Containment Random Thoughts & Questions

I don’t see her as an innocent victim.

But she is not exactly a villain either.
Just a pretty average young woman who was a bit naive and had some learning to do.

Also she had a point with the pony garbage.
Call me sexist, but I think it is an acceptable vice for people to continue an interest in childish things they liked as children.
So women who liked those pink ponies as kids, fair enough watching a new version of the cartoon as an adult just don’t expect applause for it.
Same with boys and transformers or whatever.
And sure as a parent, taking an interest in what your children like, acceptable.

However it is embarrassing when they take it too far, or when they are an childless adult taking a new interest in a toy primarily targeted at children of the opposite sex.
Megan saw that Chris was doing both of these things, so the criticism was valid.

Personally I have always felt that bronies should be rounded up and imprisoned in reeducation camps for the terminally pathetic, and never allowed near children if ever released, so perhaps I am a bit to prejudiced to be objective about this.

But hey ho!
I think it's worth mentioning this was before the new cartoon series so there's not even the excuse of it was him liking that, it was just Chris mirroring her interests and it rightly annoyed her, MLP back then was purely a nostalgia thing like saying they liked something like, I dunno, Rainbow Brite or Monster High because the were into the toys and show as a kid so I 100% agree with what you're saying.

I also think that it was just Megan being an average young awkward woman since this comes across to me as standard highschool or even college drama, at least on Megan's side of things.
 
Does anyone else sort of dislike the fact that Meagan Schroeder is seen as some innocent victim. Keep in mind, she exploited Chris for money, criticized him for liking MLP despite being a grown adult fan of MLP herself, hung around Chris despite Chris touching her, said she literally considered "dating Chris" and has had a weird fetish for Nazis.
The only bad things that happened to her were some weirdos on the internet seeing some crude inaccurate childlike drawings(supposedly of her) and becoming semi famous among internet autists.

Thats it. Her nudes didn't get leaked, her address didn't get leaked, she isn't unable to gain employment because of that situation. Not saying she deserves the things that happen to her, but we need to take a realistic look at things.
She exploited Chris in the sense that he would be a credit card with 0% interest. At the end of the day she was still paying Chris back or trading stuff with him in return for what he bought. She also set boundaries with Chris very early on but Chris ignored them and continued to happily buy her gifts in the hopes he could buy his way into her vagina. No one was forcing him to buy her gifts and if your argument is "she accepted his gifts but never let him fuck or date her" you're on the save wavelength as Chris. He only complained about being used and exploited once Megan broke contact with him for shecameforCWC, something that was entirely his fault.

As for her motivation to continue talking with him despite the unwanted touching, you could argue she had her own quirks and didn't mind being friends with him so was being patient since she knew he was autistic. You could also argue that she knew there was some benefit of a weeaboo like her being friends with a dumb manchild like Chris who had a guaranteed source of income. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle as are most adult friendships.

I think the only problem she had with Chris liking My Little Pony was that she felt he was just copying her in the hopes she would like him more. This is before the brony stuff back when My Little Pony was just a generic horse doll so from her perspective there was no catalyst for why Chris would have liked it.

The nazi stuff is weird though. I believe she makes a wehrmacht ≠ nazi argument and explains she only likes the aesthetic of the uniform. It's a popular form of cosplay in Japan where they don't really teach World War 2 properly so I can understand why people there are into it since they just see it and think it looks cool but for an American like Megan to be into it is definitely kind of odd. Regardless, a guy with an incest, elder and disabled person fetish kept trying to force himself on her so this instantly renders everything above this invalid and makes her an innocent victim of a madman who would have locked her in a basement if he could.

tldr; chris wanted to rape megan just like he raped his demented elderly mother so megan is innocent by default since there is no justification to rape someone
 
Regardless, a guy with an incest, elder and disabled person fetish kept trying to force himself on her so this instantly renders everything above this invalid and makes her an innocent victim of a madman who would have locked her in a basement if he could.
Even if we could say that Chris somehow had a fetish for elderly disabled people back in those days, Chris could barely even open a pocket knife in less than 9 seconds, and could barely lift boxes of lemonade. There's no way he'd be able to kidnap Megan, even if he had the mental capacity to. Also, Chris had said he'd do a lot of awful shit, even kill people. I don't think it'd help to look THAT deeply into him saying he'd be an "abusive maniac" beyond him just threatening her and treating her like utter garbage.
 
Last edited:
Even if we could say that Chris somehow had a fetish for elderly disabled people back in those days, Chris could barely even open a pocket knife in less than 9 seconds. There's no way he'd be able to kidnap Megan.
i worded it weirdly but i was trying to point out the contrast of comparing megans fetish to what chris ended up with. kidnapping was probably the wrong metaphor but if chris was in a situation where megan couldnt resist him he would very much force himself on her under the assumption she would eventually start to like it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ophelia
Something that I've wonder since the golden era, and haven't seen any true answer to, is why Chris sang all of his "songs" over none-karaoke versions of the original songs. Even when he had access to likely all of the songs on youtube. I always wondered if it was laziness on his part to not find the karaoke versions, or if it was part of his autism being unable to sing a song without the cues from the lyrics.
 
…is no Amber Heard.

Seriously, there are worse people out there, and not just on the internet. Everyone does things that are a little suspect or strange. Do they deserve to have their lives made a public spectacle for it?

tl;dr: What Meghan did actually is peanuts next to Chris.
Speaking of, if Chris weren't behind bars, I'm sure someone would have asked his opinion on the Heard/Depp case. Chris would go I would foresee mode in favor of Heard because "Trust Women" and I would like to see the smugness of his fat face disappear the moment the verdict was read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flavius Anthemius
Personally I have always felt that bronies should be rounded up and imprisoned in reeducation camps for the terminally pathetic

That costs money. Speaking as a taxpayer, the last thing I want is my tax dollars being wasted on bronies, one way or another.


The nazi stuff is weird though.

To be fair, the Nazis did have snappy uniforms. They were designed by Hugo Boss, after all, who, for all that he was a card carrying Nazy party member from the beginning who should have been hanged at Nuremberg, did know how to cut a suit.


Megan did try to milk an autist,

Correction: Meghan tried to milk a boy who was attracted to her. She is not the first woman to do that, nor will she be the last.


I always wondered if it was laziness on his part to not find the karaoke versions, or if it was part of his autism being unable to sing a song without the cues from the lyrics.

You're assuming Chris was even aware that karaoke versions of songs are a thing.


I would like to see the smugness of his fat face disappear the moment the verdict was read.

I could see Chris raging at the verdict, but only because other people (the usual suspects) are raging at it. I doubt he'd actually understand what he was raging about, but that's never stopped him before.
 
I appologize if this question was asked before. But you know how people like Kacey's father say that everyone remembers where they where on September 11th, 2001. This got me thinking, where were you on that fateful day where Chris' incest has been revealed to the public on July 29th 2021? Personally, I was blissfully unaware about what had happened, until the day later. I remember looking through Chris-Chan threads on the /tv/ board on 4chan, without knowing what happened, thinking it was just typical Chris-talk instead of something more, as their was no mention about what currently happened on those threads.
I saw the G5 video that day, and commented to some friends that this is the return of Classic Chris.
Found out the next day after getting a message in our gc about Chris trending, I was admittedly a bit skeptical for a moment.
 
I just found this on the Chris chan Reddit -

Screenshot 2022-06-02 at 20-05-15 r_ChrisChanSonichu - NSFW Is there any genuine medical proof...png


No way to verify it (unless someone is local) but it is interesting that Chris may have ran his mouth and confessed to everything.
 
No way to verify it (unless someone is local) but it is interesting that Chris may have ran his mouth and confessed to everything.
If that's true, then the letter where he tries to shift the blame on his mom says a lot more about his mental state than previously thought. He somehow now understands what deep shit he's in, and trying to come up with some miracle to keep it from getting worse.
 
I just found this on the Chris chan Reddit -

View attachment 3346621

No way to verify it (unless someone is local) but it is interesting that Chris may have ran his mouth and confessed to everything.
Even if it was verifiable, they need more than just the confession. I am not a lawyer myself so I don’t know the exact details they would need, but they need at least a little support for the claim outside of just words, particularly given Chris’s proclivity towards fantasy.

Chris was, we believe, deemed incompetent at some point so they also would want to cover their bases if Heilberg would try to throw out a confession on the grounds Chris could not understand his right to remain silent
 
Even if it was verifiable, they need more than just the confession. I am not a lawyer myself so I don’t know the exact details they would need, but they need at least a little support for the claim outside of just words, particularly given Chris’s proclivity towards fantasy.
I believe a positive rape kit would be enough. Even if there's no semen, they can prove intercourse from the exam itself or Barb told the police everything.
 
I just found this on the Chris chan Reddit -

No way to verify it (unless someone is local) but it is interesting that Chris may have ran his mouth and confessed to everything.
On one hand, Chris is a fucking retard and he fucking bragged about shit like this before despite being a stupid idea to do so with less important things. On the other, Chris has been trying to deflect blame on Barb for the act, so it wouldn't make much sense for him to blabber like this and fuck himself over. If it happened, it was an accident but it's not likely as he's been clearly getting desperate and even Chris is smart enough to avoid confessing like that!

It really doesn’t seem like Barb cooperated with authorities in the slightest.
She is really manipulative to the point people have no idea whether she is really suffering from Dementia or just acting up to beg for more cash. Cops are used to people lying to them, so it would be a safe bet that she either didn't cooperate out of principle or is demented enough that she isn't a reliable or even intelligible witness. Trying to make sense of what a senile person says can be a colossal pain as well, and that's when you don't need a precise retelling of the events involved!
 
It really doesn’t seem like Barb cooperated with authorities in the slightest.
If we assume Barb is senile enough that she couldn’t consent, (which I’m personally still a little doubtful of,) are there powers at the disposal of the authorities to convince her to cooperate?

As usual with my edge-case questions, I’m more generally curious about the law than speculating about Chris’s case. Say a severely handicapped person was assaulted and robbed in the street but won’t talk to the police because he thinks that the police only want to hurt people, (based on mental incompetence and not political beliefs about police.) What is in their power to try to convince him to cooperate, if anything? Is there any similar notion of victim’s incompetence like there is for the accused?
 
Back