The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

There are people in this very thread promoting civil nationalism. "Based sikhs can integrate" levels of cope.

I don't really have an issue with individuals that have historically served the Empire. Gurkhas for example. I don't want an ethno-state per se, because I don't think those really work, but we need to dramatically cut down on the number of foreign influences and start shipping the undesirables out. I think it is very British to honour those that have served our causes, with restrictions and expectations.

In my experience I've never had an issue with Sikhs; they are often some of the nicest people to work with and they overall don't impose much. Unlike Muslims, they don't close off their culture or add some weird propaganda element. With that said, I am in Scotland so there are way less of them. I'd probably have a different attitude if I were in England.

In traditional British fashion, I honestly think at this point we should just invade the North and coastlines of France since the French authorities can't seem to manage the situation.
 
I don't really have an issue with individuals that have historically served the Empire. Gurkhas for example. I don't want an ethno-state per se, because I don't think those really work, but we need to dramatically cut down on the number of foreign influences and start shipping the undesirables out. I think it is very British to honour those that have served our causes, with restrictions and expectations.

In my experience I've never had an issue with Sikhs; they are often some of the nicest people to work with and they overall don't impose much. Unlike Muslims, they don't close off their culture or add some weird propaganda element. With that said, I am in Scotland so there are way less of them. I'd probably have a different attitude if I were in England.

In traditional British fashion, I honestly think at this point we should just invade the North and coastlines of France since the French authorities can't seem to manage the situation.
So you're also promoting civic nationalism.

Muh based sikh is also part of the government propaganda. They want you to think diversity is good in some way so it can continue to creep when the only valid option is "fuck off we're full and this lot are leaving now". As I keep repeating you cannot allow rival ethnic groups in your territory. Even if based sikh man runs the best corner shop in the country you can't control his children or his children's children and they're all taking resources away from our children.

The empire is dead, our country is in ruins. It sucks for the people who helped us to completely destroy ourselves but we have to focus on ourselves now. We can help them as much as we have spare in their home lands but our priority is to us and ours. I don't have to hate any one to see my people are bleeding out and have a very short amount of time to fix it.
 
So you're also promoting civic nationalism.

Muh based sikh is also part of the government propaganda. They want you to think diversity is good in some way so it can continue to creep when the only valid option is "fuck off we're full and this lot are leaving now". As I keep repeating you cannot allow rival ethnic groups in your territory. Even if based sikh man runs the best corner shop in the country you can't control his children or his children's children and they're all taking resources away from our children.

The empire is dead, our country is in ruins. It sucks for the people who helped us to completely destroy ourselves but we have to focus on ourselves now. We can help them as much as we have spare in their home lands but our priority is to us and ours. I don't have to hate any one to see my people are bleeding out and have a very short amount of time to fix it.

I think there's a difference between someone that's been here for 80 years versus 80 days. I don't think an ethno-state would ever be possible now. Unfortunately.

I believe in a state that only recognizes native Brits as the owners of the land, and the leaders of it. In which Churches are the only recognized religious institutions. I don't believe in absolutes, and realistically a total racial cleansing is never going to happen or work. It's better to remove those that are the worst offenders, and thren slowly work down the line.

Civic Nationalism implies I support foreign influence and non-British leadership; I don't. I think God blessed these lands with a bounty of resources and a population that has punched far above its weight in every possible aspect of success from Military to science and Industry.

We owe the world nothing -- but I do believe part of being British is being honourable enough to at least accept those that served us actively. I would, however, wipe out the enlistment-to-citizenship pipeline. I have actively seen posts in which people advertise joining the British Army as an easy way to get citizenship and those people should be removed from the military and sent back.
 
I will lead this post with a disclaimer for all Kiwis: DO NOT DO ANYTHING STUPID.
read up on Philip Luty, a man who died in 2011 of cancer while fighting Britain's gun laws. Find and download his homemade firearm blueprints
He posted on the Internet not realising that said books are treated as having a legit firearm without a license.
 
He posted on the Internet not realising that said books are treated as having a legit firearm without a license.

Is that for real or hyperbole? It's hard to tell in this hellscape of an Island
 
Is that for real or hyperbole? It's hard to tell in this hellscape of an Island
Yeah, you're looking at a terrorism charge solely cause of how vague the definition for it is.
Section 2 of the Terrorism Act 2006
Prohibits the dissemination of a publication which is either (a) likely to be understood as directly or indirectly encouraging terrorism, or (b) includes information which is likely to be understood as being useful in the commission or preparation of an act of terrorism. The maximum penalty is seven years' imprisonment.
If you have a manuel on how to make a firearm what do you think they'll make of it?
 
Yeah, you're looking at a terrorism charge solely cause of how vague the definition for it is.
Section 2 of the Terrorism Act 2006

If you have a manuel on how to make a firearm what do you think they'll make of it?

That's retarded. Not your post but that such a thing can exist. I have manuals on how to construct nuclear reactors and jet engines. It doesn't mean I'd be planning to fly a nuclear powered jetliner in to big Ben.

Sometimes people just have an interest in how things are made.
 
'immgrunts are rooining this cuntry!!!!' I shout, looted vapes tumbling from the pockets of my sports direct tracky bottoms as I prepare to chuck a brick thru the window of a Job Center+.

Everyone involved in the protests is an unemployed retard. A friend invited me to go to the counter protest, but I actually have a job and thus no time to stand around in the town center surrounded by 5000 coppers, trading insults with a pack of 8 coked up flagshaggers.

Kids these days don't remember the crackdown after the 2011 riots. The courts were running nonstop. Going out to rob a greggs because Tommy 'I love coke' Robinson told you to is already fucking stupid, but failing to cover your face and tattoos should be grounds for institutionalisation as you are clearly too mentally challenged for independant life.

I agree that this country is becoming shittier, but I don't think immigration is the root cause. The population is getting fatter and stupider and older, the government is getting greedier, there's drugs everywhere, no one wants to do anything for anyone else.
 
I agree that this country is becoming shittier, but I don't think immigration is the root cause.
It's not the root cause, but it is the most visible sign and the most obvious tool of social destruction. It's the outcome of extreme short-term thinking that has dominated politics since the 1950s. Not enough tax money? Import freshly printed tax payers! People don't want to work for shit wages and conditions? Import third worlders who will be happy to live ten to a hovel and earn tuppence a week!
 
From a strategic angle, the whole point of the government going as hard as possible on speech offenses is the online equivalent of the US's Shock and Awe doctrine - basically hitting with such audacity and overwhelming force that the idea is that it breaks the will to resist basically immediately. That's also the central reason behind the UK Police Commissioner loudly declaring that he's going to extradite shitposting Americans - he's never going to actually get that, and any local government who went along with it would be immediately facing the prospect of their own constituents going hot. The point is to try to kick the face in of the remaining indigenous rebels by implying that no help will be coming.

The problem, of course, is that not only are Americans in general daring him to fuck around and find out rather publicly (as well they should), but we're a little bit past that point if people are willing to plead guilty to drive home how broken the fucking system is. The entire situation for the UK police is utterly unsalvageable. Whether or not the riots and protests continue, at this point, is irrelevant - they have already laid bare their fucking intent before the world. They will not go for the actual problems, they will continue to selectively enforce and by proxy, drive home that they see their own fucking citizens as a fucking enemy.

Good luck trying to maintain public order when people know your entire mandate is a fucking sham. Good luck trying to appeal to sense of decency when you've made clear you will reward that with your own cowardice. It's the sort of short-sighted idiocy that will drive people into far darker places than any accelerationist's rhetoric, and they will only have themselves to blame - tragedy of course being that they will go to the grave believing they did nothing wrong.
 
I think there's a difference between someone that's been here for 80 years versus 80 days. I don't think an ethno-state would ever be possible now. Unfortunately.
Not with cucks like you crying for civic nationalism. Any ethnic group is competition and will grow to want more space and more resources. It's how nature works and you cannot do it. If you accept anything but total nigger death your kids will face the same problems.
 
Stupidity is subjective. Some people think it's stupid to defy the government or offend violent third worlders. Others think it's stupid that you refuse to be violent as your own government destroys your culture and turns you into tax slaves to financially support the invaders.

It will all be good though. Everybody is going to vote the baddies out next cycle and they will be replaced with good hearted Englishmen that care about their own culture. I mean, the thousands of nationalists in prison for speech crimes won't be voting. There's also that protest planned for October, right? That should really bring about change. Starmer and the Moorish hordes are shaking in their boots.

I look forward to teaching my grandchildren about their family history. I'll probably hear something like, "But Grandpa! That's where the brown people live! Where did we really come from?"
That was one of the most batshit things about this to me as an outsider. Hearing Sargon's take on it end up with,
"We'll surely fix this in 2029."
Come fucking on.
 
They will not go for the actual problems, they will continue to selectively enforce and by proxy, drive home that they see their own fucking citizens as a fucking enemy.

Good luck trying to maintain public order when people know your entire mandate is a fucking sham. Good luck trying to appeal to sense of decency when you've made clear you will reward that with your own cowardice. It's the sort of short-sighted idiocy that will drive people into far darker places than any accelerationist's rhetoric, and they will only have themselves to blame - tragedy of course being that they will go to the grave believing they did nothing wrong.
Britain is on track to becoming a Middle East sort of country where there is a narrow uber elite population on top, a caste of police and Pakis to show people who's boss and the proles as barely human masses.
 
Not to be a loony leftie, but the allowances they get is basic as it possibly could be.
Less than 50 squids a week will pay for three meals a day most days, if you shop at the dirt cheap grocery stores. Possibly it will go further if you have access to some half decent cookware and buy raw ingredients rather than prepared foods, but the places they will be staying will rarely be well equipped.

It’s basically enough to stop you starving and maybe wash your clothes, but that’s that.

It isn’t indefinite either. When they say that you get it even if you have been refused asylum, that doesn’t mean you can go on living in the Uk.

It means that is what they will give you until they deport you or you convince someone to sponsor you.

I understand of course, the anger when the locals see people living in hotels and lounging around, but that is the situation until the government decides to do something drastic like actual detention camps or segregated areas of specified towns.
Okay I’m unlurking to ask more about this because it's been confusing me. Why are they coming when what they get is so basic? They don't get enough to send money home. Even more so in Ireland, where they get Direct Provision, which is hostel accommodation, meals provided, and a tiny allowance to cover toiletries etc. And lots of them aren't even getting that but are living in tents on the street. If they're fleeing genuine persecution, it makes sense that even living in a tent city is better. But I think that is a minority of cases.

They spend years in crappy conditions getting very minimal gibs and yet it doesn't discourage them.

Is family reunification the carrot that's luring them? It makes more sense that they go through all this shit if the prize at the end is citizenship not just for them but for their whole family. Would they stop coming if they weren't allowed to be anchors for their wives, children and second cousins?
 
Back