Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Got another attempt of some of the people being harassed by Acerthorn trying to talk it out.
679926E8-2B9C-496D-87DB-66F0F11E51C7.jpeg
 
Could he take his computer? On the other hand, I wouldn't risk it. This guy probably has terabytes of cp or some shit on his drive.
The accidental livestream has to be the tip of some disturbing iceberg that is stored on his computer. Having that thing has to be some kind of cognitohazard that will turn you into another Acerthorn.
 
Could he take his computer? On the other hand, I wouldn't risk it. This guy probably has terabytes of cp or some shit on his drive.
I wouldn't dare touch anything electronics-related. Man stabbed his father because he lagged, imagine if Sid takes his goddamn roach-infested setup. It might be enough to send the retard on a stabbing spree.
 
I wouldn't dare touch anything electronics-related. Man stabbed his father because he lagged, imagine if Sid takes his goddamn roach-infested setup. It might be enough to send the retard on a stabbing spree.
This dude while talking to his universities disability department casually mentioned that if they didn't do what he wanted he would shoot up their school in a similar style to Virginia Tech.

this man needs to actually be put somewhere,


Edit: Apparently the lady who was talking to this ogre was heavily considering pushing their panic button when he just oh so casually mentioned that.
 
Last edited:
this man needs to actually be put somewhere,
Honestly surprised he wasn't committed at some point. What are the laws pertaining to that in Arkansas? Couldn't his parents put in a petition to have him committed at some point, or are we going to have to wait for the inevitable night of the were-turkey for that to happen?
 
Honestly surprised he wasn't committed at some point. What are the laws pertaining to that in Arkansas? Couldn't his parents put in a petition to have him committed at some point, or are we going to have to wait for the inevitable night of the were-turkey for that to happen?
Deinstitutionalization was one of the biggest mistakes of the 20th century.
 
Rogue reveals that Acerthorn claims that Creetosis and co. hacked him. Creetosis and SidAlpha comment on it.

Rogue - "It appears that @acerthorn is now claiming is been superhacked via computer viruses by his opposition. I wasn’t aware that @SidAlpha @creetosis and myself were spooky hackers or something."

FQLKLNkWYAgI9eU.jpeg.jpg


Creetosis - "Nothing is ever his fault and everything bad that happens to him is always 100% the fault of people he doesn't like. The worst he's gotten from any of us is being laughed at for being a weirdo and criticized for being wrong about shit. If any of us had hacked his account, why in the world would we do crypto scamming shit with it? The optimal thing to do, had we hacked his account, was use his own account to make fun of him, which obviously didn't happen. God, he's so pathetic."


To Rogue's commend SidAlpha responds with:

"Almost like some sort of Shadow Cabal..."


Re: Creetosis comment. Interestingly, I am not aware of Acerthorn claiming the hack was a "crypto scam", but maybe Creetosis was just giving an example
 
https://imgur.com/a/b1uUzCX update today from the courts on Asscorns emergency motion
aleOxRA.png
The way I read this, it seems that the Court agrees that 128 (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal) managed to sneak in just ahead of the corporate defendants' filing 129 (Joint Motion to Dismiss), although the Court's tone in this order seems almost begrudging.

I suspect that the corporate defendants filed their Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Joint Motion to Dismiss without first doing a search to see if any further filings had been made. Perhaps a docket search on this case was done earlier that morning just before the paralegal or whoever drafted the filing started working on it, thus they didn't see the need to do another search immediately prior to filing. Either way, it seems like a simple timing issue and possibly a minor clerical error rather than the egregious disregard for due process that Stabbins makes it out to be.

It also seems that the view from my armchair wrt 132 and 133 being moot wasn't entirely accurate. I thought it'd make sfa difference as filing these would be like closing the stable door after the horse has bolted (see 128 ). If anything, 132 and 133 (especially 133) seems to have put Stabbins at greater risk of being sanctioned by the Court.

I get the feeling docket numbers will get used a lot ITT, as there's going to be a metric fuckton of filings with very long names that we'll all get sick of typing
 
Last edited:
https://imgur.com/a/b1uUzCX update today from the courts on Asscorns emergency motion
Doc attached.
The way I read this, it seems that the Court agrees that 128 (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal) managed to sneak in just ahead of the corporate defendants' filing 129 (Joint Motion to Dismiss), although the Court's
Indeed.
I suspect that the corporate defendants filed their Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
That was filed by Acerthorn

My thoughs. Court is mad. Read this part: "However, the Court does not endorse Plaintiff’s efforts to manipulate the litigation process and his blatant gamesmanship. Should Plaintiff continue to dismiss and refile cases in bad faith to obtain a different result, he risks being declared a vexatious litigant in this district.". Acerthorn fucked up big time.

This is interesting too: "Finally, the Court STRIKES Plaintiff’s “Emergency Motion to Expedite” for failure to comply with the Civil Local Rules. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 6-1."
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Here's a VOD of his stream "Responding to SidAlpha's Video About Me" mentioned in the OP, that you thankfully don't have to pay to see. He starts talking around 8:19. (out of breath before he even starts lmao)
He likes to claim anyone laughing at him is a "malicious, willful malicious fucking troll" for laughing at him lol.


I only have the Audio Version saved right now, I'll work on getting the video soon. I'm sorry if this doesn't contribute much I just figured it'd be funny.
 
View attachment 3173752
The way I read this, it seems that the Court agrees that 128 (Notice of Voluntary Dismissal) managed to sneak in just ahead of the corporate defendants' filing 129 (Joint Motion to Dismiss), although the Court's tone in this order seems almost begrudging.

I suspect that the corporate defendants filed their Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without first doing a search to see if any further filings had been made. Perhaps a docket search on this case was done earlier that morning just before the paralegal or whoever drafted the filing started working on it, thus they didn't see the need to do another search immediately prior to filing. Either way, it seems like a simple timing issue and possibly a minor clerical error rather than the egregious disregard for due process that Stabbins makes it out to be.

It also seems that the view from my armchair wrt 132 and 133 being moot wasn't entirely accurate. I thought it'd make sfa difference as filing these would be like closing the stable door after the horse has bolted (see 128 ). If anything, 132 and 133 (especially 133) seems to have put Stabbins at greater risk of being sanctioned by the Court.

I get the feeling docket numbers will get used a lot ITT, as there's going to be a metric fuckton of filings with very long names that we'll all get sick of typing
The Judge is also overseeing the Rebolo case, which has the same corporate defendants and deals with the same issues.

One thing interesting about the order, is that the order does not address Docket Number 129-1, most likely because it was not explicitly mentioned in the motion to strike. I need to brush up on my civil procedure, but 129-1 may still be part of the record. It will be interesting to see if the Judge takes Judicial Notice of the facts stated in the request for Judicial Notice when ruling on the Motion for Default Judgment.

Edit: Not that it really matters if it is still in the record because the Judge can take Judicial Notice on his own under FRE 201(c)(1), but it would be really funny if the court took notice just because he forgot to include it as a part of his motion to strike.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
I think my favorite of his lawsuits is when he tried suing the state of Texas for $5 trillion just because he sent Greg Abbott a dollar and expected it to be sent back in a day.

Motherfucker really tried to sue for nearly a quarter of the US economy View attachment 3159557
This and the Microsoft lawsuit makes me think he's just grifting but too legally retarded to know how to trap someone in a lawsuit or the legality of maliciously trapping someone in a lawsuit
 
That was filed by Acerthorn
I knew I'd get the filing names transposed. Might just stick with docket numbers. At this rate, we're going to need a Google Sheet with all the filings and docket numbers for each lolsuit Stabbins has on the go.
My thoughs. Court is mad.
Big mad.
This and the Microsoft lawsuit makes me think he's just grifting but too legally retarded to know how to trap someone in a lawsuit or the legality of maliciously trapping someone in a lawsuit
Like a counterfeiter that only knows how to forge $2 bills, or a car thief that only knows how to steal Pontiac Azteks.
"If he gets nailed with attys fees, the dude wouldn't just be nuked into the stone age, he'll be nuked into the Carboniferous. XD"
🌈

Nah, he'll just move onto another court and continue as though nothing has happened (notwithstanding a slight reduction in hot dog money as a result of having his tugboat garnished to pay SidAlpha et al's legal costs).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Back