Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.2%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 134 38.7%

  • Total voters
    346
1000003507.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nick trashes his first lawyers again, claiming they "didn't try", "didn't do any work" on his case and were "absolute garbage". Also he says he's currently pretty embroiled in the "legal theory" of his case.
Legal theory? So he’s definitely fighting it. No plea deal for Nick. This omnibus hearing is going to be pure kino.
 
If the cops somehow fucked him over we need to help him out. Maybe one of them is a friend of Aaron's who've got all the reason in the world to try and fuck with Rekieta.
We need the bodycam footage. There are extremely autistic people here able to go through it all and see if something's amiss. We need to help him, guys.
 
Is… is he fucking arguing that his 4th Amendment Rights were violated? For properly served search warrant? @AnOminous

Has AIDS rotted his brains? He has multiple people arguing that he was high in public?
He's arguing that the PC used to get the warrant was flawed. Therefore his brilliant strategy to not give the door code was brilliant.



And.... oh please oh please oh please2024-08-14 21_55_16-Search results _ Kiwi Farms — Mozilla Firefox.png
 
Nick trashes his first lawyers again, claiming they "didn't try", "didn't do any work" on his case and were "absolute garbage". Also he says he's currently pretty embroiled in the "legal theory" of his case.
Crackets: Your Honor (shut up, hack! I told you you're second chair!), our legal theory is Aaron left that coke behind and I had no idea what it was.
Judge: AnimeSucksCopeAndSneed for ten dollars says....
 
Nick trashes his first lawyers again, claiming they "didn't try", "didn't do any work" on his case and were "absolute garbage". Also he says he's currently pretty embroiled in the "legal theory" of his case.
Nick wants to be his own lawyer so he can control everything, with his actual lawyer serving as nothing but "the mouth of Balldo".
His original lawyers were well practiced in this type of law and didn't make stupid objections, like objecting to hearsay in a CPS hearing (which is allowed). Nick doesn't like his original lawyers because they embarrassed him and showed him up for what he was, a third rate non-practicing youtube lawyer.
 
Doesn't everyone give their swinging partners access to their master bedroom safe to store narcotics?

Easy mistake to make. Happens to the best of us.
:really:
Didn't you hear his example? His bathroom safe mechanic dropped cocaine in his safe and on his daughter.
 
Last edited:
Didn't you here his example? His bathroom safe mechanic dropped cocaine in his safe and on his daughter.
Someone in Sean’s server said he might argue that Aaron left the safe their or when April came to pick up stuff Aaron gave her a safe of Columbian Booger Sugar. That seems dumb enough for me to see him doing that along with the 4th Amendment argument.
 
Bob and Celeste really seem to be all-in on Nick being a dindu.
I really hope Bob and Celeste are not flying in and taking over. Considering how Nick turned out, he is probably their golden child who can do no wrong.
Based on my earlier speculation about Nick being a favorite child and his sister being a scapegoat, I hope Bob and Celeste do not currently have custody of the kids.
One of the things we don't have a clear read on is where Bob and Celeste are in all this.

You would think a grandparent wouldn't be happy their grandchild was exposed to all this crap, and tested positive for Cocaine, but it wouldn't be the first time rich parents fought like hell to keep their dipshit kid from facing any consequences for their actions.
Celeste's parents seemed like very decent people, but I haven't seen much evidence to suggest any of their moral values transferred to her and Bob. Indeed, I have my suspicions Nick wasn't raised right, and has never had to experience serious consequences for anything until now. He certainly acts like a man who never has.
Bob and Celeste raised an unrepentant narcissist. A likely scenario is that one of them is also a narcissist and the other an enabler.
Nick's parents are a big red flag to me as I just can't accept that they've been completely blind to what's been going on in that household. Even if they only speak with their grandchildren sparingly, there would have been a noticeable difference between how they were before the open degeneracy started and how they are now, both emotionally and physically.

Further, and I can't remember exactly when, but Nick's father went to visit him in Minnesota earlier this year at a time when his physical degradation was so obvious he'd gone full ghoulmaxing. Now if I rocked up to see my son and he looked like an obvious junkie, and my grandchildren looked like they were being abused/neglected you can be damn sure something would be done about it.

The fact we've heard nothing about either Bob or Celeste being on Nick's case, which I absolutely guarantee we would have if they were cause that faggot publicly castigates literally everyone that doesn't suck him off, just tells me they've been enabling this sick fuck right from the start.
I think his parents are 100% enablers. The type that would protect their baby boy no matter what. Balldo grew up being called special and being allowed to get away with basically everything, that's why he carried his self-diagnosed ODD from his early teenager years all the way to 42 years of age, ie now.
Something is off about Bob and Celeste.

They seem like the laid-back cool loaded doting grandparents, which would be awesome for the kids, but they also seem off to me somehow. I hope I'm wrong about that.
I seriously doubt Bob and Celeste have ever allowed Nick to experience the consequences of his own actions.
Imagine being a fully grown adult and being unable to have an adult conversation that doesn’t make you look like a manipulative sociopath, Nick’s parents likely fell for this charade countless times, mommy and daddy always ready to help their piece of shit kid out of messes he himself got into.
Quite often, with intergenerational trauma, abuse is repeated from parent to child, creating a cycle that mostly goes unbroken. ... I imagine Nick is carrying out behaivours that are present in his parents, which would explain why some of Kaylas family were some of the people to report their behaviour.
The problem with saying his personality disorder is his responsibility is as you pointed out. His parents failed him hard for him to get to this point as well.
I honestly don't believe they're that stupid. They know damn well their shitty son is a cokehead. They lied. The lying liar who lies that they raised learned it from his parents.
Nick definitely needs tard wrangling, but I’ve seen no evidence that his parents have ever been inclined to place any limits on their little boi.

Interesting new matter of public record attached. The state rests, and finally the defense gets to present their star witness to prove once and for all that Nick's a good boi who dindu nuffin. Yes, notwithstanding a prior transcript's expressed "concerns that both sets of grandparents were in the home the week before the removal," grandpa Bob is here to assure everyone that he has never ever "ever seen any unsafe parenting" by Nick, and indeed has "not seen him intoxicated" or "ever seen [Nick] to be under the influence of something." Indeed, he has never even so much as "witnessed any sort of subtle changes of personality in" Nick or Kayla "that gave rise to any sort of concern that something's wrong." So I guess that means he's never watched his son's show in the past year, if ever?

On the other hand, maybe there's just not much of a keen eye for those sorts of things, as he's apparently lived so sheltered an existence as to not "know what someone who uses drugs looks like" in the first place, such that he would need "YouTube videos" brushing up on what you or I might call basic common sense. But that Mr. Magoo routine seems less credible when considering his acknowledgment that he "saw cocaine in person" in his younger days, along with "what a joint looks like," and "a bong" or "needles" being the sorts of paraphernalia too look for, only to backtrack to how "a lot of this knowledge is pretty much from television as opposed to personal experience." Sure.

Signs of drug use aside, at least he had no choice but to acknowledge "messes" of "clothes in piles...waiting to be washed," which apparently was such a problem that when anyone would "stay at [Bob's] house for a couple of days, [Bob] can see" the messiness proliferating from house to house like a virus spreading from host to host. That checks out. But don't worry, surely it will all be swept up by "April" whom he considers a mere replacement of "their old nanny Chaney," with no awareness of any other complexity to that relationship.

Looking to the future of a more supervisory role, Bob curiously thinks it's "one thing" if Nick and Kayla give a "reasonable answer" for drug paraphernalia being in plain view, and would only "press the issue" if the "answer is unreasonable." What would such a "reasonable answer" even be? Indeed, apparently the only scenario where he would "call child protection" about drug paraphernalia in plain view would be "if the kids were in danger," as though there's some non-dangerous scenario where he would not call it in. And child protection aside, he certainly doesn't "want to speculate on" whether or not he'd "call law enforcement if things got out of hand." Snitches get stiches, after all.

But don't worry yourselves, you pesky scandinavian incel prudes, because Bob assures you that he's "[o]ne hundred percent" certain that the "grandchildren would be safe under [his] watchful eye" and there is "no doubt in [his] mind that they are in absolutely no danger" when in Nick and Kayla's care. Yep, there is "complete confidence in their ability to take care of their kids" despite all that we've seen. And in any event, "reunification is utmost priority" whereas "a healthy, good environment" is "right under that priority." First things first.

How about a show of hands: if and when the time comes for Bob to bear witness to a relapse, who thinks he will immediately do the right thing and report it to the county? And who thinks he'd be just as likely to give Nick a high-five?

Theme song for this table-read: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCW3Fcfidoc

 

Attachments

Last edited:
Its a constructive possession case. It doesn't matter whose drugs they were or even how they got there. What matters is knowledge of the drugs and being able to exercise control over them. Given that the drugs were in his bedroom and were in the locations they were in, there is no room for him to argue anything. So trying to blame Aaron or say that the drugs in his own bedroom didn't belong to him isn't going to work at all.

He has no grounds for going after the warrant than I can see. He can try a longshot appeal to constitutional rights, but selling an argument like that to a judge like that is going to be near impossible.
 
Back