It would barely make it a movie given it be less than 50 minutes in length that way.
The fact that classic Simpsons is gonna be on there kinda defeats the purpose of making a family friendly service that censors Dumbo. There are a lot of early Simpsons episodes that are still edgy today. Not really comparable to the Jim Crow scenes I admit, but all the same you can't really have it both ways.
At this point, it'd be easier to just not have the movie on the service.
I know they'd probably censor Stark Raving Dad because of the Finding Neverland BS, but what other episodes would they cut out? The Cartridge Family is the only other one i can see not doing so well with the service. Maybe Saturdays of Thunder due to Bill Cosby's book playing a decent part in the plot (ditto Cosby's appearances in Round Springfield and Children of a Lesser Clod). But again, why? They'd be better off keeping it on FX and Simpsons World and not add it to Disney+ to begin with.
I know an episode of Family Guy is dropped from Freeform for a joke they decided not to deal with.
I'm glad you understand my frustration.
They appear during the last moments of the movie too so I don't even know how that's going to fucking work. Especially since at that same moment it's revealed his mother is alive and released from lock-up. If they cut that out too they'll make it look like the ringmaster had her put down after the Baby Mine scene, which makes the ending a lot less satisfying.
Not as strange as the fact that Splash Mountain is based around all the animated scenes from Song of the South.
At least someone thought it was a nice idea to use those characters at all. They still make comic books of them over in Europe.
I was thinking they pull what they plan to do with Dumbo and cut every scene with Apu out of the show entirely.
It came out on VHS in France too.Not really, these countries aren't as ruined as us.
Song of the South is my favorite anime.
I liked it, honestly. It was bright and happy and colorful, something you'd expect out of a Disney movie made into live action, rather than the muddy, destaturated color schemes of these more recent remakes. The costumes were unique and interesting and Lily James actually put in effort with her performance. While it wasn't as good as the original version, it was a fairly good remake that had enough Disney magic in it that it didn't seem soulless, unlike other remakes.
I really don't like these soulless remakes and I especially disliked Maleficent and Beauty and the Beast, but the Cinderella remake felt like it had more real effort and heart put into it than the other remakes. I was never that fond of the original quite frankly and it was honestly my least favorite Disney film of the classic era (which is probably why I'm not that interested in this film either), but when watching the remake, it doesn't feel like a remake of the original film, but rather a proper and interesting adaptation of the original book which references the Disney film, which helps to make the movie feel a bit more inspired in that regard than the other soulless cashgrab remakes which just copy the originals word for word while trying to come off as "better versions" or they try and go the edgy/gritty route. So yeah, Cinderella is probably worthy of a pass compared to the other remakes.
You would think a Frozen sequel would not be that hard an idea to do instantly but I guess they love playing the waiting game.