- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
A thought:
I find it interesting that nobody has gone in really hard on Nick or Ty for reading Kiwifarms and availing themselves of our weaponized autism. I thought for sure that was gonna happen.
I know they said it on Nick's streams, and none of these people can be arsed to watch said streams, but I'm wondering if they're pulling their punches because @MarzGurl was here?
I find his dramatization amusing, TBH. I especially like how he divided Ren into stages of rage. He's also really good at collecting and collating info. He's doing what the site expects. Just let him.
I call back to my point earlier:
If using KF as a source is wrong, what justifies biased sources such as the talking heads of #KickVic, ANN, shill media, PULL and Lauren?
KF isn't even biased, from my observations of @Null 's coverage of Mad At The Internet Content.
So if the arguement is: "BUT THEY'RE BIASED!", maybe.
KF's just reporting the facts and showing people's own information and stance to be bullshit, because they're being hypocrites and actively obscuring information that condemns them.
PULL and #KickVic are actively trying to construct a narrative and documented lies, KF's just repeating the Play-by-Play recaps to and for the access of the public, and making the dramatization and additional secondary information entertaining to watch and recap.
In short, I'm literally doing my job.
Literally nothing wrong with making your news informative and entertaining, because it also can help give color commentary on Why This Matters™:
Frame of reference and context.
Someone a few dozen pages back liked the Kiwifarms autism to that of a sniper. And snipers know how to camouflage.
The less people know about this place the better. It'll be all the better when a metric asston of archives are dumped and people are all "wait who did this?"
Mainly because of this.
Put into context:
People have been told a man is a rapist and the public was primed and coaxed into the natural knee-jerk reaction to Unga-Bunga™.
Information from a aggregation site, media sites,and a forum from outside the Overton Window then blindsides the masses, showing how the movement was based on a lie.
Well timed information dumps given to the public through grass-roots means trends to the top of social media, "curing" the poisoned well everyone was drinking from.
A site tries to claim that the cure came from a problematic site
The targeted site reveals how the person who started the movement came to this site for fact-finding reasons for a previously successful media smear/truth revelation campaign and poses the question:
"If we were good enough to be a source then, how are we not to be trusted now? We have proof that you've been lying and suppressing information, attempting to slander and destroy us after using us for your own goals ensures your mutual destruction of yourself and the site you're using to entice and stoke the fires."
~~
If you were a normie, and were given all of the logs and information about #KickVic and #IStandWithVic including this archive we've amassed, who would you be inclined to believe?
(edited for formatting and spelling)
Last edited: