likeacrackado
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2020
The range of opinions is what drew me to A&H in the firstplace, that and the clickbait titles. It was refreshing to see a place where ironic and unironic racism existed and wasn't a circlejerk. The topics discussed are bound to draw up the hyperbole more than other stuff on the site. Childrape, war and political strife up the ante more than the next game DSP will suck at or the next candybar some fatty shoves in their mouth. Could use a few more tankies to spice things up, the contrasting neolib schtik of running off to complain about muh A&H everytime they get bad ratings is stale.It should also be taken into consideration that for every person who's going on some diatribe about the Elders of Zion, there's 50 more who wish that he'd shut up and who knows how many people lurking around and not saying a word. People just have a tendency to focus on the negative because that's how brains are wired, so they don't much care for the couple dozen of posts that more or less just stride down the middle of the aisle and they can't formulate an opinion on the people who never say anything, but that person in the corner screaming about White Extinction is going to garner a lot of attention.
The exception being threads that are implicitly about Jews or black people. Those threads are a guaranteed train wreck because it attracts them like moths to a flame.
I've always said that the majority of A&H are not racist people, there are just racist people in A&H. I don't much care for it and I don't think it solves anything and I think that every racism-driven theory and ideology is ridiculous because most of them are the exact, same theory with the races shuffled around, but if someone wants to pound out gamer words on the internet: I'm not their mom. That's not my business.
All of the people elsewhere on the site who go to similar lengths to decry The Great Un-Penising or to lament the caloric intake of the nearest ham planet all fall under the same guidance as A&H: Go for it, go nuts, stack that shit to the ceiling, but if calls for specific, physical action become a part of your routine, you've stepped over a line. I can guarantee with absolute certainty that if someone repeatedly ran into the Amberlynn threads and started discussing her murder, or started trying to formulate a plan for how to deal with the scooty puff menace infesting every slowly-rounding corner of our country, they'd be thrown off the website faster than food vanishes off Amber's plate.
It's something of an awkward position because I can understand the arguments from both sides of the extreme, I just don't agree with them. The vast majority of the userbase in the sub-forum is wandering around in the middle of the field and never does anything untowards, so punishing the entirety of them for the behaviour of a few and for the actionable behaviour of a single person who wasn't a regular user of the sub-forum in the first place isn't sensible, to me.