US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
It's not even useful then. None of it's official. They'd still have to be nominated and confirmed. It exists only as a seething cope for the democrats and a desperate attempt to blunt the country throwing them out into the political wilderness en mass.

So every time Trump does anything for the next 4 years, these "shadow cabinet" types can run around going "I'm the AKSHUAL cabinet position in exile, and here's why you should be upset / vote against doing it / impeach him for it." Both in the ears of their faggy cohorts in congress and in the media to the American people.

"Jewy McJewstein, SHADOW ATTORNEY GENERAL, up next on MSNPC, to tell you why Trump can't actually do the thing he's doing because he's only TECHNICALLY the president."

To expand, because I asked around a bit. The idea being pushed is that Harris only lost because she failed to expound on the policy and really tell people she had them. This is cope but.... not entirely wrong. I would say it misses the forest for the trees in not realizing that Harris never mentioned policy largely because the internal schisms of the party means no policy is acceptable. Still, understanding this idea make sit easy to understand that the idea of this "Shadow Cabinet" is to take whatever cabinet members of Trump's administration do and to present to the public on the news circuit the "Democrat Alternative" to Republicans. Think less "No they cannot" and more "This is what we would do instead.

Again, I am fine with this... in theory. But what the Democrat's expect from this and the realty are going to be two separate things. First, I expect it to be torn apart from inside as soon as a policy decision comes up that has any sort of internal disagreement. Second, its lack of actual power will leave many involved hungry for more and this would more or less shut it down as soon as someone tries. Third, one of the offshoot hopes is that this helps springboard some new blood into the ranks and give them prominence... which is absolutely going to fail. And Fourth and Final is that this is a minority pushing it rather vocally and it has a lot of pushback for the above reasons.
So basically it exists to make them look like fools. The donor class is already pissed at giving so much money on something they promised to be a sure thing. They donated to the Biden - Harris campaign so when he dropped out last minute they wanted someone other then Harris in charge, only to be ignored because the Democrats didn't want to pay them back. Then they were effectively coerced into paying a lot more for the Harris campaign because they were repeatedly assured it was a close race only for it to not be. This shadow cabinet has no clear income support so they will have to be relying on donations - donations that will be drying up as they pissed off the money.

And they have two choices to proceed. The first is to bitch and moan about everything Trump does, which is already getting old and people are tuning out. The other is to have defined and concrete policy plans and law drafts that they claim is better then the elected administrations, but that will fail due to infighting and it turning out that nobody agrees with anything they come out.

I expect that almost everybody that joins this shadow cabinet may find themselves blackballed by the people and will never be elected to another position except in the bluest counties.
 
Still, understanding this idea make sit easy to understand that the idea of this "Shadow Cabinet" is to take whatever cabinet members of Trump's administration do and to present to the public on the news circuit the "Democrat Alternative" to Republicans. Think less "No they cannot" and more "This is what we would do instead.
Basically, certain members of the Dem delegation will be the Designated Whiner for specific subjects and get a nice little extra bit of flair on the chyron when they're on a CNN panel or Meet the Press.
 
There is a lot of internal BS about how they only lost because they "failed to get out their message" as a pure example of true cope. This seems to me to be a lazy reuse of the term "Shadow Cabinet" to mean almost none of what it actually means as a shorthand for "Group that espouses our side of the aisle". it is doomed to fail and terribly thought out, but not actually malicious.
Actually, come to think of it, this would match up with the feelings occasionally expressed when I was still in the DailyKOS/et all bubble back in the day. In 2010, 2012, the stance was that the right only won in the midterms and what seats they did because a bunch of ignorant dirt farmers -- this was before "straight white male" became the de facto new devil of the progressive neo-left -- were tricked into voting against their own interests. This was blamed on a lot of things, including Fox News being allowed to speak, bigotry (racism or homophobia, mostly, as Trans people didn't exist as a political power back then) making them overrule their natural tendencies to vote left like all intelligent well meaning people, and a general failure of the left to communicate their obviously so superior ideas that no one could ever disagree with if they actually were properly understood.

This all occurred in a vague fog -- at no point were the concerns of right voters considered, they had no theory of mind of the right even then, and the idea of the right as a voting block existed in some ethereal "other place" that was vastly smaller than the left (obviously) and of no import. "Flyover country," for example. The consensus was that the right simply didn't know they already agreed with the left on everything, they were just tricked or stupid, and anyway this was a tiny part of the US that will die out soon and be replaced by brown people, who OBVIOUSLY will vote lefty like all brown people do.

Then about a year, maybe two later, GamerGate happened, and the cheap tin plating of respectability was scraped off the left on those sites and what was underneath was glossy black and squirming. I don't know if the radicalization was already inbound and this just made it very clear, or if being told to fuck off by one of their pet demographics -- young, tech savvy men -- helped cause it. Trump was 2 years after that, and, well. We all saw what happened then.

I imagine the right completely routing the left this year -- even taking away their vaunted "popular vote" cope -- is having a similar effect on them now. The comment sections over there must be absolutely insane when the mask slipping every so often.

With that in mind, them deciding they just need to message harder and surely then the rest of the country will understand why chopping little timmy's dick off because his kindergarten teacher thinks his soul is in the wrong body (and arresting his father for hate speech if he objects) is more important than the fact that food prices have doubled and no one can afford a house makes perfect sense.

They have learned nothing from 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016. I seriously doubt they'll learn anything from 2024.
 
Last edited:
There is a lot of internal BS about how they only lost because they "failed to get out their message" as a pure example of true cope. This seems to me to be a lazy reuse of the term "Shadow Cabinet" to mean almost none of what it actually means as a shorthand for "Group that espouses our side of the aisle". it is doomed to fail and terribly thought out, but not actually malicious.
so what is/was the Dems message anyway?
 
My timeline might be off, but I don't think the Simpsons existed back then.

The live action version of The Simpsons with Donald Sutherland was weird.



I want the based Nigerian nigger to be Surgeon General.
View attachment 6646841

To troll people and really piss them off keep pronouncing Nigeria as "Niggeria" and Nigerians as "Niggerians". When people get mad and try to correct you just say "Actually that's the proper pronunciation. It's pronounced with a soft, short "i" and a hard "g" in Niggeria."

I don't disagree with RFK jr being friendly with unholy shmuley, shmuley boteach is a dirty little rat bastard and is basically every single stereotype rolled into one. I personally think he was deeply involved in the oddness around Michael jackson's death. His power and influence is the only thing that has kept him from getting what him and his butt plug sellign whore daughter. That said, RFK jr is the perfect pick for HHS, I can't think of a better choice. Let him take a Flamethrower to Big Pharma, Big Ag/Big Sugar, and line out the vaccine schedule and the various health issues. Some of the vaccines are fine, some aren't. I don't see how his climate agenda (that trump has mentioned) will change his ability to do good work. BOBBY STAY AWAY FROM LIQUID GOLD BOBBY.. STAY AWAY FROM OUR LIQUID GOLD BOBBY!!!

The jewish stuff, and the gun stuff really seems like it wouldn't even come into play in HHS.

I think the Shmuley Boteach stuff was just Shmuley grifting for PR when RFK Jr had to bend the knee to jews after being called anti-semitic for saying that things were worse for people under the scamdemic policies in 2021 than for Anne Frank and for claiming that COVID-19 could be a bio-weapon and that ashkenazi jews (and the Chinese) were more immune it. Because I can't find any mention of RFK Jr and Shmuley together in the same article before then, searching using a selected date range from 1990 to 2023. (And, yes, I did use Robert Kennedy too, not just RFK Jr.)


MOSSAD.

View attachment 6647465


View attachment 6647467

They just can't help fucking around. It's not good enough to win (even though how they've "beat" Jones is the worst miscarrage of justice in modern history), they have to double-plus win.

So there was an "auction" but it was a secret auction, the judge refused to allow bids over a certain amount, and then gave it to the Onion even though it was less than the high bid because the high bid was one of Jones' allies, or somesuch. The Onion not actually having the cash isn't surprising (since they haven't had a funny article in at least 12 years) but I'm sure they could find an ally to give loan it to them.

The vibe I get is the Sandy Hook activists were working with the judge to hand pick the "winner" of the "auction" for maximum hurt they could cause Jones.

If he drags this shit out until January, I wonder if things could flip hard with the new admin coming into power.
I mean, all the secrecy, all the scheming...
It certainly seems consistent with someone that would have, you know, been knowingly complicit in allowing their kids to die in a shooting for their own gain?
More than the other suspicious shit about it, their actions in going after Alex harder than Adam really move that needle of likelihood for me. It leads me to where I genuinely think it's most likely that Alex was correct in what he said about Sandy Hook.

I hope he's eventually able to win an appeal. Maybe Trump can help him or something. How can they go after him for defamation when he was just saying that in his opinion he thought that some conspiracy theories about Sandy Hook (that had been going around for ages at the time, he certainly didn't create them), like the children not really being killed and the parents being crisis actors, were true? Especially when he changed his mind about it before he was sued. Have the parents talked about any of Gene Rosen's comments? Have they let any of their other children stay with him?




Also, we now know for a fact that it was the CIA that told the families to sue him so they could bring him down because a CIA officer (who I'm pretty sure is a literal faggot) was caught admitting it in an undercover sting which should have been international headline news in the MSM and brought the CIA down (not just because of this but other things admitted to in the full video, which isn't all about Alex Jones) if the MSM and US government weren't corrupt and controlled:

 
I heard Retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson talk about the Christian Nationalism in the U.S. military and what that might mean for the Constitution; high ranking officials who flop around on the ground and claim to speak in tongues. He noted Trump's propensity to exploit these types of people. He also claimed Israel is a strategic liability.
 

Pretty insane shit I'm hearing from this guy, he basically wants Europe to arm up, draft millions of people and throw them at Russia, saying that this WW3 he wants requires urgent mobilization RIGHT NAOW while simultaneously acknowledging that Russia has effectively neutered itself on Ukraine's bayonet and is very pathetically still struggling with it's impoverished neighbor. If Russia is doing so poorly, and he knows it, why the urgency to go and fight? Maybe Simon Whistler should consider joining the Ukrainian army if he wants war adventurism so badly.
How many channels is this guy fronting? How does he even have the time?
 
So, we'll never know the real number of deaths just like another "official" death count :cunningpepe:
Definitely not since once Biden was installed, CNN turned their death counter off.


Don't forget fen-phen!

A director for a show I was in the pit band for was a chubster. He took a bunch of fen phen to lose weight and it fucked up his heart bad. Guy was like 30 and the doctor told him he has the heart of a 60 year old. Fucked part is that he needs a heart transplant because of it but apparently he's not eligible because supposedly he "did it to himself" by taking fen phen and it's not a naturally occurring problem like a heart defect. Ain't that like the medical field - Write you a prescription for a fucked pill and then once it wrecks you, tell you that you did it to yourself.

Ephebophile, someone attracted to older teenagers

The meme is "he isn't a pedophile, he's an ephebophile!"
Isn't the joke - "What's a ephebophile? A pedophile with a dictionary."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back