Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
I'm from the "Midwest" and know not to wear LEGGINGS to court! I also know what to wear to a 10k event... they're just trash...
You’d think people from the Midwest would know to wear their Sunday best to court.
but maybe it’s because I’m from the south and am attributing those values to people in the Midwest.
 
It feels very Midwest to me -- it's where she's from. A 'nice' dress is from the mall or an outlet there. Nothing wrong with it, just how life is there.

It's a little endearing in its naivety.
Buddy, no, no. As someone from a backwater, just no. You'd get a little black dress, or something with a similar profile. She's giving streetwalker; it's trashy. If she had friends, they would have talked her out of it. She's mutton dressed as lamb; it's bad. This is something for a young lady, not a 30-year-old woman. You don't wear a prom dress to a benefit dinner. You don't do it.

If they get married, I cannot WAIT to see whatever wedding dress she picks out. It's going to be an ORGANZA EXTRAVAGANZA. The gypsie child brides will not be able to compare to this bitch and it's going to be amazing. I hope she glues little mirrors to it. Please god, please. Please let there be mirror, rhinestone, or glitter elements on the primary partner upgrade ceremony dress. We've earned it.
 

Jesus, Juju is really starting to look like the love child of:

David Crosby
DNqUX8fWAAA2Tfe.jpg


And a pumpkin
Pumpkin-Big-Moon.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is this theoretical offense state or federal since it was online and ralph is ostensibly from out of state?
State. Theoretically, if he did it while physically in Wisconsin, both Wisconsin and the feds have jurisdiction in addition to Minnesota. And also theoretically, just using the Internet could confer federal jurisdiction, but Wisconsin couldn't care less, the feds are not going to interfere in a state case with no federal implications, and Minnesota is the only jurisdiction with any actual interest in it.

So either Minnesota will pursue it or, more likely, nobody. Conceivably, since they appear to be at least doing a due diligence investigation, that might turn up something that makes it a case, but I wouldn't bet on it.
However, if his Plan A does fail, it might be wise to avoid being overly antagonistic with someone you might want to cooperate with in the future.
Especially when antagonizing them serves no actual purpose but catering to absolute mental midgets on the Internet without benefiting the case in the least. But we all know Balldo's fucked cokehead priorities.
I still think Aaron is a shitty witness. He looks/sounds like he has an axe to grind and has a bad history.
It's a drug case. They use far shittier people every day. There are very few saints who are passive witnesses to Nick level degeneracy and depravity.
When you Google “Robert Lord” you get shit about Gambit from the X-Men. If “the Robert Lord Trust” is indeed a paper company whose name was meaningless and chosen solely to be obfuscatory nonsense, do we think Nick did something this faggoty and lame on purpose?
I'm pretty sure it's just Robert because that's Nick's middle name and Lord because he's a faggot.
 
Off April and Nick went, to an exclusive event with the artist that Kayla paid to make a painting for her husband.

That’s gotta cut deep.

Kayla probably drifted off into the comforting embrace of Captain Kirk and Lorazepam extra hard that night.
See, I don't think Kayla loves Nick, I think they are mutually codependent in more fucked up ways than we can imagine, but she was the one who had an emotional affair with a guy from her Star Trek game, then was "in love" with Aaron. I think there was also someone from her community theatre?
And I believe Aaron's stories about Kayla fantasizing about divorce. I also don't think she has any pride or self respect left. So why would she even mind April? At least she can stop worrying about her disastrous marriage and doesn't have to take the balldo anymore. She seems like the kind of person who finds relief in the ultimate failure. It's game over for her so now she doesn't even have to try. She'll just wait for death, pilled out of her mind.


It feels very Midwest to me -- it's where she's from. A 'nice' dress is from the mall or an outlet there. Nothing wrong with it, just how life is there.

It's a little endearing in its naivety.
Someone found this dress, it's $800.

I'm pretty sure that dress is Kayla's. They share clothes like they're sisters.

April wouldn't be able to afford it anyway since she is unemployed.
April fucks Nick for a living. But I think it's Kayla's too.
 
Nick is clearly pulling from his wealth of experience as a stay at home lawyer, thinking back to watching the Rittenhouse trial and certain media not being allowed to be shown because pinch to zoom adds pixels. The alcohol, cocaine and desperation have warped this rare legal experience into being applied to his case haphazardly.
Nigga thinks he's F Lee Bailey.
 
I dont know why people keep giving her the benefit of doubt..
It’s likely because most of the information about Kayla is secondhand info, at the most. Things that are “known” about her are (90% of the time,) coming from Nick, Aaron, or someone else. She’s made a few direct statements over the years. This keeps that benefit of the doubt alive. Even if a subconscious thing, in the back of many people’s minds, most of what is known about Kayla didn’t come from direct observations of her, as they did with Nick. That’ll keep many people second guessing their ideas about her.
She's lost all presumption of a benefit of the doubt. If she gets rid of the rage twig, protects her kids, or even just tard wrangles him into some degree of sanity, then maybe she gets it back. For now, she's on the same level of Hell as he is.
That’s where I’m at with it, too. Every moment she stays, I lose any shred of sympathy or benefit of the doubt for her. It’s all on the table & she’s still licking it up. Fuckin’ get some self respect & leave that coomer druggie skelly in the dust, or forever hold your peace as a third wheel in your own marriage who, like Nick, only cares about the image of being a parent & not actually behaving as one.

I keep wondering in the back of my mind if Nick’s parents have made any recent, large, donations to any businesses, organizations, or individuals in Kandiyohi County, & the surrounding ‘burbs. If things magically go Nicks way, I’ll be wondering even more. Nicks arguments are so extraordinarily retarded that there is no way they’ll sway anyone that wasn’t bought by his mommy via the family money.
 
You’d think people from the Midwest would know to wear their Sunday best to court.
but maybe it’s because I’m from the south and am attributing those values to people in the Midwest.
A lot of people from the Midwest are what I call "Yosemite Sams". It's a sort of crude imitation of rural life. The kind of person who thinks growing dope in their single wide makes them a farmer.
 
parading April around like a side piece
"Like" a side piece? She is a side piece.

Just because they drop the issue doesn't mean the prosecution won't. Nick's trial (IF) is going to be a fireworks show. All the more for getting it televised.
What do you mean - the prosecutor won't drop what? They have the application/ warrant; it's up to the defense to challenge it. I'm just saying any argument that watching a restream/recording is inherently materially different to watching the original live stream is a loser and if it gets past challenge based on alleged misrepresentation, there's no argument to be made.

There are different stages/levels of the process. Rn, he's trying to get the warrant tossed because THE COP IS A LIAR, primarily - he didn't specify where he found a recording of the stream and couldn't have watched the original "my stream" bc Nick hid it, and the cop deliberately omitted this information from the application in order to lie to the Court.

Second argument would be it wasn't "the original" and therefore is not a reliable source of info (bc compression TOTALLY changes what's onscreen (apparently to the point of adding in people and whole hours of acting like a drug-addled monkey)), so should be excluded from assessment of whether there was legitimate probable cause. That's all wet bc then you're into, well, did it show an obviously drug-influenced person? Answer is yes, and cop has the training to support his statements that in his professional judgment it does. Remember the warrant wasn't based (or at least not solely, idr) on "I spied cocaine on/under his nose," but rather his whole behavior - so there's no pixel-bitching that should need to happen (no doubt it will).

But if the above is determined to be a misrepresentation, the question becomes - was it material? Was what was represented materially different to reality? So - is the recording reviewed materially different to the original to the point that it changes any assessment based on it? Answer is no, and that's the point I think they'll (or should bc it's a complete loser and waste of time - oh, right, so they probably will insist on it) drop. Bc whatever he watched clearly shows Nick behaving like a drug-addled nut. Even if it were a chopped-up clip version (and at 4+ hours I don't think it is), if it showed Nick as he was in that stream, it's not a material misrepresentation of how he was in that stream and therefore any failure to note specific source is immaterial, warrant upheld. And as we know, there is nothing in that stream or it's various recorded renditions that shows anything but a coked-up drunk.

If it gets to trial, the stream is potentially relevant for a constructive possession finding. Bc Nick was not in the house at the time the cops entered, there's a speedbump to prove his dominion and control over the drugs. For (for Nick's case): he stated it was his/Kayla's bedroom; drugs were found in a safe (or 2?) - query who had access to the safe (if just Nick and/or Kayla, and coke was found there, that's good evidence of dominion/control). Against (for Nick's case): April's cards, April's presence at the time of the search, Nick not home.

They would be tried separately, so each person's charge would have to be argued irrespective of what happens in the other cases; you could have a scenario where april's presence was determined enough of a wild card to undermine the Rekietas' constructive possession, even if April is only charged for a small amount. I'm guessing they gave April the lower charge based on the amount actually on her cards/in/on her purse? Idk. You could also have a scenario where kayla's presence in the home at the time of the search, her bedroom, access to the safe (maybe?) proves constructive possession, but Nick's absence at the time of the warrant undermines his.

(Tbh, it's very interesting that - peanut gallery aside - nick is getting lawyers, etc., as though he's the main show, when it's Kayla who potentially has more vulnerability for constructive possession. Very telling.)

But so, the stream could help support Nick's constructive possession to the extent it shows coke on Nick's person or shows a person people can reasonably believe is on it in his home. So you might look at this stream (recording - it's going to be a recording regardless). And with the best available recording offered as evidence (not necessarily what the cop watched) it will be on nick to prove it is of such dubious reliability (bc compression, lol, etc.) that no jury or judge should see it. Same for the neglect/endangerment charges.

- sorry if that's jambled, it's quick back of the envelope musings on phone, and I don't have the standard at hand for tossing a warrant based on misrepresentations, so didn't tie my comments tightly to them.

Kayla probably drifted off into the comforting embrace of Captain Kirk and Lorazepam extra hard that night.
I'd put money on it. Nick has this set up concubine-style now, so he rotates at his leisure, and no doubt on April's nights, Kayla is zonked tf out. I guess on Kayla's nights April gets an extra rail and permission to drain a (cheap) whiskey bottle, crying alone in the murder shower in the second house.
 
What emotions were these coke heads trying to convey?
Sleazy Greazy & Skeezy both look like it stings as much as it stinks. Gape Ape in particular has a look of “that’s right my nigga, no condoms. All my eggs come pickled with a side of HPV”.
IMG_9773.jpeg
(Her actual tramp stamp)
 
Last edited:
He's so stunningly and bravely fighting for OUR FREEDOM even if we can't appreciate it.
ok but nigga what? is he actually claiming the fact the states gets some time to investigate the claims he made in his motion to get the warrant thrown out is le bad?

He's gonna take such a massive L and spin it into some sort of "authoritarian gov oppressed me hear my story!" type deal when this is all over, isn't he?
 
Back