While the general impression here is that Chris sperged about hedgehogs/tardraged at the February hearing, I think what happened was more mundane.
I suspect the prosecutor was satisfied with six months time served and made an offer to release Chris at the February hearing in exchange for him agreeing to permanently stay away from 14BC and Barb. Before the February hearing, Heilberg does his job and makes certain that Chris understands the situation. He has Chris recite all the elements of the deal, emphasizes that the deal is all or nothing, and confirms that Chris knowingly agrees to everything. However, Chris is Chris. He focuses on the parts he likes, ignores the parts he doesn’t like, and lies to Heilberg about agreeing to the full deal.
On the day of the hearing, Chris unleashes his negotiation skills upon an unprepared court. “I accept the deal, but I don’t agree to mom and my home being taken away. Now set me free.” The court sends Chris off for a competency evaluation because misleading one's own lawyer is not a very competent thing to do. Chris was released relatively quickly from the hospital because their main task was to drill into Chris that he has to be completely forthcoming with his lawyer and leave the dealmaking to his counsel, and disabusing Chris of his godhood wasn't needed to achieve that.
A question for the lawyers: If the prosecutor wants an order keeping Chris away from 14BC and Barb, are there methods of doing that other than as part of a plea deal or part of sentencing after a guilty verdict? If not, I suspect Chris will reject all plea deals and force a trial. To Chris, Barb is mom and 14BC is home, and no amount of cajoling, threating, medication, or tard-wrangling will result in Chris willingly giving up either. While I think that Chris desperately wants to be freed, I also think Chris sees little purpose to freedom if it does not include the ability to return to life as he knew it for the past forty years.