Here's the ethics for this example.
You've been given a number of reasons that you've outright rejected, but here are some more, not that they'll make any difference to you.
I was just disagreeing with your statement that maybe I took too literally, because your statement literally meant "they can't claim we did the SWATting if we don't allow doxing", because oh lawdy they certainly can and will do just that.
I would argue banning doxing now would just make the site look guilty of something. We've done nothing wrong and especially nothing illegal. These retards just have negative opsec skills
I'm much the same. Though I made an account a bit earlier and have been meaning to post more but never really round to it. That being said, I totally understand why I'd be viewed with suspicion now.
The "publicly accessible" part is another I struggle with. If the twitter user in your example is stupid with his info sure. But the doxes that are uncovered through autistic connect-the-dots with a half-dozen other accounts spanning a decade from when the person was 12 or some shit? Cringy, and those are the ones most celebrated. The question for me isn't whether its legal or if you can, its if you should. And for what purpose? The intimidation flex is a big one for me.
How do you not understand just how fucking stupid you are?
I said it would be harder to make the accusations stick not that they wouldn't still screech the accusations. They're always going to do that.
My issue during all of this is that no legal action has been taken, but precedent has been set. DDoS attacks will be allowed if a site is unsavory, DDoS Protection is effectively a private security company that will abandon you at the first sight of mean words if Janke isn't involved.
This is all still perfectly legal though. If I post a picture showing part of my neighborhood on a 13 year old forum account, than a picture from a different angle showing just enough of the same neighborhood today for some autist on the Internet to easily deduce my neighborhood than what's to stop anyone from doing it besides the desire and willpower?
For what purpose is any cow here doxed outside of the confirmed pedophiles and zoosadists? There's no real moral argument to it in my opinion, people dox cows because it gets a rise out of them when it is far more likely than not to never escalate beyond people sending them pizza or hookers.
Optics to who? Let's assume doxing is outright banned on this site and all doxes not on confirmed criminals are taken down. That will change nobody's minds. The Twitter trannies are still going to hate us for daring to call them men, the media outlets they've infested are still going to smear us as hardcore Nazi white supremacists, the lolcows are still going to cry victim and claim we want to hurt or kill them. There's no reason to try and look good at this point. The best we can do is what we always have, tell fedposters/weens to fuck off and laugh at the cows without ever interfering with their lives. At least that way the site remains legal as it always has, despite the numerous attempts to portray it as anything but.
Lol, And I want anime to be real.
That's exactly why recently I was very glad to provide updated info on a pedo that had gone incognito for a couple years.
Brought this person up on the Telegram.
Public opinion isn't going to do shit, we're not talking about a large-scale public backlash but rather a small group of retarded trannies who'll want the site gone no matter what we do. We could become the number 1 LGBT site and ban people from talking about anyone but straggots and they'll still hate us. Ultimately we just need reliable, effective protection.
If we come back to the clearnet (and I'm optimistic we do, in some form), I bet Lucas' followers will have eaten him alive. Thus is the way of woke/troon Twitter.We’ve been gone less than a day, and Keffals’ own following is yelling at him for blocking niggers. Something I thought everyone did.
