- Joined
- Jul 12, 2017
This Renault protest at the racing points is going to set some major precadent. Those prescribed parts are supposed to be independently developed. I don't think we have ever had a ruling on if taking photos and working out the part from there is classed as "independently developed".
Obviously all teams get as much from their rivals as they can and set about developing in that direction but at what level does that become not independently developed?
I suppose it hinges on what level of information they have, if it is just official photos from races and testing presumably that's ok? Of they have photos that have been taken essentially spying then that's got to be pushing it and if they have physically seen the parts not attached to a car/spoke with Mercades then that's got to be crossing the line?
It's going to be drawing a line in a very grey area. If they draw it too far to one side then developing from photos/visual measurements will be stopped, then what's the development plan going forward with the wind tunnel time so restricted, no testing and budget caps. Too far to the other and they might as well allow customer cars again.
Either way if the FIA rule parts on the racing point are illegal then they are left basically without a car until they can develop all those bits "from scratch". If they do and they're very similar again is that because that is what their development says is optimal or is it because of the designer's knowledge from the last round of "development" and this illegal all over again?
This is going to open up a huge mess and I bet the FIA technical authority are really wishing racing point didn't do it or that no one brought a protest.
Obviously all teams get as much from their rivals as they can and set about developing in that direction but at what level does that become not independently developed?
I suppose it hinges on what level of information they have, if it is just official photos from races and testing presumably that's ok? Of they have photos that have been taken essentially spying then that's got to be pushing it and if they have physically seen the parts not attached to a car/spoke with Mercades then that's got to be crossing the line?
It's going to be drawing a line in a very grey area. If they draw it too far to one side then developing from photos/visual measurements will be stopped, then what's the development plan going forward with the wind tunnel time so restricted, no testing and budget caps. Too far to the other and they might as well allow customer cars again.
Either way if the FIA rule parts on the racing point are illegal then they are left basically without a car until they can develop all those bits "from scratch". If they do and they're very similar again is that because that is what their development says is optimal or is it because of the designer's knowledge from the last round of "development" and this illegal all over again?
This is going to open up a huge mess and I bet the FIA technical authority are really wishing racing point didn't do it or that no one brought a protest.