As a matter of convenience, yes. If you're just some random person working a job, and your family/friends circle is average, then sure, why not.
But if I would be a streamer, and Daily Mail would be writing articles about me, and there would be a forum with 100k opinions about me - mainly negative - and if dozens, if not hundreds of other streamers and content creators would start talking about my case - AND, CRUCIALLY - if I would KNOW FOR FUCKING SURE I didn't use coke, I am not an alcoholic, I can absolutely be held accountable - yeah, I would try to prove it. I would put myself through the process, just to show people they are wrong about me.
Just so I can forever stick it in their face that I am clean, I can be absolutely dependable and reliable, and I am not above humiliating myself to the authorities, if in exchange I can prove how much I care about my kids - more than about my convenience or freedoms. I would do this for kids - to teach them something - show them that I fucked up and there is a price to pay for me. I need to get better regardless of the final sentence.
But what did Nick teach the kids - that if daddy has got big bucks he can be the exact same piece of shit forever and ever, until he fucks up so bad he has to go to prison. And even then, it's gonna be the fault of that gawd damn gubmint and that gawd damn church. It will never be Nick's fault.
I see this whole thing as another missed opportunity for Nick. Just another time where he could've taken the high road, and he decided not to.
A "missed opportunity" assumes he could meet the conditions. [X].
Personally, if I'm innocent, my freedom from invasive intervention would matter to me. It's a shit-show either way.
A clean and innocent person who was totally framed
might opt for no bond/having conditions to make a point, though even if they paid bond, they could arrange for or agree to random testing by neutral parties, if having some need to prove to "the public" that they are OK and clean.
For an addict/guilty person, there's
no benefit to agreeing to conditions (if you have a choice) other than to say, nevermind the past, for 3 months I've tested clean for drugs and have not been caught drinking. Meager. Tbf, if you can afford bond/no conditions and don't opt for it, without also going to rehab, it might suggest (in common view, not judicial or legal) that you know you can't stay straight without express requirements.
Being guilty/using and able to afford bond but choosing to go the conditional route,
plus going to rehab, acknowledges an issue but looks for leniency/ lesson learned.
On the other hand, an addict guilty of the crimes charged who can afford bond/no conditions but opts for no bond/conditions bc they think in the moment they're so scared they'll never use again is taking a big gamble.
Similarly, a guilty addict who hasn't seen fit to go straight and who thinks he can fake it or scam it for three months could try it as a show, and would likely fuck it up.
And an unrepentant guilty person and active user obviously would want to pay for no conditions, in desperation.
Tl; dr: the choice to bond out cuts multiple ways, depending on whether there is an actual dependency problem. Whether guilty or not, dependent or not, I'd rather be free from imposed requirements.
Doesn't seem to be a troll since he has years long history including replying to rekieta.
Meet Corey Leon of Leon's law based in Aliquippa Pennsylvania.
View attachment 6051272
View attachment 6051315
Link
His whole law practice seems to be composed of a one page website on GoDaddy sites which seems just to be a mildly modified template with a simple contact form.
(Couldn't pull up business records due to the Pennsylvania government website forbidding access for me)
View attachment 6051299
View attachment 6051303
View attachment 6051327
Link Archive
lol another lawyer with 3 years' experience. And a Hitler haircut. Nice.
As I understand it, Rekieta's father is that rich. Richer. His are presumably the resources Nick Rekieta and his wife will have at their disposal when legal proceedings are further underway.
Mother.
Yep. If you're not born into a small town, but move there, you're almost forever considered to be somewhat of an outsider. Even if you've lived there for 10 years, you're still considered a transplant by the local natives.
My guess is that the Spicer locals think of Nick as some kind of big city asshole rich guy. And given that Nick has little to no interest in his community and looks down on the people in his town, the locals will not be on his side.
This is especially true in MN. Now, Nick is a Minnesotan in most respects by virtue of having gone to high school, college, and law school there, but he was likely always the +1 in the community.