Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I see you've never met progressive "Christians".

Ah, but have you heard the words of Woke Jesus?

1626641260376.png
1626641036712.png
1626641087015.png


I'd post woke Mohammad but I don't feel like dying right now.

I wonder if it's because these SJWs watched Pokemon and shonen anime as kids and concluded that a protagonist's job was to be the very best at something, ignoring the parts of the anime where the protagonist helped people or fought evil along the way.

Shifting gears, EmpLemon put out a new video about Nintendo and it's awful fanbase. I couldn't help but think this was a documentary about MovieBob himself:


But...everyone played Nintendo for an entire generation! Oh well. Am I a Nintendo fan if I have nostalgia but the only thing I know about Mario is he's a plumber who rescues a princess from a giant turtle?
 
That only works when you're not supposed to take the character that seriously, like Darkwing Duck.
Plus DW then usually got shat on constantly by the world until he would learn to stop with his ego and actually do his job (represented by his catch phrase).

If anything he was a great lesson for kids because he demonstrated that ego and self-importance was more of a hindrance than aid.

Also he was a devoted adoptive father.

I wonder if it's because these SJWs watched Pokemon and shonen anime as kids and concluded that a protagonist's job was to be the very best at something, ignoring the parts of the anime where the protagonist helped people or fought evil along the way.

Shifting gears, EmpLemon put out a new video about Nintendo and it's awful fanbase. I couldn't help but think this was a documentary about MovieBob himself:

Yeah I posted it earlier. Was shocked I never saw Bob in his Mario costume during it but EmpLemon apparently found more autistic people to include.
 
What I find odd is that Bob still insists that his side is made up of "Thinkers", that Christians are "Believers", and that "Believers" are inferior.
Unless said "Believers" practice Islam. Bob loves himself some Muslims.

A couple of weeks ago at Mass, my priest gave a homily about how simple it is to live a Christian life compared to sinning - for instance, it's a lot simpler to tell the truth rather than lie and have to constantly remember how you lied.
Which all goes back to Bob and his infamous tweets regarding how "racists and Nazis tainted eugenics" and how "Jim Crow ruined requiring IQ tests to vote". Whenever anyone calls Bob out on those statements, Bob will always claim that "they were jokes taken out of context". However, if one were to take a quick Twitter search combining "from:the_moviebob" with other search terms like "abortion" or "stupid vote", you could see that, yes, Bob still beleives in eugenics and Bob still believes only smart people should be allowed to vote. (Ironic because Moviebob)

In contrast, Bob's religion requires that you follow different and constantly changing precepts - the vaccine is bad unless Biden's president in which case it's good...
Moviebob, 2020.09.03, under Donald Trump: "I wouldn't take a COVID vaccine developed by the Trump administration if it was a topical solution that had to be applied hands-free by an all-star lineup of Miller Lite Girls. No thank you."

Moviebob, 2020.12.11, one month after Joe Biden is declared the winner of the 2020 election: "The vaccine is approved? Good. Get that shit in me yesterday."

...black lives matter unless those black people happen to vote Republican...
Or if said black lives also happen to have chosen to be police officers.

and you can't deny that Bob places his faith in the government and this idea of a superior future, as he does in this tweet where he defends the government having absolute power over people's communication and places his faith in the government being all-good.
That's because Moviebob can't think for himself, let alone think at all.

Even if we remove God's existence and the truth of either religion from the equation, if you gave me a choice between following the "simple" rules of Catholicism and the byzantine, ever-changing rules of liberalism, I'd take the Catholic Church any day.
I grew up in a semi-Christian household and went to Christian school, but backed away from Christianity about 25 years ago and I've been a non-religious agnostic since. Using Bob's own wording, I would much, MUCH rather live under a Christofascism than under a borderline Hitlerian or Sharian Moviebobocratic governance.
 
Last edited:
Exactly.

Today’s heroes lack motivation and conviction. All their reasons for being heroes is based on their deepest desires.

All they want is glory. They have to be the best. The smartest, the strongest, the cutest.

It why these consumers/SJWS like them so much.

I now see why SJW-driven works take so much inspiration from certain anime like Pokémon and Sailor Moon.
In the former, you saw a literal ten-year-old kid going around the world capturing critters, battling and whatnot. All with the simple motivation of being the best, like no one ever was. I think later on he and his travel buddies started getting entrenched in world-dominating/destroying conspiracies, but the original rarely touched that.

And in the latter, you saw a total loser of a girl suddenly become not only a tremendously powerful warrior, but also the literal Queen of the World, who marries the hottest guy around, gets powers to defeat her enemies at the most convenient time, and also cheats death not once, but twice. More, if you count the movies. All with literally weaponized love, because in case you forgot, it's a shoujo and Japanese girls love those frigging things, it seems. And the author even said a good portion of Usagi's ethos and happenings to her are her own power fantasies at play.

I think Dragon Ball Z also had a similar premise, but aimed at boys, natch. You saw an idiot savant who, possibly due to his Saiyan nature, has only two interests in his life, and those are fighting and becoming stronger, and then get excited for more fights, all at the expense of his family, close friends and the entire world, who are perfectly fine with his simpleton mannerisms. On the very least, you saw Goku and his buds train and bust their bones to achieve their powers, but still. I think there was a discussion about the consequences of Goku being a shit father and husband somewhere in this very thread.

Mind you, those aren't the rule, but are possibly the most popular in their target demographic, at least for Western audiences. I'm not one to bray about "bad examples" but I can't help but see the patterns.

But yeah, the point is that content creators have purely fantasy-fulfilling works as their references. You can't just have Captain Marvel as a woman who must overcome her ego to truly earn her place in the pantheon of heroes. Das sexist! She's perfect and powerful already, so she can do whatever she wants! Oh, a lesbian couple where one of the parts was nothing but an abusive jerk to her, and was more of a wrench to their plans than anything? Fuck that, LESBUNS! Therefore Catra will change her heart, declare her love for Adora in the nick of time, have her crimes forgiven and they live happily ever after! No questions, just consoom and live your fantasy.

Sorry for the long rant.
 
I'm not sure how the original space jam handled references compared to space junk 2 but I do know this: the reason people are hating on 2 is because the references literally serve no purpose. From the few clips that are coming out online the references themselves boil down to just playing a particular scene from a of whatever Ip WB owns rn completely straight just with a Looney Toons character stapled into said scene. Or just dumping a reference with no build up or real relevance to the story like the IQ expanding Richard and Mortimer just dropping Taz off, saying wubbba lubba dub dub and that's it. Even if it was the unholy crossbreed of MEMBER THE 80'S and consoomer bullshit, Ready player one at least made the references serve a bigger purpose for it's story, even if it's paper thin at best.
Also I hope your wife's cucking you behind your back and leaves you for a better man, Chris
 
Last edited:
Honestly, using power to fulfill your personal desires than as a responsibility to society to use your gifts to serve mankind seems a little selfish, tovarisch!
It is selfish.

Heroes are supposed to be honorable, responsible and selfless. It’s supposed to be about helping those less fortunate than you and bettering the world.

And if you use your power for personal gain, especially if you’re trying to hurt people, you’re not a hero, you’re a bad guy or girl.
That only works when you're not supposed to take the character that seriously, like Darkwing Duck.
Oh, definitely. I totally agree.

Darkwing is what I like to call a joke hero. A hero you’re not supposed to take seriously.
I wonder if it's because these SJWs watched Pokemon and shonen anime as kids and concluded that a protagonist's job was to be the very best at something, ignoring the parts of the anime where the protagonist helped people or fought evil along the way.
I would probably say so.

I’ve personally have met a lot of re.tarded sjws who focused more on the characters power and ‘speshul’ status rather than the premise or the characters personality.
 
I'm nowhere near as jaded as you are.

Happy endings? Sad endings? Bittersweet ones? They're all fine by me if they fit the tone of the story, tell a clear message and feel like a logical and satisfying conclusion to the events that preceded it. When Breaking Bad ended with Walter White succumbing to the symptoms of cancer as the DEA raided a drug compound full of dead bodies I don't get upset about how unfair it is, because the story had been building up to that exact moment for six seasons. When Doctor Faustus ends with the main character lamenting his literal deal with the devil before being torn asunder by demons I don't complain that it's a bad ending because it isn't happy, it's a cautionary tale about what happens when you sell your soul to the devil.

But if a corny, Marvel-style popcorn action sci-fi franchise with Mass Effect ends with a grueling funeral march that turns the whole universe into a bloated corpse, that's a hard left turn and the exact opposite of everything someone would enjoy about it. The same goes for sad stories, of course. If Doctor Faustus ended with the main character beating the devil in a sword fight and becoming the new king of hell as he headbangs to rock music I would think whoever directed the production fucking sodomized it. Bob would eat that shit up, though.
This. Make the ending match the tone of the media. Not everything needs a happy ending, but conversely not everything needed to be grimdark either.
 
You make a good point, but I'm not entirely convinced those phrases will even cross his tiny little mind. Maybe he'll Google it and get the phrases and confuse a Motu Proprio with the Traditionalis Custodes and at that point I will accede to your superior prediction skills when it comes to observing the Filmrob, but as I said, considering he's a Catholic so lapsed he's a fedora-tipping Atheist I doubt he'd find those words unless he stumbled upon them (which I concede is highly possible).

As a side note, I'm sorry the Pope did that to you Trad folks. I don't always agree with you all, but your practices were still Catholicism, no matter what anyone else says.
Its weird too. The Catholic church never has disagreements about they should conduct worship. I hope they'll survive.

Unrelated note I have a lot of replies, because I started reading this book on Thirty Years War. Skipped the first chapter however, those are usually so boring.
>Cuties isn’t CP
There’s literally a scene where a girl flashes her underage titty.
Shit man really? You should post a screenshot on Twitter saying "This is the Future Moviebob believes in"
Bobby's Angels. American gender roles was a reaction against the trauma of WWII:
E6f0vv5XIAA2Uut.jpg
Untitled.png
(The whole spiel by "Dr. Samantha". BTW his LinkdeIn shows no work experience after his graduation -- PhD in Philosophy -- in 2015)

Disney writers know all about gender roles and WWII, that's how they created WandaVision and Loki:
Untitled.png
Its weird that for something to have not existed, that it also came about as a return to normalcy.

As if, and keep in mind I am only a historian, not a verified Twitter user, but its like that exact aesthetic is only from that time, but the ideals and traditions have been long upheld for centuries.

Like fucking hell, thats how prohibition and women voting caught on. Because, you had turn of the century women leaving their homes and not upholding their societally expected roles. Which in turn caught attention, because,once again, this isnt how women were expected to act. Like its astounding how I don't even have to dig for this. Just first thing that occurred to me.

I'm not sure how the original space jam handled references compared to space junk 2 but I do know this: the reason people are hating on 2 is because the references literally serve no purpose.
I dont really remember a whole lot of references in the first Space Jam. Its been a few years, but I did see that movie 83 trillion times as a child. And it certainly didnt do what this one did where it just kinda smash cuts to other movies but with Looney Tunes.

That said it had a lot of sight gags based on you knowing things, like Looney Tunes or current events. Like I did rewatch it 6 or so years ago and thinking "Oh I get that joke now".

The weirdest was Bill Murray. No idea who he was as a kid.
 
Being conned into a interstate drive, this Chris is becoming more similar to that Chris:
View attachment 2359282

View attachment 2359300
Untitled (1).png

Somewhere, a small Chipman isn't eating Frankenberry, he's eating the box it came in. When the lights shut off, he knows his neighbors found the extension cord siphoning juice from their home. If the state goons came to take him away, he wouldn't shed a tear. Why?

Because his father goes treasure hunting when begging doesn't pay the bills. Despite his unique genetic challenges, he knows his father is finding new and inventive ways to skirt real work.
 
I think Dragon Ball Z also had a similar premise, but aimed at boys, natch. You saw an idiot savant who, possibly due to his Saiyan nature, has only two interests in his life, and those are fighting and becoming stronger, and then get excited for more fights, all at the expense of his family, close friends and the entire world, who are perfectly fine with his simpleton mannerisms. On the very least, you saw Goku and his buds train and bust their bones to achieve their powers, but still. I think there was a discussion about the consequences of Goku being a shit father and husband somewhere in this very thread.
Goku is certainly a hedonist and a simpleton but he's definitely not a monster. He's very protective of his friends and family and gets enraged when someone hurts or threatens them, and he very clearly has a moral code and refuses to kill whenever it isn't absolutely necessary. He's even kind to his villains and often wants to redeem them or make friends with them. Virtually all of Goku's friends were rivals or enemies at some point. I realize Toriyama never envisioned Goku as a Superman-level boy scout and wanted him to be immature and foolish, but to try to paint him as this absolute destructive retard ruining everyone's lives is totally off-base. Heck, he willingly sacrificed his life because he thought it would make earth safer.

The Universal Survival Arc used this dynamic as a conflict. All the big-brained pseudo-intellectual anime character analyzers (like Bob, if he was a weeb) were spouting big-brained theories about how Goku and his friends were the real villains because the tournament was his idea, he just wanted an excuse to beat people up and Jiren was the TRUE HERO because he LOVED JUSTICE and wanted to protect his world. Then, in the final act of the arc came a big fat serving of reality: Jiren turned out to be a selfish, violent asshole who was just using his friends as meat shields and only agreed to fight in the tournament to kill a rival. Goku, on the other hand, wanted to revive all the lost universes when his team won because he knew it was the only way all of them could be saved, and we learned that Xeno was just gonna destroy everything if the winner didn't wish for that exact thing.

A special mention goes to the new Broly movie, where when the villain went full power, Goku was distraught and horrified because he didn't want to kill or hurt an innocent person.

...sorry for the sperg out, but it was actually really fun to write about this. When you're talking about someone as loathsome and nasty as Bob, you need to let some steam off sometimes.
 
...sorry for the sperg out, but it was actually really fun to write about this. When you're talking about someone as loathsome and nasty as Bob, you need to let some steam off sometimes.

Hey, I love Dragon Ball Super sperg-outs! I was talking to a friend who believed that your (correct) interpretation of Jiren was inconsistent. The very last fight between him and Goku et al, he's clearly having a blast. If he was so single-mindedly driven for revenge, he'd never admit defeat just because he got punched around a little, right?

And he would be right. But Goku beating him didn't happen right before he went out of Ultra Instinct. It happened earlier than that. There's a moment where Jiren's furious and angrily yelling at Goku about strength. Goku insists that he's strong because of his friends and their support, whereas Jiren refuses to allow himself to be anything but alone. Jiren declares that he's going to show Goku what all of that means, and fires a blast at them. Jiren's big thing is that his master was killed by a mysterious fighter, and the trauma from that is what led him to pursue absolute power and isolation, so he'd never have to lose everything again. In that moment, he tries to inflict that trauma on Goku...

...and Goku shuts him down and kicks the shit out of him for trying. He succeeds where Jiren failed and became the broken man he was. It was having that happen, having him realize that even though that person from his past was strong but wasn't following a path that would lead to strength like Goku's, that made him capable of enjoying life once again. Goku, literally by virtue of acting like a hero, saves Jiren alongside his friends, and that's pretty wonderful, in my humble opinion.

In conclusion, it can be really fun to analyze properties and draw inspiration from your heroes. But if your inspiration drives you to decry those who disagree with you as monsters who need to pacified with force, I think it's good to analyze why you're taking that inspiration from them. (Actually, now that I'm thinking about it, wasn't Frieza the one who wanted an immortal body to forever inflict himself on others?)
 
I now see why SJW-driven works take so much inspiration from certain anime like Pokémon and Sailor Moon.
In the former, you saw a literal ten-year-old kid going around the world capturing critters, battling and whatnot. All with the simple motivation of being the best, like no one ever was. I think later on he and his travel buddies started getting entrenched in world-dominating/destroying conspiracies, but the original rarely touched that.

And in the latter, you saw a total loser of a girl suddenly become not only a tremendously powerful warrior, but also the literal Queen of the World, who marries the hottest guy around, gets powers to defeat her enemies at the most convenient time, and also cheats death not once, but twice. More, if you count the movies. All with literally weaponized love, because in case you forgot, it's a shoujo and Japanese girls love those frigging things, it seems. And the author even said a good portion of Usagi's ethos and happenings to her are her own power fantasies at play.

I think Dragon Ball Z also had a similar premise, but aimed at boys, natch. You saw an idiot savant who, possibly due to his Saiyan nature, has only two interests in his life, and those are fighting and becoming stronger, and then get excited for more fights, all at the expense of his family, close friends and the entire world, who are perfectly fine with his simpleton mannerisms. On the very least, you saw Goku and his buds train and bust their bones to achieve their powers, but still. I think there was a discussion about the consequences of Goku being a shit father and husband somewhere in this very thread.

Mind you, those aren't the rule, but are possibly the most popular in their target demographic, at least for Western audiences. I'm not one to bray about "bad examples" but I can't help but see the patterns.

But yeah, the point is that content creators have purely fantasy-fulfilling works as their references. You can't just have Captain Marvel as a woman who must overcome her ego to truly earn her place in the pantheon of heroes. Das sexist! She's perfect and powerful already, so she can do whatever she wants! Oh, a lesbian couple where one of the parts was nothing but an abusive jerk to her, and was more of a wrench to their plans than anything? Fuck that, LESBUNS! Therefore Catra will change her heart, declare her love for Adora in the nick of time, have her crimes forgiven and they live happily ever after! No questions, just consoom and live your fantasy.

Sorry for the long rant.
I'm compelled to play devil's advocate here, largely for Sailor Moon's sake, but anything SJWs take from the anime they watch (or anything they consume) ends up being the most shallow thing possible.

Ash in Pokemon didn't have every single thing handed to him. There are numerous instances in the series where he and his pokemon are shown working themselves to exhaustion to earn something, and plenty of times where he loses and either has to pick himself up and try harder, or just has to accept that he lost.

Compare that to something like Iron Heart, where Riri just gets everything with little to no work and with an absolute excess of entitlement. Imagine Riri losing a challenge and then having to pick herself up and either coming back stronger or taking it as a lesson in humility. You can't, can you? Neither can anyone who writes her.

With Sailor Moon, the fantasy that Naoko Takeuchi was living through it was being in a circle of friends that loved one another. All of the girls in Sailor Moon are oddballs who stand out in their own particular way that made them outsiders and left them feeling lonely. Along comes Usagi, a girl who's too much of an innocent little dummy to see what makes them stand out as bad. On the contrary, she actually likes them because of it. Sure, she's a clumsy airhead who trips over her own feet during a fight, but she also takes you by the hand, looks you in the eyes, and says "I like you the way you are." That's why there are so many instances of characters in Sailor Moon sacrificing themselves to save someone else. One of the biggest themes of Sailor Moon is the idea that you love someone so much, in one way or another, that you'd die for them.

SJW characters could never sacrifice themselves like that, because they don't love anyone except themselves. That's because the people who write that shit don't love anyone except themselves.

Also, most SJW fans of Sailor Moon never look past the fact that it has same-sex romances in it, on account of the fact that they're childish perverts. Nowhere is that more obvious than in Steven Universe, where the relationships all seem to have been written by a little kid and edited by a sex offender.

Darkwing is what I like to call a joke hero. A hero you’re not supposed to take seriously.
Darkwing Duck is a comedic character, and even he's a better hero just by virtue of the fact that he's a loving, selfless father. Imagine woke vermin writing a character who's a good parent. Imagine them writing a man who's a good father!
 
Things must be fine for Chris if he can fart off for a trip to find money, all those problems he had just disappeared.

Chris is so much more morally reprehensible than Bob in one aspect. This motherfucker is responsible for other people's wellbeing and he chooses to act like this.

What a giant, giant piece of shit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back