- Joined
- Aug 31, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correct. There's no reality where they grant Trump immunity for pre-presidential actions.Barnes is wrong again.
View attachment 6038691
The supreme court is HIGHLY likely to only cover immunity to presidential acts (which is the current precedent), of which trumps actions concerning the 2020 elections are covered. But an alleged hush money payment wouldn't be covered as a presidential act.
@Hraf in the Rekieta criminal case thread did some research on the Amos Miller case.I caught a little bit of his constitutional violations analysis stream yesterday. One of the things he talked about was the danger of having the government label any substance as a controlled substance to use this to take away Second Amendment rights and custody of children. The example he was using to cast this as an absurdity was a case in Pennsylvania where the state is trying to stop farmer Amos Miller from selling his milk.
I can understand this argument from a high level, but we aren't talking about milk, we're talking about cocaine. A lot of cocaine. I do not appreciate the effort to conflate the two. I don't know if he believes his own arguments, or if he is just hoping that his audience does. If I were a member of the jury and this argument was used on me, I would probably lean closer to the death penalty, even if it isn't on the table.
As an aside, searching Amos Miller's case, it looks like that milk is apparently testing positive for listeria and E. coli, and he is being provided a valiant defense by Robert Barnes himself as his lawyer! Good luck with your efforts to keep potentially infected milk in the hands, stomachs, guts, and hearts of everyday Americans!
(Media Link 1 | Archive)
(Media Link 2 | Archive)
(PA AG Link | Archive)
Per the allegations Amos Miller sold raw milk over state lines. This is illegal. Several e.coli cases and several possible deaths from listeria were linked to Amos Miller. He is a perpetual litigant as he will accept a settlement with the government and then not comply. Aww shucks, ya hona', I'm just some dumb Amish, I can't figure out all these legal things. Despite the fact that he's apparently opened multiple companies in his employees names to continue running his mail order raw milk "Private Member Association". Can the Amish use dry ice? How the hell are they shipping raw milk?In an emailed statement, Miller's attorney, Robert Barnes, said: "The lawsuit by the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture is a disgrace to the rule of law, a flagrant violation of Constitutional liberty, and filled with false, fraudulent and perjurious statements by corrupt, out of control high ranking officials too often covered for by complicit media. Amos Miller's food is much healthier, much safer and much better for members, as they make informed consent decisions to choose, than the monopolized, industrialized food of big corporations the PDA is subservient to, and those members have a Constitutional right to get direct farm-to-consumer food they trust as members of a private association. We will respond to the food thieves, farm libelers, and Amish defamers of the PDA in court, and we will bring the truth, unlike the PDA, which feasts on a diet of libelous lies."
Ooooohhhhhh... I knew there was something weird going on with this one. Especially because Barnes was twit-quoting weird people with weird theories about lactose intolerance: that lactose intolerance is a lie and we get it, because we DON'T drink raw milk or that there's lactase in raw milk produced by breasts. I mean I knew that American schools are a joke and I had my biochem classes some time ago, but I'm pretty sure if breasts produced an enzyme digesting the thing they produce, there would be no milk flowing. (I also didn't find any reasonable source of this claim and even had a friend search for it in the sci-paper's database she has access through her uni. Nothing). That the way to get rid of lactose intolerance is to drink more raw milk. Like dude, no.Per the allegations Amos Miller sold raw milk over state lines. This is illegal. Several e.coli cases and several possible deaths from listeria were linked to Amos Miller. He is a perpetual litigant as he will accept a settlement with the government and then not comply. Aww shucks, ya hona', I'm just some dumb Amish, I can't figure out all these legal things. Despite the fact that he's apparently opened multiple companies in his employees names to continue running his mail order raw milk "Private Member Association". Can the Amish use dry ice? How the hell are they shipping raw milk?
Barnes is the quintessential example of "If you have the facts, pound the facts, if you have the law, pound the law, if you have neither, pound the table." Though in Barnes's case it's pound conspiracy theories about the one world government in a case about food poisoning.
I'll also take Null's side here and say that raw milk cheese and milk tastes better but not getting E.Coli is better.
They're eating their own kek
The lawtube collapse. Say whatever you want about Nick (may he lay in his own filth) but he was smart enough to not form a clique because they always always collapse. He just didn't predict HE would be the reason for that collapse lmao
Interesting didn't know that he was doing that.Per the allegations Amos Miller sold raw milk over state lines. This is illegal. Several e.coli cases and several possible deaths from listeria were linked to Amos Miller. He is a perpetual litigant as he will accept a settlement with the government and then not comply. Aww shucks, ya hona', I'm just some dumb Amish, I can't figure out all these legal things. Despite the fact that he's apparently opened multiple companies in his employees names to continue running his mail order raw milk "Private Member Association". Can the Amish use dry ice? How the hell are they shipping raw milk?
Barnes is a retard and he's wrong. But the acts Trump was convicted were during his Presidency. It was multiple payments to Cohen after inauguration.Correct. There's no reality where they grant Trump immunity for pre-presidential actions.
Barnes is actually a retard.
The steel man argument for this is that the "underlying crime" was started and acted upon prior to the election. Money was wired on October 27th according to WSJ, so the planning and agreements would have to have happened before then, which is all prior to the elections in November. Therefore, the "record falsification" (and I'm using that term loosely here since payments to a lawyer labeled "legal fees" isn't the false people think of) is a continuation of the underlying crime.Barnes is a retard and he's wrong. But the acts Trump was convicted were during his Presidency. It was multiple payments to Cohen after inauguration.
It's comical how his hubris constantly undermines him. If he'd just left it at "the judge flagrantly violated almost every right the defense is entitled to in a criminal trial, meaning the moment his appeal hits a fair court the conviction will almost certainly be vacated" he would have walked away from an easy W. But no, he has to one up everyone by running with this bullshit about that the SCOTUS decision on immunity applies to a case specifically designed to pre-empt presidential immunity.The steel man argument for this is that the "underlying crime" was started and acted upon prior to the election. Money was wired on October 27th according to WSJ, so the planning and agreements would have to have happened before then, which is all prior to the elections in November. Therefore, the "record falsification" (and I'm using that term loosely here since payments to a lawyer labeled "legal fees" isn't the false people think of) is a continuation of the underlying crime.
Rumble was a Canadian company before moving to Florida so perhaps it's all copacetic. Also, Barnes and Viva might have written the speech policy for Rumble or simply made suggestions to be reviewed.The Rekieta civil war has gotten Andrew thinking about Viva and Barnes connection to rumble.
View attachment 6044977
I had my suspicions but now as they said I have "taken my time and done the research" and it is entirely clear to me that Robert Barnes is a fucking nigger. And he is using that vest to also hide the fact that he is a fat faggot with bitch tits. Sneed.From the locals ep 213 stream:
Kiwibros, we're being slandered again!!!
View attachment 6049320
About LEGUL MINDSET:
View attachment 6049344
Coping and Sneeding about "Toxic Twitter" and LawTube:
View attachment 6049352
About NateTheLawyer:
View attachment 6049359
This moron realizes that we aren't trying anymore, we did, right?Kiwibros, we're being slandered again!!!
He moved to Korea initially, and is now hopping between countries playing visa games. Theory in the lawtube thread, with evidence, is that he ran up a bunch of credit card debt and then left the US. Barnes should really check the Farms, much better research than what he can do.About LEGUL MINDSET
Huh, normally if you find jurisprudence you could reference it rather than pulling an "I'll show you! You'll See!"Coping and Sneeding about "Toxic Twitter" and LawTube:
Does anyone know a good run down of that lawsuit? I think it was about tweets so I'm not shocked it didn't go anywhere.About NateTheLawyer:
I recall him talking shit about Sandmann as well. Claimed the kid was smug and asking for it. Now that I see these tweets, I see why.He ended up representing some other kids, but not Nicholas Sandmann, but never bothers to clarify it when he talks about how he represented the "Covington kids".
He's has a picture of him and Snipes behind him for years, and also constantly brings up this case as anecdotal proof of something. Big Wow, he's exaggerating his part in it as well.Well where's our Big Shot Lawyer in the picture? Is he mentioned in the text?
The full site reveals that Barnes was only the side-kick to Robert Bernhoft, so much so that in the only video with him in it, he looks more like a bodyguard than anything else.
He has zero principles.How many times has Barnes spoken about the need for courts to be more transparent? Now, when people are actively pursuing transparency in a case he's on the other side of all his previous stances go to nought.