I seem to recall he also tried to present himself as a master of social media and made himself open to consultations while criticising Heard's team. Kinda ironic considering he likes to walk around repeatedly shooting himself in the foot.
And he's so good at it that instead of his "Law Pope" branding that he desperately tried to make happen, now if you think of Nick (most people don't any more), they just think of a filthy semen-encrusted Balldo, the cringiest and most pathetic sex toy of all time, which if you use it proves you're an impotent, limp-dicked cuckold.
The foreclosure is on the Robert Lord Trust home, an asset held for the benefit of Nick and Kayla's children, as I recall. Nick and Kayla are the Trustees.
We don't know everything about that, but the "Robert Lord" trust isn't the main family trust, it's just (assumed) to exist to own that one property, and Nick and Kayla are the sole trustees. It's apparently a revocable trust, so it isn't subject to the immunities of an irrevocable trust that only exists for its beneficiaries.
There are other family trust(s) we know less about, although Nick has been and maybe still is a trustee on one of the family trusts, possibly as a way of giving him money for a do-nothing job.
More might come out if the foreclosure ends up becoming contested in court. Generally, you don't get to know much about trusts unless something turns into a lawsuit, and since generally only the beneficiaries would have standing to contest anything it does, what it does remains behind closed doors.
Imagine having to pay to have a fat homosexual pedophile as one of my two only friends... How is that gun looking, Nick?
He has other friends. He has Vito, another fat homosexual pedophile, Diddler Dax, another fat homosexual pedophile, and Ethan Ralph, another fat homosexual pedophile. Is it looking like a pattern?
The kids are minors. They have zero standing to sue their parents over financial decisions. Especially in what amounts to a gift.
Probably not about the Robert Lord trust, they're not really beneficiaries of that (that we know for a fact). There is at least one other trust they are probably beneficiaries of, and Nick has at least had a trustee position on that, so conceivably if he breached his fiduciary duties there (I assume there are other trustees so he might not even have been able to do that plus he would have been caught), they could sue as beneficiaries of the trust.
That's pretty speculative though. He'd have to have been in a position to do it, have actually done it, and then gotten caught either by the other trustees or (possibly) the guardian ad litem in the CPS case. I think he's too dumb to have done it and gotten away with it.
And as pointed out, it can be difficult to prove a breach of fiduciary duty. But something like embezzling the trust fund money and spending it all on cocaine would definitely qualify.