Standardized Profile
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2018
You can suffer an adverse reaction to water, sunlight, strong emotions, etc., so this idea of perfect safety is a non-starter. And there will always be people who have an adverse reaction to getting a needle stuck in their arm, so unless the vaccine is infused into chewables like Flintstone vitamins, we will have that level of risk, too. But we do know, to a fairly high degree of confidence, that the proposed vaccines do not cause dangerous adverse reactions at a higher rate than placebos, and we also know the adverse reactions they do cause (fatigue, soreness, etc.) are less severe than the adverse reaction to SARS-CoV-2 (weeks of illness, death).People not suffering adverse reactions t it.
I know there are some people who say it hasn't been tested enough yet, and I am curious what "enough" is. How many people--hundreds of thousands, millions? How long--five years, ten, twenty? Do you wait multiple generations to see if there are epigenetic effects? If you don't follow FDA and ACIP guidance, then what is the endpoint, specifically, at which you will decide a vaccine is safe enough for you?
I don't know, we vaccinate for lots of things with a mortality rate of less than 1%. Society in general does not hold to the idea that a mortality rate of less than 1% makes a disease insignificant, or that people who are elderly should be written off. Most people want their loved ones to live long, healthy lives, and hope that they too may live a long, healthy life.Though frankly why we need a vaccine for a illness that kills mostly the old and the fatties and has a mortality rate of less than 1% is beyond me.