- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
Mason,Hudson, and Woods will be back. That's hype.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BO2's main story was alright, I just wish they did more with it. Have the US military actually be weakened by their over-reliance on technology and use that concept for more than one mission. Hell, if you really want to be brave with the idea, use it to show how our over-reliance on impersonal methods of warfare have desensitized us to the realities of war.Black Ops 2 and Advanced Warfare were the best of the franchise purely because of how bug fucking nuts the stories got.
I appreciate WaW for setting Black Ops and to an extent creating a really good trilogy of Single player campaigns. Black Ops 3 single player is ass, only redeeming quality is Zombies on PC for modability.CoD: World At War will always be my favorite even though I played Modern Warfare 2 more.
I agree, though they did stagnate with Black Ops 3 and 4. Didn’t help with the shotty mtx they implemented in BO3A World at War reboot I would've liked. WaW approached WW2 with grit rarely showcased in media. The Russian campaign in particular wasn't playing.
You have to admire Treyarch for their innovation to CoD.
I was kind of hoping it was a reboot taking place in the new MW universe. The Black Ops "story" went off the rails with BO3 and BO4
I mean, I'll take what I can get though when it comes to Cold War era stuff.
It actually may still take place in the MW universe. New Warzone content is referencing this game and there's rumors it may start a "divergent timeline" that ignores BO2/3/4 and tie into MW.
We'll see. I kinda liked BO2 but 3/4 were so bad I wouldn't mind them being retconned out of existence.
It actually may still take place in the MW universe. New Warzone content is referencing this game and there's rumors it may start a "divergent timeline" that ignores BO2/3/4 and tie into MW.
We'll see. I kinda liked BO2 but 3/4 were so bad I wouldn't mind them being retconned out of existence.
CoD: WWII was a mistake, everything was ass about thatCall of Duty: WWII to fill that role, which I highly doubt.
It just might, and maybe they go rogue due to the machinations of this "Proteus".If this is a direct sequel, hopefully, it will pick back up on the plot point that Mason, Weaver and Hudson have seen too much and have been marked for death.
Imagine if they went full balls-out on that concept: play the Japanese through Marco Polo Brdge, the Rape of Nanking, the Battle of Nanjing, make them take part in the utter fucking fuck of that campaign, then swap them to the Chinese perspective going into the second half of the game as the war starts turning against Japan, and fight them back, exacting revenge on the invaders. It'd make World at War look like a fucking water balloon fight.Personally I'd like a game that explores the second Sino-Japanese War, but that would invariably be too spicy for the Chinese market.
Also yes, of course Activision is going to suck China's dick. Why would you expect otherwise?
My only hope is that COD Cold War doesn't fuck up Warzone, whatever the relation may be. I don't want a Warzone 2 yet.
Treyarch did their own BR mode with Blackout but you had to buy Black Ops 4 to access it. AND they stopped updating Black Ops 4 with Operation: Dark Divide.I don't know how true this is, but I've heard that with each new call of duty it'll have a new map and new weapons from that game. Again I don't know. But knowing how activision loves milking yearly releases it would make sense for them to have a new one every year. Will it be an update to warzone or will it be a new stand alone BR that uses warzone as a base then change shit (like every call of duty)? I'm leaning towards the latter.