Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 184 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.6%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,257 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,240
Someone sent me Acerthorn Discord tag
7938CF81-2DB1-4959-A05D-12D8F6F37F8A.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  1. Plaintiff Acer, a recognized “vexatious” litigant (Stebbins v. Stebbins, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93528 (W.D. Ark. July 3, 2013)), has asserted copyright infringement claims alleging that a handful of Individual Defendants posted infringing content on YouTube, Twitch, and Discord. Rather than simply sue the persons who posted that content, he also asks this Court to enter a needless and improper injunction under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) that would require the service providers – or their parent companies Amazon (of Twitch) and Alphabet (of YouTube) – to “permanently terminate” the “individuals’ accounts” and “not permit” them “to create any new accounts for any reason.” Dkt. 55 (SAC) ¶ 126. The Court should dismiss Mr. Acer’s claims against all Corporate Defendants with prejudice, and warn Mr. Acer that continued frivolous filings could result in sanctions.

    First, the sole work at issue in this case – a video of Mr. acer that was recorded
    accidentally through a fixed camera – is not copyrightable to begin with. Copyright protection
    subsists in creative works of authorship that are fixed in a tangible medium of expression by a
    human author. But here, Mr. acer admits that the video was created by accident, without his
    knowledge, and without the slightest spark of creativity on his part
    all of Mr.acer’s infringement claims should be dismissed without needing to go further.


    He is widely ridiculed by other users on those services, in
    large part because of his years’-long abuse of the court system
    has bogged down
    courts across the nation with frivolous lawsuits.

An update on his most recent lawsuit against Polano from the corpo suits representing Discord / Alphabet / Amazon (Discord, Youtube and Twitch respectively). I will get screencaps later after I am done with my night job. He is going to get destroyed and probably will get heavily sanctioned that he can't sue Null.
 
All of this is insane. He doesn't even allege that he meets the requirements for the injunctions (he does not)
Stabbins is wiggling under a real threat, updating the case against SofiannP (Polano) – one, two.

AND he has balls to mock Corporate Defendants who were responding to him.

1649739831402.png
 

Attachments

An update on his most recent lawsuit against Polano from the corpo suits representing Discord / Alphabet / Amazon (Discord, Youtube and Twitch respectively). I will get screencaps later after I am done with my night job. He is going to get destroyed and probably will get heavily sanctioned that he can't sue Null.
Stabbins is wiggling under a real threat, updating the case against SofiannP (Polano) – one, two.

AND he has balls to mock Corporate Defendants who were responding to him.

View attachment 3170912

Oh goddamn, this fat sack of shit pulled off a level of fuckery that will just piss off the Judge.
1649740884977.png

1649741491736.png

The Judge is going to rip into the fat fucker for this kind of conduct. And the judge should consider the contents of the MtD when looking at the merits of the default Judgment, even though the motion itself is moot. The fat pig has made his intentions extremely clear, and bringing this case forward again would just be a waste of everyone's time.
 
Oh goddamn, this fat sack of shit pulled off a level of fuckery that will just piss off the Judge.
View attachment 3170915

View attachment 3170934

The Judge is going to rip into the fat fucker for this kind of conduct. And the judge should consider the contents of the MtD when looking at the merits of the default Judgment, even though the motion itself is moot. The fat pig has made his intentions extremely clear, and bringing this case forward again would just be a waste of everyone's time.
He really can't help himself, can he? He literally tells the gov that this is a motion to try to game the court.

Also, I haven't seen docket 132 posted, so I'm posting it now:

REPLY (re MOTION to Strike Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, Joint MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byDavid A. Stebbins.

N.D.Cal._4 21-cv-04184-JSW_132_01.png
N.D.Cal._4 21-cv-04184-JSW_132_02.png
N.D.Cal._4 21-cv-04184-JSW_132_03.png
N.D.Cal._4 21-cv-04184-JSW_132_04.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Hoo boy... :story:

1649750507408.png
Right now, Acerthorn is probably rocking back and forth in front of his computer, making wild animal noises and muttering to himself under his breath, whilst smashing out some fresh lolsuits on his dried mustard and ketchup-encrusted keyboard: defamation suits against Sanjay M. Nangia, Davis White Tremaine LLP and Amazon the three attorneys that signed off this Motion to Dismiss because of this observation of the fact that Acerthorn is "widely ridiculed by other users" on YouTube and Twitch.

As an added bonus, he's probably going to try and sue Amazon, Google, Discord and the legal firms each of these respective companies has retained for vicarious liability over the actions of the three attorneys that signed off on this filing.

EDIT: Regarding Dkt. 132 (Reply re: MOTION to Strike Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, Joint MOTION to Dismiss)...

1649752768985.png

1649752848553.png
1649754277619.png
If as Acerthorn asserts, the filing of Dkt.128 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal closed this file on 11 April 2022 12:57 PST, this reply (Dkt.132) should also be dismissed as it was filed after 11 April 2022 12:57 PST, should it not? Ergo the Court needn't strike the Motion to Dismiss, nor would Acerthorn have incurred costs for an alleged "frivolous delay" as a result of Dkts.130 and 131 being filed. The Court wouldn't need to give the corporate defendents leave to re-appear in the case, as said case - according to Acerthorn - was dismissed as at 11 April 2022 12:57 PST.

Bear in mind I'm taking the validation of citing Commercial Space Management Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F. 3d 1074 (9th Cir. 1999) on face value, as I'm not a legal Kiwi. All I know is that this case and the cited case are both Ninth Circuit and that I probably know about as much about the American legal system as Acerthorn does.
 
Last edited:
@Mister Mint can you add this to the OP?

It's from the district of Arkansas regarding Acerthorn. I think it sums up his legal history, and him, very well.

a1.PNG
a2.PNG
a3.PNG
a4.PNG
a5.PNG
a6.PNG

SidAlpha on the lawsuit:

"Here goes Acerthorn, making everyone else's jobs easier by being a moron. He's managed to piss off the Attorneys for the Corporate defendants and now they seem out for blood even more than before. And they should be. Acerthorn is his own worst enemy. By the way, they are also teeing up a certain half-Asian Kraken by calling out his lack of consideration of Fair Use."


"Agreed. The Attorney was very clear during the call. I know a lot of people have already exhibited concern about my showing my own opinion + details of the case, trust me, the Attorney is FAR better equipped and much more knowledgeable than I. I will continue to share what I can, HOWEVER, no plans of process will ever be divulged, merely updates over the results of actions. After all, as Moon King says, why give him ammunition."



"All I have to say is leonardjfrench frigging called it, and now that the Corporate Attorneys got pissed off by Acerthorn, they are hammering the point home. If accepted by the Judge, this is MASSIVE for ALL of the defendants. Talk about cutting him off at the knees."


"This filing is a nuke being dropped on Acerthorn's head if accepted by the Judge, which I expect it will be. And will make our jobs MUCH easier as it would eradicate over half of his claims of alleged infringement, which is also why he scrambled to try and dismiss them from the lawsuit so the facts they present wouldn't come into consideration. I suspect he will fail once again."

 
@Mister Mint can you add this to the OP?
Thanks, I'll include it in a handful of updates I plan to make tonight.
"WOW not even going to apologize for misgendering her"
Jesus, it takes a lot to be more unlikable than Acerthorn but she's walking the line.
 
Acerthorn uploads a short in which he displays just how bad he is at playing games.

He tries an interesting tacking which consists of turning his back to the enemy, which predictably results in a swift death of Acerthorn
 
David learns the truth about his channel
He says that there's nothing wrong with this on Reddit (a) and contradicts himself in the title on YouTube – I'm Being Sexually Harassed by Twitch!


unless he thinks there can't be anything wrong with sexual harassment

there going to be another YouTuber going to be put on lawsuit.
Potentially more than one, because his video was added to another YT's already – Elden Ring Hot Takes. And Charlie (cr1t1kal/penguinz0) was already aware of him and considered covering but actually got to show SidAlpha's video to his viewers here, timeperiod 00:44:50 - 1:19:00.
 

Attachments

  • 1649764394436.png
    1649764394436.png
    48.2 KB · Views: 84
Also, I haven't seen docket 132 posted, so I'm posting it now
Document 133 posted by Acerthorn:
Emergency MOTION to Expedite 130 Motion to Strike filed by David A. Stebbins.

gov.uscourts.cand.379614.133.01.png
gov.uscourts.cand.379614.133.02.png
 

Attachments

@Mister Mint can you add this to the OP?

It's from the district of Arkansas regarding Acerthorn. I think it sums up his legal history, and him, very well.

a1.PNG
a2.PNG
a3.PNG
a4.PNG
a5.PNG
a6.PNG
If you could add these as well. Alphabet and Amazon really did describe acerthorn well
corponac1.PNG
corponac2.PNG
corponac3.PNG
corponac4.PNG
corponac5.PNG


I’ll asks the discord I’m in, but I think he took it down as soon as it was found
Gotcha. That's exactly why we have a policy of archiving everything.
 
Back