- Joined
- Apr 19, 2025
That is very interesting. Im pretty sure he had help getting those pictures taken. First photo it taken at an angle with the sun off view to the right. Looking at the shadows on photo 2 and 3 confirms the suns location and tells us they were taken sometime in the early/mid afternoon. 2 and 3 are more interesting because the harsh glare in the middle. This tells us the person was in a car and took photos through the window glass like this.It's worth noting that the device used to scan the first set of documents, a Ricoh IM C2500, is a model which was one of only 5 listed by the MN government for procurement for small offices as of a few years ago. Interesting coincidence.
It had a list price of over $17,000, so if it wasn't scanned in an office, it was likely in a library or some other public place. This isn't a device for personal use.


Both 2 and 3 were shot quickly one after the other with just a small change in angle. 4 is also a zoomed in and brightened image 3. I think one person was driving south while the passenger snapped each photo in order. They turned in their seat after picture one and quickly took 2 pictures to get the license plate good.
Maybe to erase meta data? There's easier ways to do it but if you're paranoid this is the safest way. It would be embarrassing to have you're name or any other clues leaked because of a mistake. The brightened picture 4 also makes me think this. They went through and digitally altered the image but still chose a lower quaility scan. Funny metadata analysis was a big part of the Depp trial. Maybe someone who watched Nicks coverage remembered that fact. Its possible but there's no telling.Go back to the original "public records" - they were also photos of a computer screen (with a mouse cursor visible on certain pages) which were then printed and scanned. Why the person behind the account did this, I have no idea.
Its an interesting little mystery.
Last edited: