I'm not going to pretend there aren't people using this as a guise for pedophilia. I actually discussed at length in the
kink thread and the
kiwis against porn thread about psychological reinforcement, fetishism, paraphilia, etc. There were also a multitude of perspectives in how individuals view the same sort of content, like how you can break female porn consumers into 4 groups, with said grouping possibly applying to homosexuals too given brain-similarities but I digress.
I think the conversation is fundamentally muddied because there are people viewing the character in an abstract sense i.e. the father-daughter relationship itself and her role in it as daughter. Then the mannerisms and actions she does independent of appearance are also cute to some, annoying to others. The other half of the conversation would be those find her appearance cute in conjunction with actions/personality and those who find her cute independent of everything else. (
I personally didn't look close enough at her face to see lipstick/makeup but then again i haven't played the game)
Pedos will camouflage themselves in the discourse because they know they're universally reviled, and they have muddied the conversation further by injecting their dogwhistles and coded language into conventional discourse. When the crying emoji thing has become normalised as a means of "ragebaiting moralists" to some on the right-wing and left-wing, it's hard to differentiate between the terminally online autists and the actual pedos, which is what the pedos intend. Right now the pro-Pragmata side has people viewing this game as encouraging people to become parents, people who view it as an example that games will be successful if they cater to men (encourages fatherhood), and people who might genuinely just see it as a good game.
Fetishists regardless of paraphilia can be compared to any other fetishist group in that they will seek some form of stimulation from being open about their fetish/kink without outright stating it, because it's an escalation of fetish and acts as a way of squeezing more dopamine out of an already tapped vein (Tarantino is a notable example). Exhibitionism is sort of the next tier up from being private about it. This
can precede action in the real world, which is when it gets dangerous/disgusting—see: trannies, drag, furries, etc—and because their fetish occupies a
major part of their life, they're more loyal to
it than they are ideology, and they will side with whatever political cause they see as being the most likely to push their fetish or leave them alone.* Some people's fetish becomes so important in their life, that they will gaslight a non-perverse reason for why they have it in the first place—"It's how I deal with my trauma," etc—I wouldn't accuse people in this thread of being pedos because I'd hope a user of this website has, at bare minimum, sense enough to see this is not a pro-pedo forum. But given the site's pro-free speech, anti-censorship stances for the most part, it's not too surprising one or two end up here regardless.
I think
@Professor Donger is an
earnest fan of the game, but knows he'll be painted as a pedo by some users, so has to double down on:
1) I hate pedos
2) All the critics are drawing attention to her appearance, making them the pedos, which I hate
But in trying to defend himself, some people will see said defence as "
The lady doth protest too much" (i.e. insincere overreaction) and so label him as one regardless. I don't think he is one, I think he's just a terminally online autist, which unfortunately applies to a ton of people thus making differentiation difficult. When some autists develop a fixation on something it'll occupy a large part of their mind, and they tend to be enamoured with bright colours, fast motion, simplistic and direct modes of conveying emotion—very common in anime. I saw a lot of these types become fixated on that one horse-trainer sim (the one where the horses are just women) a while back, so I'd paint him more as an anime-fan/right-wing/quasi-normie whose defence of this game from accusations of pedophilia being more a result of doomscrolling Twitter and seeing Pragmata as being another front on the left/right culture war + defending anime as a secondary motive.
*This is why anti-censorship groups will inevitably be swarmed with porn addicts of all shades, and pro-privacy groups
will be inundated with pedos.
There are pedos using Pragmata as a means to be openly pedophilic and thus stimulate themselves, but there are those who aren't, and it's the ones who—statistically speaking—would make up the majority and would probably see the haranguing as performative. It's why any attempt to bring attention to pedos in [insert community/fandom here]-community proves ineffective because it typically ends up being applied also to the non-pedo majority who have to defend themselves
and the pedos too due to the circumstances. Recently, anti-de-banking people experienced this phenomena when Visa stopped authenticating payments for certain types of content and some of the loudest people were gooners/coomers.