February 5 is his next court date, but it's not entirely clear yet what the sequence of events will be.
His first appearance was that video hearing, at which there was a continuance for an arraignment.
Arraignment is often a cattle call situation, with a room full of people all being arraigned at once, some shackled and straight from jail. This may be the first time Chris meets court-appointed counsel.
An arraignment is simply the reading of charges to the defendant and represents actually formally charging him. Then the defendant enters a guilty or not guilty plea.
Other formalities may occur, such as waiving a preliminary hearing, which is basically a hearing to determine whether the DA's office has probable cause to bring charges. Since there is usually no point in bothering to have one, the vast majority of these are waived.
Then the rest of the calendar is set. In more complicated cases, this might involve conferring to agree on discovery schedules, motions in limine (arguing about what evidence is allowed), motion hearings of other kinds, etc.
In this case, it probably just goes right to trial, or to a sentencing hearing if he pleads guilty, or the defense and prosecution agree to everything, from plea to sentencing, and there is nothing more but the judge rubber stamping it.
My speculation: Chris shows up, pleads not guilty, trial date is set. We will know whether he's met his lawyer by whether he starts immediately complaining.