Varg Did Nothing Wrong
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2016
NO DARKIES!
The most logical and sane thing said on the subreddit so far tbh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NO DARKIES!
Gay dudes don't usually use terms like "polyamory" to justify it though, which is already more reasonable and honest.Absolutely. The gay male lifestyle is conducive to having multiple sexual partners. I remember taking sex ed freshman year of college, the professor said in a recent poll given to 30 somethings and the number of sexual partners they've had in their lifetimes, heterosexual men and woman would have an average of anywhere from 3-12 partners. Homosexual men had something like 60 lol.
So as a psychologist, I want to say something: polyamory is completely fine, in theory, given the basic definition the OP gave. However, this subreddit really is not anywhere close to that fucking ideal, and it's downright sad.
"completely fine in theory" "as a psychologist"
Nigga I gotta call BS on that one, our knowledge of how the brain works is far from complete and I don't think it shows polyamory is fine. Furthermore a statement like "polyamory is completely fine" just isn't meaningful or clear:
Do you mean to say, 'a polyamorous couple won't encounter problems?'
Obviously false.
Do you mean to say, 'polyamory is completely fine because a couple won't develop jealousy?
Again, this thread has shown that not to be true.
Do you mean to say, 'a polyamorous couple won't encounter problems if they have 'communication' and 'emotional maturity'?
This is such a frustrating opinion because 'emotional maturity' is ill defined. If polyamory causes all these problems in couples that thought they were stable, why doesn't that tell you this lifestyle and ideology are not OK?
Someone earlier compared polyamory to communism and I think that was very apt given past arguments I've had with Marxists. 'Real polyamory' and 'true communism' are two of a pair. If communism causes all this economic trouble in all these countries, why shouldn't we oppose it? If polyamory causes all this trouble in all these peoples lives why is it so unreasonable to see it as bad? I'm sorry if I come off as aggressive, I just feel strongly that these kinds of ideologies that force people to suffer are wrong.
Poly Husband leaves wife a couple of weeks before child is born.
http://archive.is/GzNQa
Poly Husband divorces Poly Wife after 10 years of marriage saying that it's needed for them to stay in a Polyamory relationship.
http://archive.is/jahfP
Wife leaves cause Hubby bought her a book that r/polyamory recommends for polyamory relationships
http://archive.is/znS5Q
College student tries to make it sound like her first time employer fired her cause of being Poly and not for having typos in letters she typed. She said was gonna spend the weekend with her girlfriend after saying that she had a boyfriend and a couple of weeks later they canned her for having typos.
http://archive.is/YhhyR
A "Unicorn" (AKA: Young hot single girl) was ditched by her Poly lovers and now has to raise two kids (is prego cause of the husband of her female lover) on her own.
http://archive.is/nSQu7
Do it faggot
This phrase pretty much summaries the emotional pain this shit brings"Why am I not enough for you"
Honey, I said a simple thing without much bulk to it with its writing. I get that it can be a good thing, but only if you seriously understand what the fuck love is, and that means defining "emotional maturity", a very subjective experience, and also defining what "communication" is, which is also a subjective thing in this. And in the end, you will also have to define what "love" is to you in order just to simply begin defining those last two concepts, and I believe that starts with the Self.
Comparing it to communism is apt in its comparison because it's "great idea, wrong species" concept: we want to help/love others in such an absolute way, but we don't know how. Communism was simply a concept of making sure EVERYONE got the shit they needed, but it fucked up completely because it, for one, wasn't executed correctly in principal; and second, because no one had a fucking clue what EVERYONE wanted and needed; likewise with Polyamory, it's this idea of trying to get both parties to get everything they both want, and fucking up completely because they don't even understand what they want/need. Both are decentralized, and have a false concept that people know themselves to a point that they can do this shit.
Communism was a grandiose idea of helping EVERYONE, both politically and physically, but that comes under the premise that you truly understand what is right for EVERYONE, and that means understanding what is right for Yourself.
Likewise, with love: if you truly don't understand and love yourself to an absolute point, it's going to be hard just to have monogamous relationships-- let alone something far grander than that. Emotional maturity would simply be described as understanding/"loving" yourself to a point that you get your own subjective, personal experience in relation to Others and their own subjective experience. Likewise, "communication" would be understanding yourself to a point that you can clearly say who and what you are and what you want to someone without a bunch of bullshit added onto it because you don't, well, KNOW what you want. Someone with high emotional maturity and communication has a strong concept of themselves, and therefore can execute it in the real world both by their emotional reactions, and the way they speak to others.
This is but my own viewpoint on this entire thing; it's completely complex and strange territory that is completely new for the modern age: we have only really be subjected to monogamous stuff, and things like this are completely out of left field. However, a lot of these stories I've read on this Reddit seem to be a bunch of irresponsible people who truly don't know themselves: they just like the idea of sex, and nothing more.
They don't know how to love.
And yet, what is love? If you can't even answer that question, you're probably not even ready for a monogamous relationship in my opinion, and a lot of these people strike me as that. I view love as enjoying and understanding yourself to a point that you can love others without your own shit getting in the way because, well, you've already dealt with WHO you are, in some sort of subjective sense. That's how I view it.
This phrase pretty much summaries the emotional pain this shit brings
"She is so angry and feels absurdly betrayed by me."
Bitch you told her that you wanted to fuck other people. Why so surprised?
Wife lets Hubby fuck other women cause had surgery for Stage 3 Bladder Cancer, End result is this
View attachment 305663
http://archive.is/dyWII
A thread about their "minor" STIs and wouldn't you be surprised, they all have Herpes.
http://archive.is/sBpKp
Maybe it's because I've only ever been with one guy but can someone enlighten me as to why they think fucking other people can save relationships? It makes less sense than thinking that a baby would.Most of the people I've known who were in or wanted a poly relationship (including the guy who suggested that we make our relationship poly) had some form of STI, mostly herpes.
Maybe it's because I've only ever been with one guy but can someone enlighten me as to why they think fucking other people can save relationships? It makes less sense than thinking that a baby would.
Maybe it's because I've only ever been with one guy but can someone enlighten me as to why they think fucking other people can save relationships? It makes less sense than thinking that a baby would.