- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
He certainly seems to get into less trouble when he's having regular interaction with the trolls.
Trolls are basically his babysitters.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He certainly seems to get into less trouble when he's having regular interaction with the trolls.
The fact that CWC has stood trial before is irrelevant. 18 U.S.C.A. §4241, which is U.S. Federal Code, elaborates on a motion to determine the competency of a defendant. It basically says, " At any time after the commencement of a prosecution for an offense and prior to the sentencing of the defendant, or at any time after the commencement of probation or supervised release and prior to the completion of the sentence, the defendant or the attorney for the Government may file a motion for a hearing to determine the mental competency of the defendant."I don't think the insanity defense can be invoked for every crime in the US, but I'm fairly certain it's allowed for cases of assault, which would cover Chris's macing of the employee. The problem for Chris is, as mentioned up-thread, it's very hard to pull off successfully; at the very least you have to convince the judge that not only are you stark raving mad, but you're literally incapable of telling the difference between what is right and what is wrong. They made the defense far harder to use - and some states just got rid of it altogether - after John Hinckley successfully used it after his attempt to kill Reagan.
The other way of pulling the insanity defense is to convince the judge that the defendant is unable to stand trial, but if anything that'd be even harder to pull off since Chris has stood trial before.
Oh man, there were kids in the store. Hope they're okay.
Oh, sorry I don't stalk Chris's lawyer you dickface.
The best part of all of this is that Chris is going to go to jail over fucking Sonic Boom. Just typing that makes my nose bleed.
Ignore me if I'm talking out of my arse, but in the UK, insanity is only a complete defence to murder. You can't get off any other charge with it, so every time somebody mentions that Chris could plead insanity I sperg-foam at the mouth. Over here, his autism would be a mitigating factor to any sentence he received, undoubtedly, but he can't just 'get off' on a plea of insanity because he didn't murder anyone.
Another big event I missed.
Chris will probably go to jail--the events of October 2011 weren't expunged, and that WILL be brought up in court.
He certainly seems to get into less trouble when he's having regular interaction with the trolls.
Some people have discussed the issue of Chris having a public defender and how he might not qualify for one. He could still try legal aid (does UVA have a law school? Usually or try and get a lawyer to do it pro bono work for them. My understanding is most state bars suggest that practicing attorneys do a certain number of pro bono work, but I'm not sure if a mentally deficient manchild macing a store clerk for asking him to stop defacing a sign for a video game would be done pro bono. I get that technically Chris owns a house and a car, but he's also receiving government aid and I pretty sure on top of the "tugboat" he gets food stamps and Medicare.
Someone else has probably said this but the US does do things differently than in the UK, though we do have the same common law tradition. Again, this is from my INTERNET LAWYER experience but it's extremely difficult to pull off an insanity plea and there's a high criteria that needs to be met. I don't think Chris spazzing out over a Sonic Boom would meet that criteria. I've heard some jurisdictions have a verdict of "guilty but mentally ill" where you're still found guilty but the fact you're mentally ill is taken into account and you're sent to a psych hospital.
I've mentioned this before but I think he got the whole "sensory overload" idea from that Temple Grandin talk he went to. It's sad that she probably talked about how she faced a lot of adversity due to her autism but she managed to use her autism to become a brilliant academic in her field, when all Chris seemed to get from it was "sensory overload" is a thing and he seems to think it's an excuse for vandalizing private property. I know quite a few people on the autism spectrum and for them, sensory overload just means that they're being overwhelmed and might need to go somewhere quiet for a bit or do something soothing. Chris seems to think that suffering from sensory overload means going into a rage and going apeshit on people.
Someone else mentioned that he's going to try and claim discrimination on the basis of being transgendered. I had a feeling that when he was asking people from HRC for help, he was playing the transgendered thing to get their help. Obviously I don't see this playing out at all in court but I could see Chris expecting that because he's transgendered, that means if someone does something mean to him, it's automatically discrimination.
What ironic is that Chris is going to get into allot of trouble over the one thing he loves the most, sonic.
It is not just a question about whether he can be found "not guilty" because of insanity. A judge who sees or hears Chris is likely to conclude he has some issues. Autism is a well-recognized, but poorly understood name that can be put on these issues. This may mitigate sentencing if he is found guilty, or encourage the judge to substitute some "hard time" for some community service, probation, or counselling.3) Insanity defense: Both my parents have law degrees (my dad practices, still no details) and I can tell you that insanity is an INCREDIBLY hard thing to plea, unless you're shooting a gay San Fransico Mayor after eating Twinkies (heh, law humor). Jeffery Dahmer tried to plea insanity, and it didn't fly, so Chris has a snowball's chance in hell of pleading it.
5) Pepper spray? Mace? Perfume?: It's been confirmed by a couple of sources that it's pepper spray. At this point it doesn't matter, it is legally assault no matter what, and what exactly it was is semantics.