Feb 28, 2022 - Chris transferred to another facility

Status
Not open for further replies.
They might think it's diminished capacity on both sides. If I was his lawyer, and I'm not a lawyer, that is the angle I'd be pushing.

I think that's likely the case, the state has realised Chris is a problem to himself and others and they should have done something far sooner for both Barb and Chris. They do likely view what Chris did as Rape but there is the fact Barbs not all there any more, Chris isn't right in the head and in the current climate slapping a full blown rape charge on Chris the Autistic, trans, internet celebrity buffoon wont play well and likely garner support for him they don't want or need to deal with.

The same goes for Barb, she might have been willing but she's 80 / 81 years old and is in a diminished mental state so slapping her with an incest charge like Chris has been wouldn't be considered fair by some especially those with only a surface knowledge of the situation, so it's better to let her do her own thing and keep Her and Chris separated from each other and just let her run out the clock until she passes away.
 
Two random, very unlikely post-jail living situations I was wondering about. Neither of them are 'predictions' in any way but they're just hypotheticals involving interesting legal grey-areas.

1) Are there adult analogues to the shady 'troubled youth' facilities that operate in some states? That's the sort of circumstances I imagine could cause Chris to disappear from public life. Youth facilities get away with 'questionable' methods because some states give tons of leeway if parents agree so it would obviously be quite different, but are there adult facilities that say 'you can leave if you want to' but make it extremely difficult in any practical sense? Basically something like Scientology's sea-org.

It seems loosely plausible but I doubt it solely because I don't see any reason for them to do it. Fringe religious groups may abuse kids in the name of tough love as a sort of recruitment strategy and cults can use dedicated laborers, but I can't see Chris being an attractive recruit for any goal.

2) An extreme ween or weird sadist is the only exception I can imagine but that would be a different scenario. I wondered this a while back but it's worth bringing up again with the lack of content: are there any legal measures in place that would protect someone like Chris from being used as a kind of Circus freak? Say some next-level moron troll decided they would offer Chris lodging and food in exchange for being their trained monkey, would anything prohibit them from doing this? Imagine they say, "you can stay here but you live in the garage and you're on webcam 24/7 and viewers can tip to shout "JULAAY" out of speakers and you have to eat a pickle every day," but nothing stops Chris from leaving and there's no physical assault or psychological torture. They aren't landlord/tenant, employer/employee or a similar legally defined relationship, are there legal provisions covering just this general vibe of abuse?


I mostly agree with this, but I think this forum tends to over-estimate Chris's infamy in Ruckersville. Perhaps I'm just exceptionally disconnected from my tneighbors, but can anyone here name the nuisance criminals or creeps in your town? Outside of us who follow the story closely, would you remember a picture of Chris on a news story beyond just a weird looking person?
2 is extremely unwise, so it's likely a ween will do it. If you let Chris live in your house for a certain amount of time (I believe it's about 3 months), he'll become a legal resident and you can't throw him out without going through the eviction process in court, which can take months. During that time Chris has free reign of your house and no longer has to do anything you say.
 
I really don't think that taking Chris
off. the. internet
is any sort of viable 'cure' or solution. It's too late now. Also, Chris has learned a little - I stress that little - about avoiding the attentions of online weens and trolls. Also also, availability of internet has become increasingly essential to many people's business and working lives - it makes job applications, banking, all sorts of things a lot easier and less time-consuming. I can't see anyone specifically working to prevent Chris going online, and nor should they. It's the classic situation that any attempt at censorship ends up in - can you prove that the internet is actively damaging Chris any more than regular social contact or general interaction with the outside world is? No, you can't.
 
If they do however decide to keep him in there for a while, its likely we won't hear from him for years or perhaps the rest of his life
don't mental joints usually give the patients internet access?
it's usually the ones that are extremely dangerous to themselves or others that are completely locked out.
chris isn't a serious violent guy. chances are, he'll be back online in no time.
the reason he likely doesn't have it now is because he's under mental evaluation and observation, that probably requires some kind of controlled environment.
 
I have been hopeful for so long, but now that he's been disappeared for over a month, I think we might just have to get used to not hearing anything about Chris for long stretches of time.

Nobody can even confirm if his hoard has been thrown out, this is the most severe drought in milk in years.
When Chris inevitably ends up on the street we won't get that many updates from him but eventually he will learn from other homeless people. Homeless people typically get Obama phones (for those of you not familiar or not American Obama phone is a colloquial term for a government-funded cell phone where typically you'll get like 30 minutes a month. It's supposed to be used to apply for jobs and such but nobody ever uses it for that.) Well anyways Chris will most likely get an Obama phone and he will be recording videos walking to McDonald's where he can get free Wi-Fi and post them begging for money. So chances are we will get a Chris underneath the bridge begging for money video and you know weens will send him money.
 
When Chris inevitably ends up on the street we won't get that many updates from him but eventually he will learn from other homeless people. Homeless people typically get Obama phones (for those of you not familiar or not American Obama phone is a colloquial term for a government-funded cell phone where typically you'll get like 30 minutes a month. It's supposed to be used to apply for jobs and such but nobody ever uses it for that.) Well anyways Chris will most likely get an Obama phone and he will be recording videos walking to McDonald's where he can get free Wi-Fi and post them begging for money. So chances are we will get a Chris underneath the bridge begging for money video and you know weens will send him money.
Obama phones are now actually very good smart phones, with 5GB of data a month. At least, the crackheads near me all have these cheap samsung tracphones from welfare. It's a galaxy AO-something-or-other. Certainly capable to keep CWC's dopamine fix incoming. But even homeless, guaranteed a "ween" will set him up with a mobile plan either way. Because paying for chris to have cell service is a le epic troll
 
a specifically made phone from them for gibs.gov? interesting.
i see tons of LGs since they stopped making phones and needed to dump inventory. lots of huawei clones locked to some app store i don't recognize too. everything is android 10 and up though, and micro-USB is finally dead.

most plans i see lately are unlimited text, ~1000 minutes, and 0.5-1gig.

the 3rd parties that helped 'disadvantaged groups' get phones without all those pesky racist barriers like qualifying and ID are finally gone and things are looking reasonable now from a taxpayer POV.

anyway, chris... if he's conscious...
wherever he ends up if he's allowed a phone, he will have a far far harder time getting an obama-pwn without being able to hand the ISP a copy of his bank statement showing an SSI/D deposit.
so if he's released in a manner that leaves it to him to handle his affairs, i think we'll get years of youtube uploads from starbucks. 20 seconds each. all ending with,
"sir, you're not allowed to be here!"

paying for chris to have cell service is a le epic troll
i hope not. i think the starbucks runner saga would be funnier.
 
Last edited:
don't mental joints usually give the patients internet access?
No. Not normally. Especially when a patient has a history of abuse on the internet.

If Chris is committed, he won't have free access to the internet. In fact, having unsupervised access to the internet is the root of all of his problems dealing with his autism. His parents thought internet interaction would socialize him. It had the opposite result.

Autistic people should be monitored on the internet. They get into things they shouldn't if they are left to their own devices.
 
a specifically made phone from them for gibs.gov? interesting.
i see tons of LGs since they stopped making phones and needed to dump inventory. lots of huawei clones locked to some app store i don't recognize too. everything is android 10 and up though, and micro-USB is finally dead.

most plans i see lately are unlimited text, ~1000 minutes, and 0.5-1gig.

the 3rd parties that helped 'disadvantaged groups' get phones without all those pesky racist barriers like qualifying and ID are finally gone and things are looking reasonable now from a taxpayer POV.

There is a charity in the UK that gives phones and contracts to those in needs, normally it's people who've lost everything in a fire, people escaping abusive relationships, homeless people who are actively working towards not being homeless (if they are acvie drug users, drinkers etc they get stopped or not given one in the first place) they got a free phone and 12 months contract with 2gb of data, 1000 minutes and SMS and a few other things as well but they where given as a freebie from the Phone Network they used.

I've always been shocked that America started giving phones away before we have in the UK.

If Chris got one I could see him blowing through his data in a short time and begging for some kind of topup.

No. Not normally. Especially when a patient has a history of abuse on the internet.

If Chris is committed, he won't have free access to the internet. In fact, having unsupervised access to the internet is the root of all of his problems dealing with his autism. His parents thought internet interaction would socialize him. It had the opposite result.

Autistic people should be monitored on the internet. They get into things they shouldn't if they are left to their own devices.

Internet access in such places is a two edged sword, on one hand it could allow the patient to access information about there conditions, or communicate with family but for people like Chris who have a poor grasp on reality it could lead them down the rabbit hole and not all the sites with iffy reputations are not automatically blocked so depending on the person they could fall down the rabbit hole that landed them there in the first place.

For Chris to theioretically get a internet connection in such a place it would have to be heavily restricted and his use of it monitored, it would also have to be tailored to his personal case so it would need to block out any MLP, Pokemon Sonic and now religious and spiritual (and that can open up a legal can of worms) so having it would be so expensive and hard to manage they just don't offer it.

When he get's out unless there is a restriction put on his internet access I can see him making a bee-line towards the first open wifi access point and logging into twitter to rage at null, bella and everyone else who he thinks wronged him and dropping lots of information unintentionally.
 
When he get's out unless there is a restriction put on his internet access I can see him making a bee-line towards the first open wifi access point and logging into twitter to rage at null, bella and everyone else who he thinks wronged him and dropping lots of information unintentionally.
I genuinely think that this rant would never end. I can imagine Christian just fuming in a library or something on a public computer just smashing on the keyboard talking about how much he hates everyone who doubted him until he just falls over and dies of a heart attack.
 
Internet access in such places is a two edged sword, on one hand it could allow the patient to access information about there conditions, or communicate with family but for people like Chris who have a poor grasp on reality it could lead them down the rabbit hole and not all the sites with iffy reputations are not automatically blocked so depending on the person they could fall down the rabbit hole that landed them there in the first place.

For Chris to theioretically get a internet connection in such a place it would have to be heavily restricted and his use of it monitored, it would also have to be tailored to his personal case so it would need to block out any MLP, Pokemon Sonic and now religious and spiritual (and that can open up a legal can of worms) so having it would be so expensive and hard to manage they just don't offer it.

When he get's out unless there is a restriction put on his internet access I can see him making a bee-line towards the first open wifi access point and logging into twitter to rage at null, bella and everyone else who he thinks wronged him and dropping lots of information unintentionally.
At the rate it's going, when Chris gets out he's probably going to wind up in some kind of mental health program. Fifteen or so years ago, they'd regulate your internet access but I don't know if they can do that anymore. Back then, to get online, you needed a big computer or at least a laptop and you couldn't exactly be discrete about using those. Now we have smart phones and anyone who wants to go online can do so on a device that can fit into your pocket. And it's not like they're expensive, either; hell, you can even get a free phone for signing up with pre-paid, no contract cell phone companies. Not to mention, there are still public libraries out there that you can use to go online, although that will be heavily regulated. The only way they will be able to keep Chris off the internet will be if they forbid him from leaving the house and if his sentence is up, I don't know if they'll legally be able to do that.

So Chris getting onto the internet will be kinda a given but I have to imagine he'll have a case worker and tard wranglers who try to keep him away from sites he shouldn't be on. It's just a question of how much he listens to them, how much he fights them and how much he listens to the a-logs over his tard wranglers.

But that's assuming he actually gets out. I have a feeling they may let him out a month or two early, give him some restrictions he has to adhere to. He won't follow those rules and he'll go right back with a longer sentence this time.
 
At the rate it's going, when Chris gets out he's probably going to wind up in some kind of mental health program. Fifteen or so years ago, they'd regulate your internet access but I don't know if they can do that anymore. Back then, to get online, you needed a big computer or at least a laptop and you couldn't exactly be discrete about using those. Now we have smart phones and anyone who wants to go online can do so on a device that can fit into your pocket. And it's not like they're expensive, either; hell, you can even get a free phone for signing up with pre-paid, no contract cell phone companies. Not to mention, there are still public libraries out there that you can use to go online, although that will be heavily regulated. The only way they will be able to keep Chris off the internet will be if they forbid him from leaving the house and if his sentence is up, I don't know if they'll legally be able to do that.

So Chris getting onto the internet will be kinda a given but I have to imagine he'll have a case worker and tard wranglers who try to keep him away from sites he shouldn't be on. It's just a question of how much he listens to them, how much he fights them and how much he listens to the a-logs over his tard wranglers.

But that's assuming he actually gets out. I have a feeling they may let him out a month or two early, give him some restrictions he has to adhere to. He won't follow those rules and he'll go right back with a longer sentence this time.
Chris has been getting on by himself without any supervision (to his own detriment) the last few years, prior to the incest. It wasn't until Null was able to fix things for him that Chris was able to to stop e-begging and the cash came rolling in, until the incest. I agree with you that Chris needs a wrangler that will straighten him out; Chris parent's were never able to do that, now it's up to the government to do so, much to Barb's incompetence/chagrin. Chris was never able to listen to common sense and let his own ego and self destructive behavior set the course for him leading where he is now. As much as Chris is somewhat viewed as an adult, it's clear Chris can't be trusted to do anything. If Barb wasn't in the picture, and there was to mortgage on the house, how long do you think Chris can maintain 14 BLC? Chris had never been given any major responsibilities, which what high school and college was for, and Chris failed in monumental fashion. He needed someone to do stuff for him, whether it be his parents, or well meaning trolls. Chris is at the point of his life where people will have to do stuff for him, but it won't be the same hand-holding attempt like Borb. Chris has gotten used to jail life, but it will be very different for a 40 year old man with a mind of a child to take orders from someone who isn't related to him. I predict it will be an uphill battle for Chris simply because of the thresholds of his comfort zone being chipped away.

There is no feasible way Chris could ever live on his own, and it was only a matter of time until he was housed somewhere, or someone with actual adult parental experience was going to be assigned to him.
 
There is no feasible way Chris could ever live on his own, and it was only a matter of time until he was housed somewhere, or someone with actual adult parental experience was going to be assigned to him.
Agreed, but that brings up another problem: what would living with Chris be like? Will a room mate or a group home be able to tolerate him? His mom only reluctantly tolerated his dirty crapped briefs or shit encrusted sheets; how do you think the rest of the house will feel when they have to clean his crap out of the sheets when they have to do laundry? How do you think they'll tolerate his deviant sexual behavior? Chris has a bizarre habit of taking his clothes off a lot and I can't figure other people living with him will enjoy encountering that. If he has some kind of tard wrangler or staff or something, do you think they'll tolerate Chris getting an attitude and refusing to listen to them? How do you think they'll respond to his retardery? Seriously, when Chris gets out of jail, I can easily see things going worse than they would of had he just stayed behind bars.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back