Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
The vaxmongers realize their previous tactics have been too highbrow:
64634.png

Joe Manchin isn't going to join Biden's song and dance (His statement).
oft.png
"Coal-addict". Bobby has funny ideas about people's motivations.

Torture? Good tactic!
Promoting the welfare of white people? Bad targets!
gfg.png
How about AOC? I bet she doesn't mind being made uncomfortable?

gfg.png

Bobby on auto mode:
auto.png

Lass Library is from New Mexico:
Veee.png

9.png

Not only would Hillary Rodham brought us Moon Base and jetpacks; she would have "blown" White Christian Patriarchy off the board of history, "in a non-'messy' fashion".
Biden.png

Luke's been on a tirade about the demerits of anarchism. This bit caught Bobby's eyes:
te4t.png
(More)


Bobby clarifies he doesn't hate Villeneuve. It is incredibly easy to earn Bobby's hate but Bobby doesn't hate Villeneuve.
Veee.png

If Bobby has liked James Cameron, he is not any more (Variety article and video)
gfg.png
The comments are full of "Cameron doesn't have to be such a jerk!"

People take umbrage at Bobby's swipe at "filmbros". Bobby can maintain his smug for a while...
1.png

...but when MCU is mentioned, all masks are off!
1.png
Again, Bobby pretends that people hate him because he so happens to review a lot of MCU -- not because of his clannish fanboyism, his hyperboles at MCU's cultural import, and his ridiculous attempts to find depth at the bottom of a popcorn bag.

That Spiderman is more popular than The Eternals turns out to be a deep racial problem:
43443634.png

Angel continues with race-wanking:
43443634.png

43443634.png

te4t.png

Veee.png
 
Yep. I thought it was so stupid when he admitted that in his headcanon the real title of Super Mario World was Super Mario Bros. 4: Super Mario World, and he got really pissy with Mario World 2 before it even came out for destroying his hopes to one day see Mario Bros reach double digits. Even before the ending that contradicted the American canon, that game was attacking his world view.
Bob has been crying even more loudly and obnoxiously as Baby Mario in that game ever since.
 
Robert is such a pussy. At least once a week he endorses eugenics. Sure, he's only got a handful of tweets where he outright says this, but he has thousands of tweets where he supports the concept. And his grasp of "eugenics" is much like his grasp of everything else, not great, because he often seems to think that Republicans/Trump supporters are genetically predisposed to such political views.

His only honest tweet on the subject is the one about the Nazis giving it a bad name. It was an incredibly popular idea among the previous turn of the century Progressives. The Supreme Court of the era endorsed it because "three generations of imbeciles is enough" which could be a Robert tweet if it was written more poorly. He should just proclaim himself a bold THINKER and defend his ideas.
I mean, eugenics is pretty based but if you care about shit like "ableism" and don't believe in IQ and think eugenics should be based on people's "moral character" then you're literally just a Hitlerite because that's the exact kind of eugenics Hitler wanted. Bobby Boy is right that the Nazi's made eugenics into a dirty word and a seemingly evil concept but they did this through connecting it to genocide so thoroughly and pushing the idea that the undesirables should be enslaved and worked to death instead of just being strongly advised not to breed or the government putting standards in place for breeding eligibility, which of these things do you think Bob would want if he could have is way, hm? I would not say he'd pass up the ability to put people who disagree with him politically into camps so I'm actually not quite sure what kind of like problems he has with Nazism or Fascism in general.

I don't think he actually wants to make society better, I think he wants revenge against society for not valuing him and all of the lefty shit is a complete larp. I don't want people to be born who will have a hard and painful life, Bob just kind of wants to kill everyone who doesn't agree with him. Bob is like the worst possible person to be pro-eugenics though because could you actually imagine a society fully of Moviebobs thriving and not self-destructing within a few months? A Moviebob Society would make CHAZ look like a fucking paradise.
 
Yep. I thought it was so stupid when he admitted that in his headcanon the real title of Super Mario World was Super Mario Bros. 4: Super Mario World, and he got really pissy with Mario World 2 before it even came out for destroying his hopes to one day see Mario Bros reach double digits. Even before the ending that contradicted the American canon, that game was attacking his world view.
Don't forget that Bob also has stated that to him being a fan is purely time investment. He literally sees enjoying a series and consooming product as a job. It isn't passion for him, not even Mario in some respects.

There's no wonder Bob relies on his infantile rage and delusions to not just fucking kill himself. Because he doesn't even really consoom product because he likes it on some level; it's just because he wants the social standing.

Because one time at the age of nine he could pretend he actually had friends when people came over to play SMB3.
 
Last edited:
I don't think he actually wants to make society better, I think he wants revenge against society for not valuing him and all of the lefty shit is a complete larp.
Bob's rhetoric sounds incredibly close to Ayn Rand's, especially his utterly asinine "Thinkers vs. Believers" bromides. I was watching NerdSync's video on Steve Ditko's run on Spider-Man and how how terrible it was because of how Ditko used it as platform to extoll his objectivist beliefs, which made me wonder how similar Bob is to Steve in personality. Yes, Ditko was one of the most influential artists in the entire medium, but he was also an embittered and misanthropic crank who loathed the fans. The man even posthumously published a collection of essays ranting about how much he hated them, much is not too dissimilar to how Bob published a collection of his old blog posts. I imagine Bob will meet a similar end, dying alone in his basement hovel with the corpse discovered days after the fact because he had no close relatives or friends to check on him.
 
Bob's rhetoric sounds incredibly close to Ayn Rand's, especially his utterly asinine "Thinkers vs. Believers" bromides. I was watching NerdSync's video on Steve Ditko's run on Spider-Man and how how terrible it was because of how Ditko used it as platform to extoll his objectivist beliefs, which made me wonder how similar Bob is to Steve in personality. Yes, Ditko was one of the most influential artists in the entire medium, but he was also an embittered and misanthropic crank who loathed the fans. The man even posthumously published a collection of essays ranting about how much he hated them, much is not too dissimilar to how Bob published a collection of his old blog posts. I imagine Bob will meet a similar end, dying alone in his basement hovel with the corpse discovered days after the fact because he had no close relatives or friends to check on him.
Why tf don't people like Bob and Quinton realize that if their ideals and worldview are solely responsible for them living miserable lives then they have the wrong ideals and worldview?
 
Bob's rhetoric sounds incredibly close to Ayn Rand's, especially his utterly asinine "Thinkers vs. Believers" bromides. I was watching NerdSync's video on Steve Ditko's run on Spider-Man and how how terrible it was because of how Ditko used it as platform to extoll his objectivist beliefs, which made me wonder how similar Bob is to Steve in personality. Yes, Ditko was one of the most influential artists in the entire medium, but he was also an embittered and misanthropic crank who loathed the fans. The man even posthumously published a collection of essays ranting about how much he hated them, much is not too dissimilar to how Bob published a collection of his old blog posts. I imagine Bob will meet a similar end, dying alone in his basement hovel with the corpse discovered days after the fact because he had no close relatives or friends to check on him.
A hallmark of a lot of Rand's work is that there is someone who is exceptional (not in the Kiwifarm's euphemism kind of way) and they separate themselves from society and build something greater. Ditko, for all his failings was a demonstrably important figure to the early days of comics, while hardly perfect, you can at least see how the man could get an ego.

Bob's ego outstrips pretty much anyone I've seen, especially when contrasted with his meager accomplishments.
 
The vaxmongers realize their previous tactics have been too highbrow:
View attachment 2814590
There's a really strangely high number of "pro-science" people who don't know what ivermectin is or its side-uses. It's like seeing a bowl only used for soup, and freaking out when you see that not only can it be used for cereal but you can crack your eggs in it and mix them up. Things have multiple uses. Drugs especially have multiple uses. You are not pro-science if you close your mind to helpful side effects of a drug because someone told you it was for something else first. Pretty much every covid treatment before the vaccine got demonized the same way despite there being tests.

The only difference is that there was no big company profiting off the use of these other drugs. Now anti-malaria treatments are actually extremely deadly danger drugs nobody has ever used before and would kill you if you tried, and ivermectin is horse dewormer despite the fact it exists in a human form you can get at a pharmacy and the anti-parasitic effect isn't the only thing it can do.
 
Bob's rhetoric sounds incredibly close to Ayn Rand's, especially his utterly asinine "Thinkers vs. Believers" bromides. I was watching NerdSync's video on Steve Ditko's run on Spider-Man and how how terrible it was because of how Ditko used it as platform to extoll his objectivist beliefs, which made me wonder how similar Bob is to Steve in personality. Yes, Ditko was one of the most influential artists in the entire medium, but he was also an embittered and misanthropic crank who loathed the fans. The man even posthumously published a collection of essays ranting about how much he hated them, much is not too dissimilar to how Bob published a collection of his old blog posts. I imagine Bob will meet a similar end, dying alone in his basement hovel with the corpse discovered days after the fact because he had no close relatives or friends to check on him.
When I was an edgy lolbert teenager, I read Atlas Shrugged and I can confirm that Bob's views on life are pretty similar to Rand's. Both are euphoric atheists, both insist that FACTS and LOGIC are on their side, both believe in a Whig history-style view of life where some vague concept of "societal progress" will always triumph, both dehumanise their enemies as worthless "looters" or "obsoletes", both worship technology and are convinced that all society's problems could be solved with it, and both have no morality beyond "the end justifies the means".

And like Rand, who died on benefits, Bob will also manage to die hypocritically; he'll die in a care home next to a Trump-voting "GQP Qaren" while an underpaid Filipina nurse with a rosary around her neck tries to revive him after his fifth heart attack in a week.
 
Why tf don't people like Bob and Quinton realize that if their ideals and worldview are solely responsible for them living miserable lives then they have the wrong ideals and worldview?
because they are hypocrites. Instead of realizing their own worldview is fucked, they blame outside sources for whatever goes wrong, because HOW DARE the plebs accuse the Holy Path to the Soopeeryah Fyootchah of being imperfect? You know, like a typical Saturday Morning Cartoon Villain/Narcissist/Karen.
 
because they are hypocrites. Instead of realizing their own worldview is fucked, they blame outside sources for whatever goes wrong, because HOW DARE the plebs accuse the Holy Path to the Soopeeryah Fyootchah of being imperfect? You know, like a typical Saturday Morning Cartoon Villain/Narcissist/Karen.
I think it also has to do with their own ego. They think they are holding some sort of super intelligent outlook and say “WELL THIS IS THE COST OF BEING SUCH AN INTELLECTUAL, IGNORANCE TRULY IS BLISS!” Bob is only truly happy when he has a mahvel pictcha to distract him from his own shitty ethical code he holds everyone else beside himself to.
 
Ditko, for all his failings was a demonstrably important figure to the early days of comics, while hardly perfect, you can at least see how the man could get an ego.
Oh, there's no doubt Ditko was one of the most influential figures in medium. His personality... problems stem from the fact that we was a loner who was hyper-focused on his art. He did much of his early work with Charlton with no editorial oversight and only moved to Atlas/Marvel because the pay was better. It worked out well because his unique style was suited to the monster/horror comics of the pre-Marvel era, but less so for superheroes. Jack Kirby knew how to make people look attractive, but Ditko's figures had a more grotesque quality to them that probably unnerved some fans. Compare his Betty Bryant and Liz Allan to John Romita Sr.'s Gwen Stacy and Mary-Jane Watson. It drew both praise and criticism, but Steve was singularly focused on the criticism. It didn't help that Martin Goodman made promises about sharing in the Spider-Man profits that he never delivered on and Steve believed that Stan Lee took too much of the credit. It wouldn't surprise me in the least that he say Goodman and Lee as looters who were profiting off his talent. As such, he turned Amazing Spider-Man into an author tract for his objectivist beliefs before he abruptly left.

Steve did return to Charlton to revamp Blue Beetle and create the Question while he also worked on Creeper and Hawk & Dove at DC, but it was pretty much downhill from there. He received fewer assignments throughout the 70s and 80s until he virtually disappeared to work on Mr. A.

If I had to draw any parallels between Steve Ditko and Bob Chipman, it would be that Bob is laser-focused on Space Age futurism and tied it to his political beliefs. The fat bastard deluded himself into believing that the Democratic establishment wants the same things he wants and that it's the "GQP" and the Mayo Ghouls of the Rust Belt are blocking that road to the glorious future that exists only in his fevered imagination. Note how hostile and obsessive he becomes when leftists like Peter Coffin and Glen Greenwald dare criticize the establishment, or when people dare criticize him. While Steve Ditko has many accomplishments to his name, all Bob as when it comes to legacy is his Pixels review and the Consoomer meme.
 
Why tf don't people like Bob and Quinton realize that if their ideals and worldview are solely responsible for them living miserable lives then they have the wrong ideals and worldview?
because they are hypocrites. Instead of realizing their own worldview is fucked, they blame outside sources for whatever goes wrong, because HOW DARE the plebs accuse the Holy Path to the Soopeeryah Fyootchah of being imperfect? You know, like a typical Saturday Morning Cartoon Villain/Narcissist/Karen.

To add more to this. There have been cases where he has shown to be fully aware of the state he is in. And even doubted himself. However, his inability to let go of the past, look past beyond revenge and a constant obsession to satisfy his lust for pain have pushed him back to the same corner. He knows WHY he is angry all the time, but he is too stubborn and too emotionally immature to act on it. And even if he did, it is too late to change anything currently.

He is doomed to live in misery, and he knows it. Instead of trying to leave a good impression so others don't remember him as the angry, bitter fatty that he is. He acts on the role as best as possible because he rather die than admit defeat, and let 'those chuds' win in the end.

How sad that Bob doesn't realize there's grace even in defeat.
 
"I have to see this now because everyone else is"

Top-tier Thinker logic right there!
Personally I like the bit about how movies making lots of money makes him happy. He hasn’t even seen this movie yet, but that doesn’t matter, he’s just clapping at the big numbers. @Adamska posted about exactly this on the previous page.
 
I think it also has to do with their own ego. They think they are holding some sort of super intelligent outlook and say “WELL THIS IS THE COST OF BEING SUCH AN INTELLECTUAL, IGNORANCE TRULY IS BLISS!” Bob is only truly happy when he has a mahvel pictcha to distract him from his own shitty ethical code he holds everyone else beside himself to.
well to be fair, narcissism and a huge fat ego go hand in hand 99.9% of the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back