world of shit
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
I can agree on this approach. In my experience, Qualitative is 80% of the work work (DCF analysis, etc), where quantitative serves as support for the target.The mathematical foundation only provides theoretical guarantees about long run pricing and bounds on risk. Of course, that on its own is not going to make any money, but it definitely helps ground short run ideas in some sense of reality.
Just to be clear, I do not have an educational background in investing or finance, and mostly self-taught. I just have worked on enough quant data modeling projects, predictive analysis, data science, and ancillary support engineering systems to get a decent idea how the big dogs act, and try to emulate them (including some hedge funds that would get eggs thrown at me if people knew).
Unfortunately very true. I worked as a consultant at one, and met a lot of philosophy/anthro major, but they were all from top 10s schools. However, for hiring nothing but top talent, they have the biggest clusterfucks of systems/software I've ever seen. Who the fuck writes their own database system rather than use something from oracle/MS? And who writes that custom database system to rely on recursion for table relationships.Getting an internship at a random hedge fund is a joke. Just get enrolled in a marginally prestigious undergrad program and places like Citadel will already be knocking on your door. I'd be shocked if a CFA helped you at all vs them accepting every semi competent person they could find. In fact, I know of hedge funds where having qualifications like a CFA will be a hindrance to getting hired.
However, if you're a women, to get an internship at a HF, just be attractive. I am not joking. My jaw dropped on my first day. Literally every women was a 10.