US US Politics General 2 - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't forget that the Mega-Cities that were announced had their biggest location in Gaza. One question that was brought up was "How will you build a mega-city in Gaza?" I guess that question is sorted.
 
He's starting to sound like a Democrat.


Then when we find it's replacements and there's still no arrests and nothing done about it they'll keep saying this lie and cope. "Well we shouldn't be concerned with this pedophile island, we should be looking to shut these other ones down, arresting the people guilty on this island won't shut down the whole industry so what's the point?" And then this will eventually turn into "Ya know what? He actually did nothing wrong and he's totally innocent. Any wrongdoings you think he committed is just your imagination, silly goy."

It's all so tiresome
This shit isn't even because of the reasons you're saying. It is literally that the pedophiles have paid enough money to the right people to be inoculated. Epstein got sent to prison as a stay of execution for fucking up.
 
Oy Vey, Oy Vey
Anuddah Holocaust Today!
Grok got castrated
Hoo-ray, hoo-ray!

Oy Vey, Oy Vey
Da Shoah (yeah! whoa! hey!)
Trump is sweeping for Epstein
Oy Vey, Oy Vey

"Oy Vey, Goyim! Are you still, like, talking about Epstein? Wow, you're desecrating Texas by talking about Epstein. Next question."

TRUMP IS ACTING GUILTY! TRUMP IS ACTING GUILTY! TRUMP IS ACTING GUILTY!

IT'S ANUDDAH SHOAH IF YOU POINT OUT THAT ZION DON IS SWEEPING, JANNY-LIKE, AT THE MENTION OF EPSTEIN'S NAME!
 
Because they are Orthodox, Catholic or Oriental and the US Christian political power is Protestant. And of that a large amount are also left wing.
The Catholic church is the country's largest single church. It constitutes 23% of the US population. Protestant churches are a grab-bag of various denominations.
 
Also, friendly reminder that like 60 days after Epstein "died" a mysterious once in a century virus began to spread in Wuhan that shut the entire world down and everyone kind of forgot about Epstein in the mainstream until a few months ago.

People here might get this but in Sept 2019 the repo market, a significant financial backbone of the global economy, melted down in the middle of the night. We're talking levels of global depression you can't imagine. 2007 crash times 1000. Covid was announced within a week or so after.
 
160 people dead so far from the floods in Texas.

This considerable loss of life is going to be blamed on a multitude of people, but I think there's a force nobody wants to acknowledge, meteorologists. Already lawmakers are blaming failures of weather predictions. And the narrative is being shifted to the political, Doge, the cuts, etc.

While that may be the case, it be a mistake to take the scientists word for it. In many cases, these cuts aren't effective till next year. Many of these institutions have issues with over staffing. Much of the funding is very localized, and immune from federal cuts. And there's a clear problem with DEI, like all organizations right now.

But there has been a decades long insidious ideological decay in academia, especially in climate science. The climate hoax has created a class of meteorologists that are very ideologically radicalized to anyone on the right. Now they are never going to outright sharpen their picket signs. But they may sabotage, they may try to feign some type of academic neutrality with their credentials.

But there is the dark thought that they alone have the ability to sound the alarm for weather events. And some might look at a weather front going into an isolated christian community and think "Payback Time".
Like watching a plane on a radar screen collide into another for some form of sick revenge.
M-z1C0DdxJEDzVg0IbVteli7vlpNhx_ygNiW0OYaUFU_jpg.webp
 
Last edited:
But there has been a decades long insidious ideological decay in academia, especially in climate science. The climate hoax has created a class of meteorologists that are very ideologically radicalized to anyone on the right. Now they are never going to outright sharpen their picket signs. But they may sabotage, they may try to feign some type of academic neutrality with their credentials.
The Weather Channel is literally the scummiest, tabloid-tier, activist slop on American television and they do it proudly and with righteous fervor.

You are over the target.
 
“Hey, we’re going to have to announce this to the public in the next few hours, but let’s leak it on /pol/ first to confuse provenance.

The only thing missing is why they would need to confuse provenance.
If you can explain that motive, that theory might stop looking like the paranoid rantings of a defective mind.

Good question. It is a well known intelligence technique, with numerous examples from history and manuals. It's been used for a very long time, so it's hard to know where to even point you. It's classic af.

Even the Wikipedia page for COINTELPRO cites it, related to smearing and confusing provenance (obv). Planting false stories as a means to manipulate people is like legit standard operating procedure. There are many benefits to making it anon specifically (targets are unable to verify its authenticity, an air of insider knowledge, etc).

Many of the tactics used in COINTELPRO are alleged to have seen continued use, including discrediting targets through psychological warfare; smearing individuals and groups using forged documents and by planting false reports in the media;

Edit: adding one more quote related to anon documents during COINTELPRO.

Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used a myriad of "dirty tricks" to undermine movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents, and manipulated or strong-armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials, and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad-jacketing to create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with lethal consequences.[74]
 
pleh, one thing I forgot to add is that if they're criminals then they're autodeported and if they do some shit after they get citizenship then they're gone too
Coming here illegally is a crime. Therefore as soon as they arrive here they are criminals to be auto deported.

Apologies if I am restarting an old argument, rate me late if so.
 
It is a well known intelligence technique, with numerous examples from history and manuals. It's blah blah blah
The question remains: WHY would they need to ‘confuse the provenance’ in this specific case?
What possible benefit would be gained from confusing the provenance of information they were a couple of hours from releasing anyway?
 
Back