basically every degenerate thing that has been catalogued since then.
 
Last edited:
What is this whole 'socialized male/female' thing anyway
Male and female children are treated differently based on gender role-related expectations.

Even if you argue that certain traits are inherent in males/females and aren't socialized into them, then those traits are still expected and encouraged in children.

So if you're a tranny, you've been raised for a significant portion of your life to behave in a certain way relating to your birth sex/gender. You can't undo years of conditioning in a short time, so the tranny will still hold certain subconscious thoughts and behavior patterns because that was what was reinforced in them for years.

For example: let us assume that males are expected to be more confrontational, assertive, and take leadership. Male children will be encouraged to show these traits and they will be expected to behave this way.
Let's conversely assume that females are expected to be accommodating, submissive, and go along with things rather than take leadership. Female children will be encouraged to show these traits and behave this way.

Now we put "Sapphire" the penised transwoman in with a group of ciswomen. Sapphire will have been raised as Steve for years and will naturally have started to behave in a "male" way. Even if Sapphire "felt like a girl," they were raised as a boy. So Sapphire will be more comfortable being confrontational and assertive since they were raised with positive enforcement for those traits.

Could this be the reason why transwomen feel the need to insert themselves into every single woman-only space and co-opt all women-only language? Hmmmmmmmmmmm.

Pro-trans people hate this point because they seem to assume that all of that social conditioning is immediately erased as soon as Sapphire puts on a dress.
 
What is this whole 'socialized male/female' thing anyway
The basic issue is that BUT YOU CAN'T CHANGE BIOLOGICAL SEX is ultimately not a super convincing argument against social / legal recognition.

So, some people argue that because TiM's were not raised/socialized as women, they can never truly be women in some sort of social sense, and therefore should not be recognized as such in a legal sense. You could call this the "nurture" argument.

It is possible to challenge this by bringing up all kinds of what-if's and special cases. What if we trans infants straight from the womb, for example? What about genuine intersex people? etc. etc.

Another line of argument would be to go back to biology and argue women and men are socially just too different by nature.

This makes some people queasy, and it can also be challenged quite easily. What about passing trans people? And again, what about genuine intersex people? etc. etc.

This (to ONLY consider grey-area & outlier cases and pursue perfect internal consistency) is of course an extremely autistic way to think about complex social issues. It is possible to take a more holistic approach and argue a wider social point while admitting there are difficult questions without clear answers.
 
Interestingly enough, it was transgenderism that also helped me reach "peak libertarian."

The realization that yes, we do need the state to "legislate morality," because immoral activities like drug use, prostitution, transgenderism, homosexuality, etc are not victimless crimes. They always cause societal decay, and undermines freedom, no less, because the people who engage in such acts either insist that everyone else to shoulder the burden of the consequences of their actions, or they're so deeply insecure about their alternative lifestyle that they cannot coexist with those who do not like their lifestyle without throwing a sperg fit.

These people will go out of their way to ruin the lives of other people if they don't play retarded games of pretend with them, an obvious violation of the "non-aggression principle." But the question is, why the fuck are we letting them get to that point? Allowing them to degrade to the point where they experience unrelenting emotional pain and anguish unless they force the rest of the universe to cater to their unreasonable, narcissistic demands?

Troons are a direct threat to free and safe societies, troons will always try to tear other people down, asking them to respect the rights of others is asking too much of them because they're psychologically incapable of doing so. I don't care if it's "authoritarian," it should be against the law to troon out. You shouldn't be allowed to change your legal documents to reflect your "gender identity," any doctor that would ever administer HRT or GRS should be given a life sentence, and the right to tell others that YWNBAW or YWNBAM should be protected at all costs.
Libertarian ideology is poison when it comes to any of kind of social contagion or decay. Its basically saying "The house over the street is on fire but mine isn't so it doesn't affect me, why should I care?"

I said the same thing some time ago on why I think "iTs A FReE COunTrY" and "wHAt OtHER PEOplE dO WiTh THeIR boDY DoESn'T aFfEct Me"
What an unbelievably selfish and irresponsible mindset to have, no fuck that. If an idiot wants to maul himself society should step in and say "No, you're a retard, we won't let you do that."

Humans are social beings, we rely on one another and we're supposed to protect one another. Letting a person who could live a perfectly happy and healthy life destroy themselves because "who cares it doesn't affect me lfmao" is aggressively retarded.

Even ignoring the medical and financial drain on resources that person is innevitably going to be its still going to damage the social fabric of society by sending the message this society has no boundaries or limits.

And even ignoring THAT, its still another fucking human being you're essentially letting commit preventable suicide because you can't be fucked to help.

I swear to god libertarians are unironically fucking worse than sjws.
 
Always felt uncomfortable with the violent “TERFs Go Die” rhetoric even when I was deeply entrenched in the trans/egg ideology, but the thing that broke the spell was one very stupid line from one very stupid trainwreck of a show:

71AB8E20-6573-469E-9D7D-24B1414A54A9.jpeg

Yes, it’s fucking High Guardian Spice, and no, I didn’t actually watch it. But in this scene the self insert transgender teacher is giving the redheaded twink gender advice and says something along the lines of “transition was my path, but it might not be yours, there’s a billion ways to be yourself” and I was like holy shit. I’m fat and ugly and like cars but none of that is mutually exclusive with having tits.

Don’t know why I didn’t fall into the nonbinary cope, but part of it is probably because that’s what’s “in” right now and identifying as a wahmen is, paradoxically, more counterculture.

(Side note: around this time I also played persona 4 and the amount of people claiming naoto is trans lmao. No she just wants to be respected at her job and pretending to be a boy was the easiest way to do it, did you even play the fucking game, faggot)

I peaked once I saw how people in similar situations to me bought into the idea that liking boy things and hating your body = you’re trans, and at the time I already had the gender conversation with my therapist and was seriously considering ordering steroids off the Internet thanks to the egg thing. And of course, anything other than 100% support gets you ostracized from LGBTQA communities, which led to me deleting my Discord (it was full of minors anyway… not fun) and participating in increasingly radicalized forums.

The desister to TERF pipeline is real
 
To give my own take, I never really was fully lib leaning, for the most part I wasn't that concerned with the subject other than a generic "Just leave them alone" thing so I never had an actual "peak" trans, but as the thing entered the mainstream and I became more involved in politics the more I saw libs feverishly defend lgbt stuff against (what at the time seemed) all reason, the more I looked into it, and it was just a general compounding list of lies and deceptions peddled by both gays and trannies that started pitting me against them.

The more I looked it into it the more I saw that the entire lgbt movement was built on lies by malicious people to the point where the "fundies" I once mocked and derided for being crazy cooks ended up being being proven basically 100% right about basically everything, trannies included.

It wasn't exactly a "peak trans" it was more of a "peak lgbt".

Case in point:


I can't get from blue suit dude to pink shirt dude, because again, gays getting married impacts two people - the gays who are getting married. It means nothing to anybody else, except, like, insurance providers. Nobody around them is impacted by gays getting married or being generally gay.
Not really. Marriage is a public institution not a private one and it imapcts literally everyone, not just the people being married. Why do you think that as far back as recorded history goes it was ordained and managed by the local authority? If it only affected the people being married then there would be no reason for every single authority in the history of mankind to become involved in it.

Marriage doesn't exist to profess how much you love getting anal fissures or to get free money via taxes. Since time immemorial it existed to provide a stable enviroment to rear children. "Matrimony" literally means "To make a mother" because it was recognized that that was its function. Raising children is the literal future of society which is why it came with these benefits such as tax breaks.

Gays shoving themselves in places they didn't belong (as per usual) is what opened the door for trannies to also start shoving themselves in places they don't belong. Two things are absolutely connected, also what helped me see through the the tranny and the greater LGBT facade.

Gays were lying and bullshitting to cheat society out of benefits they didn't earn nor deserve (literally exactly like trannies), and on the scale of deviance gays are more foundational than trannies. If the foundation was built on bullshit why wouldn't the rest of the movement be?

The entire LGBT movement from top to bottom is just selfish deviants trying to figure out how to fuck over society for their own benefit instead of even attempting to become functional members of society, the sole reason gays are turning on trannies now after half a century long alliance is because its no longer convininent. The whole thing is rotten to the core.
And again, what about genuine intersex people? etc. etc.
This point pisses me off everytime its brought up and it was also part of what made me see how bullshit the whole trans thing is, as it points how willing the LGBTs are willing to miscontrue science and data to further their ends.

Even IF intersex people were more than 0.0001% of the population they would still be irrelevant because intersex people are not between the two sexes, there has never been a single human in or outside history that had fully formed fully functioning genitals of both sexes. People hear intersex and being coombrains they instantly think its like hermaphrodite anime porn, its not.

Intersex people in 99.999% of cases still neatly fit into either a male or female box. The ONLY exception where things get a bit complicated with a single condition called androgen insensitivity where a malfunctioning SRY gene means that people with XY chromosomes are immune to androgens and develop a female phenotype as a result.

And you know what? That's STILL irrelevant because its not those people trooning out., its healthy men and women with no other issues.

The answer to the troon debate is quite simple, men and women both physically and mentally are just inately different, the issue is that terfs which are the main opposition to trannies don't actually disagree with them on anything, they just hate men, so its just a pissing match where nobody can raise any points because if they did everyone would notice how similar they are.
 
Marriage doesn't exist to profess how much you love getting anal fissures or to get free money via taxes. Since time immemorial it existed to provide a stable enviroment to rear children. "Matrimony" literally means "To make a mother" because it was recognized that that was its function. Raising children is the literal future of society which is why it came with these benefits such as tax breaks.
By this logic, straight cisgender people who don't want children (or are barren/sterile) shouldn't be allowed to get married either.
 
Always felt uncomfortable with the violent “TERFs Go Die” rhetoric even when I was deeply entrenched in the trans/egg ideology, but the thing that broke the spell was one very stupid line from one very stupid trainwreck of a show:

View attachment 4108386

Yes, it’s fucking High Guardian Spice, and no, I didn’t actually watch it. But in this scene the self insert transgender teacher is giving the redheaded twink gender advice and says something along the lines of “transition was my path, but it might not be yours, there’s a billion ways to be yourself” and I was like holy shit. I’m fat and ugly and like cars but none of that is mutually exclusive with having tits.

Don’t know why I didn’t fall into the nonbinary cope, but part of it is probably because that’s what’s “in” right now and identifying as a wahmen is, paradoxically, more counterculture.

(Side note: around this time I also played persona 4 and the amount of people claiming naoto is trans lmao. No she just wants to be respected at her job and pretending to be a boy was the easiest way to do it, did you even play the fucking game, faggot)

I peaked once I saw how people in similar situations to me bought into the idea that liking boy things and hating your body = you’re trans, and at the time I already had the gender conversation with my therapist and was seriously considering ordering steroids off the Internet thanks to the egg thing. And of course, anything other than 100% support gets you ostracized from LGBTQA communities, which led to me deleting my Discord (it was full of minors anyway… not fun) and participating in increasingly radicalized forums.

The desister to TERF pipeline is real
It's pretty telling that the only place where transgenderism works even close to the way it does in their head is a world that is literally magical. Sometimes art says more about the artist than the artist wants it to.
 
By this logic, straight cisgender people who don't want children (or are barren/sterile) shouldn't be allowed to get married either.
Normal people who don't want children right now are still capable of producting children and may change their minds in the future especially with the extra economic conviniences marriage will give them.

By contrast, it doesn't matter how much cum you dump in a colon, its never getting fertilized. A possibility of benefitting society in the future is still far better than no chance of benefitting society in the future.

(or are barren/sterile)

The result of sexual acts between infertile partners is non-procreative due to a failure of a natural function that we recognize as a failure and are actively looking for cures and treatments for.

Sexual acts between homosexuals are incapable of producing children as an inate property and the mere suggestion of looking for a cure for homosexuality just like we do for infertility is considered haram by the progressives.

The two things are incomperable.

Its just another case of trannies and gays sharing the same disingenuous playbook of using edge cases to justify their depravity.

"But what about intersex people?" You're not intersex and neither are 99.99% of trannies.

"But what about infertile people?" You're not infertile and being infertile isn't an active behaviour you chose to engage in.
 
Its just another case of trannies and gays sharing the same disingenuous playbook of using edge cases to justify their depravity.

"But what about intersex people?" You're not intersex and neither are 99.99% of trannies.

"But what about infertile people?" You're not infertile and being infertile isn't an active behaviour you chose to engage in.
To be fair, you too seem to be using the same TRA playbook by claiming radical feminists don't disagree with trannies on any issue. The page is titled monumental nonsensicalities and is used by TRA's to make such claims as 'men can become women'.
 
Always felt uncomfortable with the violent “TERFs Go Die” rhetoric even when I was deeply entrenched in the trans/egg ideology, but the thing that broke the spell was one very stupid line from one very stupid trainwreck of a show:

View attachment 4108386
I'm glad it helped you. I have actually watched this show though, and the good of that scene is undone by the end, where he starts dressing like a girl fulltime and its strongly suggested he's going to trans. That is if they had another season. Mercifully, they didn't.
 
To be fair, you too seem to be using the same TRA playbook by claiming radical feminists don't disagree with trannies on any issue. The page is titled monumental nonsensicalities and is used by TRA's to make such claims as 'men can become women'.
Both radical feminists and trannies are claiming that there are no real differences between men and women. Feminists use it to explain why men are unjustly oppressing women (We're the same, ergo any differences in occupations and outcomes are becomes men are oppressing women) and trannies use it to explain why can become women (If we're the same, then why can't I be a woman?).

Feminists created trannies by demanding a world of unlimited permissiveness. Its why they share the same fundumentals.
 
Both radical feminists and trannies are claiming that there are no real differences between men and women. Feminists use it to explain why men are unjustly oppressing women (We're the same, ergo any differences in occupations and outcomes are becomes men are oppressing women) and trannies use it to explain why can become women (If we're the same, then why can't I be a woman?).

Feminists created trannies by demanding a world of unlimited permissiveness. Its why they share the same fundumentals.
Why the feminist objection to men in women's sports then, as cheating? Why establish domestic violence shelters etc? Recognising the unique biological differences that mean women are innately physically weaker and so require women only spaces is kind of the difference between TERFs and TRAs.
 
I still feel like the topic as a whole is a mainstream media, government psyop, they're such a small percentage of the populace that if their existence wasn't amplified they would be nearly completely ignored, all of the RamzPaul type people who spend hours of each day raging over them and fanning the flames of hysteria are suspicious in their fascination with the topic and perpetuate its relevancy and in doing so create more tranny fag attention whores and obviously want to become one themselves.
 
Why the feminist objection to men in women's sports then, as cheating? Why establish domestic violence shelters etc? Recognising the unique biological differences that mean women are innately physically weaker and so require women only spaces is kind of the difference between TERFs and TRAs.
They pick and choose the similarities and differences they want depending on what's convinient. If men and women are different physically and mentally then there is no excuse to complain about difference in societal outcomes, responsibilities and expectations, yet they still do. Male dominated fields are male dominated because men think different, not becuase men are keeping women out.

Just like trannies they like to pretend that biology stops at the neck, and they started that trend which is how trannies picked up on it.
 
Back